London Fire Brigade's screen and treat approach to the Grenfell Tower incident

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Emergency Services Pub Date : 2021-08-03 DOI:10.1108/ijes-07-2020-0036
C. Steel, Zoe Travers, L. Meredith, Deborah Lee, Michael E Conti, A. Scoging
{"title":"London Fire Brigade's screen and treat approach to the Grenfell Tower incident","authors":"C. Steel, Zoe Travers, L. Meredith, Deborah Lee, Michael E Conti, A. Scoging","doi":"10.1108/ijes-07-2020-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose is to report on the mental health response to the Grenfell incident within the London Fire Brigade (LFB).Design/methodology/approachThe LFB implemented screening for the symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at 28 days, 3 months and 6 months for all personnel directly involved in the incident.FindingsThe prevalence of PTSD within frontline personnel was 13.4% at 28 days, falling to 7.6% at 6 months. The LFB's internal Counselling and Wellbeing Service offered treatment to those scoring above the cut-off for PTSD along with accepting self-referral and referrals from line managers and occupational health. There were 139 referrals within the 12-month period following the incident.Research limitations/implicationsThe outcomes for those who engaged in treatment are broadly in line with other studies evaluating post-disaster interventions. Issues for consideration within national guidelines are discussed.Practical implicationsThe screen and treat approach adopted by LFB was shown to be a feasible approach to use within such a scenario.Originality/valueThe current study reports on a screen and treat approach to one of the largest single incidents in the UK in recent years.","PeriodicalId":44087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijes-07-2020-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose is to report on the mental health response to the Grenfell incident within the London Fire Brigade (LFB).Design/methodology/approachThe LFB implemented screening for the symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at 28 days, 3 months and 6 months for all personnel directly involved in the incident.FindingsThe prevalence of PTSD within frontline personnel was 13.4% at 28 days, falling to 7.6% at 6 months. The LFB's internal Counselling and Wellbeing Service offered treatment to those scoring above the cut-off for PTSD along with accepting self-referral and referrals from line managers and occupational health. There were 139 referrals within the 12-month period following the incident.Research limitations/implicationsThe outcomes for those who engaged in treatment are broadly in line with other studies evaluating post-disaster interventions. Issues for consideration within national guidelines are discussed.Practical implicationsThe screen and treat approach adopted by LFB was shown to be a feasible approach to use within such a scenario.Originality/valueThe current study reports on a screen and treat approach to one of the largest single incidents in the UK in recent years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伦敦消防队对格伦费尔大厦事件的筛查和处理方法
目的报告伦敦消防队(LFB)对格伦费尔事件的心理健康反应。设计/方法/方法LFB对所有直接参与事件的人员在28天、3个月和6个月时进行创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状筛查。研究发现,一线人员PTSD患病率在28天时为13.4%,在6个月时降至7.6%。LFB的内部咨询和福利服务为那些得分高于PTSD分界点的人提供治疗,同时接受自我推荐、直线经理和职业健康部门的推荐。事件发生后的12个月内,共有139宗转介个案。研究局限性/意义参与治疗的患者的结果与评估灾后干预措施的其他研究大体一致。讨论了在国家准则范围内需要考虑的问题。实际意义LFB采用的筛选和治疗方法被证明是在这种情况下使用的可行方法。原创性/价值当前的研究报告了近年来英国最大的单一事件之一的屏幕和治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Emergency Services
International Journal of Emergency Services SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Australian paramedics following the introduction of professional regulation: a qualitative exploration Optimization of new fire department location using an improved GIS algorithm for firefighters travel time estimation The adoption of evidence-based policing: the pivotal role of first-line police leaders across England and Wales The impacts of leadership behaviours on the mental well-being of public safety communicators Towards disaster prevention in community centers: development of a code-based fire risk assessment tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1