Combinación de antidepresivos vs. aumentación con antipsicóticos atípicos tras no lograr la remisión en la depresión unipolar

R. Philippi, R. Correa
{"title":"Combinación de antidepresivos vs. aumentación con antipsicóticos atípicos tras no lograr la remisión en la depresión unipolar","authors":"R. Philippi, R. Correa","doi":"10.4067/s0717-92272022000300337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: achieving functional recovery as quickly as possible in the treatment of unipolar depression is a challenge that clinical practice must try to meet nowadays, since any delay in accomplishing remission of the symptoms is predictive of a larger number of recurrences and higher morbidity and mortality rates. In this topical review we aim to guide clinicians in their choice to augment with atypical antipsychotics or to combine the baseline drug with a second antidepressant, after the dose of the antidepressant initially selected has been optimized and/or the antidepressant has been changed, not achieving remission, or resulting only in a partial response after sufficient time at an appropriate dose. These decisions arise frequently in everyday clinical practice. Methodology: a systematic search in PubMed was performed under several key combinations of words, resulting in 230 reports. After applying inclusion criteria and based in title and abstract, the final number of reports selected for full revision were 113. Two main questions were answered based on these studies: 1) Is there evidence to clearly recommend combination of antidepressants vs. augmentation with antipsychotics (and the correct moment to do it) in non-responsive unipolar depression, once optimization or switching strategies have failed to obtain remission? and 2) Is it possible to identify some clinical features to guide the decision of combination of antidepressants vs. augmentation with antipsychotic agents? Results: According to our analysis, there is no data available to select one strategy from another in a clear-cut manner. Nevertheless, we suggest favoring a combination or augmentation strategy, based in a “treating to target” approach to profile the patient, considering one or two predominant clinical features that remain active as part of a major depression with partial response. Proper analysis of the symptomatic domains present, a critical view of current clinical guidelines and preferred options, considering hidden bipolarity as one of the main differential diagnoses and adopting an energetic but lucid attitude at this stage of treatment are, in our view, fundamental for achieving ad integrum patient recovery.","PeriodicalId":39300,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Neuro-Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-92272022000300337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: achieving functional recovery as quickly as possible in the treatment of unipolar depression is a challenge that clinical practice must try to meet nowadays, since any delay in accomplishing remission of the symptoms is predictive of a larger number of recurrences and higher morbidity and mortality rates. In this topical review we aim to guide clinicians in their choice to augment with atypical antipsychotics or to combine the baseline drug with a second antidepressant, after the dose of the antidepressant initially selected has been optimized and/or the antidepressant has been changed, not achieving remission, or resulting only in a partial response after sufficient time at an appropriate dose. These decisions arise frequently in everyday clinical practice. Methodology: a systematic search in PubMed was performed under several key combinations of words, resulting in 230 reports. After applying inclusion criteria and based in title and abstract, the final number of reports selected for full revision were 113. Two main questions were answered based on these studies: 1) Is there evidence to clearly recommend combination of antidepressants vs. augmentation with antipsychotics (and the correct moment to do it) in non-responsive unipolar depression, once optimization or switching strategies have failed to obtain remission? and 2) Is it possible to identify some clinical features to guide the decision of combination of antidepressants vs. augmentation with antipsychotic agents? Results: According to our analysis, there is no data available to select one strategy from another in a clear-cut manner. Nevertheless, we suggest favoring a combination or augmentation strategy, based in a “treating to target” approach to profile the patient, considering one or two predominant clinical features that remain active as part of a major depression with partial response. Proper analysis of the symptomatic domains present, a critical view of current clinical guidelines and preferred options, considering hidden bipolarity as one of the main differential diagnoses and adopting an energetic but lucid attitude at this stage of treatment are, in our view, fundamental for achieving ad integrum patient recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗抑郁药与非典型抗精神病药物联合使用在单极抑郁症无法缓解后的增加
引言:在单极性抑郁症的治疗中,尽快实现功能恢复是当今临床实践必须努力应对的挑战,因为症状缓解的任何延迟都预示着大量复发和更高的发病率和死亡率。在这篇专题综述中,我们的目的是指导临床医生在最初选择的抗抑郁药的剂量被优化和/或抗抑郁药被改变后,选择使用非典型抗精神病药物或将基线药物与第二种抗抑郁药联合使用,但未达到缓解,或在适当剂量下足够时间后仅产生部分反应。这些决定在日常临床实践中经常出现。方法:在PubMed中对几个关键词组合进行系统搜索,得到230份报告。在采用纳入标准并以标题和摘要为基础后,最终选择进行全面修订的报告数量为113份。基于这些研究,我们回答了两个主要问题:1)一旦优化或切换策略未能获得缓解,是否有证据明确建议在无反应的单极性抑郁症中联合使用抗抑郁药与增强抗精神病药物(以及正确的时机)?以及2)是否有可能确定一些临床特征来指导抗抑郁药与抗精神病药物联合用药的决策?结果:根据我们的分析,没有数据可以明确地从另一种策略中选择一种。尽管如此,考虑到作为部分反应的严重抑郁症的一部分仍然活跃的一个或两个主要临床特征,我们建议基于“靶向治疗”的方法,采用组合或增强策略来描述患者。在我们看来,对现有症状领域的适当分析、对当前临床指南和首选方案的批判性看法、将隐性双极性视为主要鉴别诊断之一以及在治疗的这一阶段采取积极但清醒的态度,是实现ad integrum患者康复的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: La Revista Chilena de Neuro-psychiatry was established in 1947 and belongs to the Society of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, Chile (SONEPSYN), of which his body of scientific expression. The financial management of the magazine conducted the directory SONEPSYN. The editorial management is delegated to an editor and editorial committee, who have full freedom and independence in this area. Is a quarterly publication. The journal publishes original articles and unpublished covering basic and clinical aspects of the three specialties with ethics, medical education, physician-patient relationship, care management, public health, epidemiology, sociology and medical profession.
期刊最新文献
Femicidio Madurez neuropsicológica en niños bilingües y monolingües de zonas urbanas y rurales de la región Arequipa Intervención ambulatoria basada en categorización por complejidad en neurorehabilitación Caracterización clínica y sociodemográfica del intento suicida en la Región de Los Ríos, Chile Funciones ejecutivas de niños con trastorno por déficit de atención e hiperactividad con o sin epilepsia rolándica benigna
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1