Patients’ preference for general or regional anaesthesia for caesarean deliveries at a district hospital, Free State, South Africa

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2019-11-06 DOI:10.7196/SAJOG.1444
J. Hanekom, R. Hattingh, W. Nel, K. Thirion, C. Willemse, G. Joubert, C. Boltman, J. Botes
{"title":"Patients’ preference for general or regional anaesthesia for caesarean deliveries at a district hospital, Free State, South Africa","authors":"J. Hanekom, R. Hattingh, W. Nel, K. Thirion, C. Willemse, G. Joubert, C. Boltman, J. Botes","doi":"10.7196/SAJOG.1444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Informing patients about available anaesthesia options allows patients to share in decision-making.  Objectives. To determine the preference for general or regional anaesthesia among patients admitted for elective caesarean delivery at a district hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa, and whether the patients were informed about their anaesthesia options by their doctor.  Methods. Consecutive sampling was used. Patients ≥18 years old and who had had a caesarean delivery under general or regional anaesthesia participated in the study. Data were collected using a questionnaire, which was completed during formal interviews with patients.  Results. Of the 50 patients interviewed, 30 (60.0%) preferred regional anaesthesia. With regard to the current surgery, 58.0% stated that they were informed of the available anaesthesia options.  Conclusion. The majority of the patients in our study preferred regional anaesthesia. Although only 58.0% reported that they received information, many of those valued the doctor’s opinion in their choice of anaesthesia.","PeriodicalId":49579,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7196/SAJOG.1444","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJOG.1444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Informing patients about available anaesthesia options allows patients to share in decision-making.  Objectives. To determine the preference for general or regional anaesthesia among patients admitted for elective caesarean delivery at a district hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa, and whether the patients were informed about their anaesthesia options by their doctor.  Methods. Consecutive sampling was used. Patients ≥18 years old and who had had a caesarean delivery under general or regional anaesthesia participated in the study. Data were collected using a questionnaire, which was completed during formal interviews with patients.  Results. Of the 50 patients interviewed, 30 (60.0%) preferred regional anaesthesia. With regard to the current surgery, 58.0% stated that they were informed of the available anaesthesia options.  Conclusion. The majority of the patients in our study preferred regional anaesthesia. Although only 58.0% reported that they received information, many of those valued the doctor’s opinion in their choice of anaesthesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在南非自由邦的一家地区医院,患者对剖腹产全身或区域麻醉的偏好
背景。告知患者可用的麻醉选择可以让患者参与决策。目标。在南非布隆方丹的一家地区医院接受选择性剖宫产的患者中,确定他们对全身麻醉还是局部麻醉的偏好,以及患者是否被医生告知他们的麻醉选择。方法。采用连续抽样。年龄≥18岁且在全身或局部麻醉下剖腹产的患者参加了研究。数据收集使用问卷调查,并在与患者的正式访谈中完成。结果。在受访的50例患者中,30例(60.0%)首选区域麻醉。对于目前的手术,58.0%的人表示他们被告知可用的麻醉选择。结论。在我们的研究中,大多数患者倾向于局部麻醉。虽然只有58.0%的人报告说他们收到了信息,但其中许多人在选择麻醉时重视医生的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The SAJOG is a tri-annual, general specialist obstetrics and gynaecology journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. The journal carries original research articles, editorials, clinical practice, personal opinion, South Africa health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Does adding coenzyme Q10 to dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate positively impact fertility outcomes in young, poor responder infertile women undergoing antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI cycles? Prevalence and severity of depression and anxiety in infertile female patients attending an academic hospital in central South Africa Is medicine a process of scientific rigour? How to care for fetuses with prenatally diagnosed severe abnormalities Prevalence of and sociodemographic factors associated with antenatal depression among women in Limpopo Province, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1