Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico

IF 1.6 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ethnobiology and Conservation Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.15451/ec2023-03-12.08-1-18
Mónica Bello Román, A. García Flores, J. P. Pino Moreno
{"title":"Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico","authors":"Mónica Bello Román, A. García Flores, J. P. Pino Moreno","doi":"10.15451/ec2023-03-12.08-1-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this research was to analyze the knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in a rural community in the southwestern part of the state of Morelos, Mexico. The methodology included participant observation, semistructured interviews and guided tours and methods for obtaining and analyzing quantitative data “such as analysis of variance, a Mann–Whitney U test and X 2 test”. The interviewees recognized a total of 57 species of wildlife, of which 22 are used as food, medicine, ornament, amulets, furs and agricultural tools in four traditional production units. In addition, eight species were reported in the oral tradition. Four hunting techniques and five weapons were documented, with the shotgun being the most commonly used. Two factors regulate hunting in the community: the closed season and religion. A total of 62,454 kg of useful biomass was recorded, with mammals being the group that contributed the most kilograms, followed by reptiles and birds. There were no significant differences in species consumption, across months or rainy and dry seasons due to factors regulating hunting. Based on the total value index of the species, Odocoileus virginianus was the most important for the inhabitants of the community.","PeriodicalId":44826,"journal":{"name":"Ethnobiology and Conservation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnobiology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2023-03-12.08-1-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this research was to analyze the knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in a rural community in the southwestern part of the state of Morelos, Mexico. The methodology included participant observation, semistructured interviews and guided tours and methods for obtaining and analyzing quantitative data “such as analysis of variance, a Mann–Whitney U test and X 2 test”. The interviewees recognized a total of 57 species of wildlife, of which 22 are used as food, medicine, ornament, amulets, furs and agricultural tools in four traditional production units. In addition, eight species were reported in the oral tradition. Four hunting techniques and five weapons were documented, with the shotgun being the most commonly used. Two factors regulate hunting in the community: the closed season and religion. A total of 62,454 kg of useful biomass was recorded, with mammals being the group that contributed the most kilograms, followed by reptiles and birds. There were no significant differences in species consumption, across months or rainy and dry seasons due to factors regulating hunting. Based on the total value index of the species, Odocoileus virginianus was the most important for the inhabitants of the community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥莫雷洛斯Zoquital社区野生动物的知识、使用和传统管理
农民和土著社区通过其传统生产活动,积累了有关野生动物使用和管理的知识,以满足他们对食物、药品的需求,甚至通过物种营销来补充他们的基本食物篮。本研究的目的是分析墨西哥莫雷洛斯州西南部农村社区野生动物的知识、使用和传统管理。该方法包括参与者观察、半结构化访谈和导游,以及获取和分析定量数据的方法,“如方差分析、Mann-Whitney U检验和X2检验”。受访者共识别了57种野生动物,其中22种在四个传统生产单位用作食品、药品、装饰品、护身符、毛皮和农具。此外,据报道,有8个物种属于口头传统。记录了四种狩猎技术和五种武器,其中最常用的是猎枪。社区狩猎有两个因素:禁猎季节和宗教。共记录了62454公斤的有用生物量,哺乳动物是贡献最多公斤的群体,其次是爬行动物和鸟类。由于调节狩猎的因素,不同月份或雨季和旱季的物种消耗量没有显著差异。根据该物种的总价值指数,弗吉尼亚刺蛾对该群落的居民来说是最重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnobiology and Conservation
Ethnobiology and Conservation BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Ethnobiology and Conservation (EC) is an open access and peer-reviewed online journal that publishes original contributions in all fields of ethnobiology and conservation of nature. The scope of EC includes traditional ecological knowledge, human ecology, ethnoecology, ethnopharmacology, ecological anthropology, and history and philosophy of science. Contributions in the area of conservation of nature can involve studies that are normally in the field of traditional ecological studies, as well as in animal and plant biology, ethology, biogeography, management of fauna and flora, and ethical and legal aspects about the conservation of biodiversity. However, all papers should focus explicitly on their contribution to the conservation of nature. Merely descriptive papers without a theoretical discussion contextualized from the findings, although possibly being accepted, will not be given priority for publication.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the drivers of the live bird trade in Brazil Traditional ecological knowledge of mangrove wood use on the Brazilian Amazon coast Politics of Knowledge in Conservation: (De)valued Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Bote in Chitwan National Park, Nepal A Bibliometric Analysis Concerning Local Ecological Knowledge on Elasmobranchs and Chimaeras Comparison of local ecological knowledge versus camera trapping to establish terrestrial wildlife baselines in community hunting territories within the Yangambi landscape in the Democratic Republic of Congo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1