Criminal Sanctions for Unauthorized Transportation of Protected Animals: Perspective of the Purpose of Punishment

Achmad Nazir Thaharah
{"title":"Criminal Sanctions for Unauthorized Transportation of Protected Animals: Perspective of the Purpose of Punishment","authors":"Achmad Nazir Thaharah","doi":"10.25041/aelr.v4i2.2980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The trade of protected wildlife has a detrimental impact on the sustainability of endangered wildlife populations in Indonesia. Criminal punishment against the perpetrators of the crime of transportation of animals for the purpose of trade must be able to provide a deterrent effect and benefits for the protection of animals. The imposition of punishment in the criminal act of transportation of protected wildlife needs to be examined further from the aspect of the purpose of punishment, which is to prevent criminal acts by enforcing legal norms for the protection of society. This article will discuss the basic considerations of judges in punishing perpetrators of criminal acts without the right to transport protected animals alive. And the imposition of punishment by the judge against the perpetrator of the crime is in accordance with the purpose of punishment or not. The research method uses normative research methods, with literature studies in the form of laws and regulations related to the issues discussed. Based on the results of the research, as in Decision Number: 77/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Tjk, the punishment of the perpetrators of the criminal act of transporting protected wildlife in a live state is based on juridical, sociological, and philosophical considerations. The author recommends that perpetrators of protected wildlife trade be sentenced to heavy fines because their actions are economically motivated. In addition, it is necessary to regulate social work sanctions for convicted poachers and protected wildlife traffickers to restore the consequences of the criminal acts that have been committed.","PeriodicalId":52589,"journal":{"name":"Administrative and Environmental Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative and Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/aelr.v4i2.2980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The trade of protected wildlife has a detrimental impact on the sustainability of endangered wildlife populations in Indonesia. Criminal punishment against the perpetrators of the crime of transportation of animals for the purpose of trade must be able to provide a deterrent effect and benefits for the protection of animals. The imposition of punishment in the criminal act of transportation of protected wildlife needs to be examined further from the aspect of the purpose of punishment, which is to prevent criminal acts by enforcing legal norms for the protection of society. This article will discuss the basic considerations of judges in punishing perpetrators of criminal acts without the right to transport protected animals alive. And the imposition of punishment by the judge against the perpetrator of the crime is in accordance with the purpose of punishment or not. The research method uses normative research methods, with literature studies in the form of laws and regulations related to the issues discussed. Based on the results of the research, as in Decision Number: 77/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN.Tjk, the punishment of the perpetrators of the criminal act of transporting protected wildlife in a live state is based on juridical, sociological, and philosophical considerations. The author recommends that perpetrators of protected wildlife trade be sentenced to heavy fines because their actions are economically motivated. In addition, it is necessary to regulate social work sanctions for convicted poachers and protected wildlife traffickers to restore the consequences of the criminal acts that have been committed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非法运输保护动物的刑事处罚:处罚目的的视角
受保护野生动物的贸易对印度尼西亚濒危野生动物种群的可持续性产生了不利影响。对以贸易为目的运输动物犯罪行为人的刑事处罚,必须能够起到威慑作用,有利于保护动物。运输保护野生动物犯罪行为的刑罚实施需要从刑罚的目的来进一步考察,刑罚的目的是通过执行法律规范来防止犯罪行为,保护社会。本文将探讨法官在惩罚无保护动物活运权犯罪行为人时的基本考虑。法官对行为人的刑罚是否符合刑罚的目的。研究方法采用规范性研究方法,以文献研究的形式对相关法律法规问题进行探讨。根据研究结果,如第77/Pid.B/LH/2020/PN号决议。Tjk,对在活着的状态下运输受保护野生动物的犯罪行为的肇事者的惩罚是基于法律、社会学和哲学的考虑。作者建议对保护野生动物贸易的肇事者处以高额罚款,因为他们的行为是出于经济动机。此外,有必要规范对被定罪的偷猎者和受保护野生动物贩运者的社会工作制裁,以恢复所犯犯罪行为的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Agricultural Land Pawning as a Social Institution in Wono Agung Village Tulang Bawang District Legal Risks in Future Housing Purchase and Sale Contracts: A Case Research in Vietnam Legal Certainty of the Right to Severance Pay for Workers Who Retire in Companies That Undergo Acquisitions The Authority of Lampung Provincial Government in Managing Fisheries Resources in Era of Regional Autonomy The Role of Environmental Legal Instruments and Government Policies in Realizing Sustainable Development in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1