Parent involvement in education? A Foucauldian discourse analysis of school newsletters

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Power and Education Pub Date : 2021-04-26 DOI:10.1177/17577438211011623
Shauna Kingston
{"title":"Parent involvement in education? A Foucauldian discourse analysis of school newsletters","authors":"Shauna Kingston","doi":"10.1177/17577438211011623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ontario Ministry of Education (2010) puts forth parent involvement as a solution for underachievement and as a resource for building better schools. A Foucauldian discourse analysis of school newsletters reveals that efforts to engage parents also function as a neoliberal strategy designed to govern parents. Using Foucault’s theory of governmentality, I show how the newsletters compel parents to invest in their children’s schooling and judge their value as parents in relation to their ability to produce good neoliberal citizens. I discuss how the newsletters depict ‘good’ parents as those who: (1) do not offer input into schooling; (2) make education a parenting priority and (3) raise good neoliberal citizens. The newsletters represent a strategy for cultivating neoliberal parents who do not ask more from schools and instead demand more of themselves in terms of preparing their children for school and for life. Problems with this approach are that: it asks parents to take up their children’s schooling in ways that push out other family priorities and it shuts down potential collaborations between parents and schools that could challenge neoliberal subjecthood. I call for reformulating discourses of ‘good’ involvement in ways that allow for more equal parent–school partnerships.","PeriodicalId":37109,"journal":{"name":"Power and Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"58 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/17577438211011623","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Power and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438211011623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Ontario Ministry of Education (2010) puts forth parent involvement as a solution for underachievement and as a resource for building better schools. A Foucauldian discourse analysis of school newsletters reveals that efforts to engage parents also function as a neoliberal strategy designed to govern parents. Using Foucault’s theory of governmentality, I show how the newsletters compel parents to invest in their children’s schooling and judge their value as parents in relation to their ability to produce good neoliberal citizens. I discuss how the newsletters depict ‘good’ parents as those who: (1) do not offer input into schooling; (2) make education a parenting priority and (3) raise good neoliberal citizens. The newsletters represent a strategy for cultivating neoliberal parents who do not ask more from schools and instead demand more of themselves in terms of preparing their children for school and for life. Problems with this approach are that: it asks parents to take up their children’s schooling in ways that push out other family priorities and it shuts down potential collaborations between parents and schools that could challenge neoliberal subjecthood. I call for reformulating discourses of ‘good’ involvement in ways that allow for more equal parent–school partnerships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家长参与教育?学校时事通讯的傅语篇分析
安大略省教育部(2010年)提出,家长参与是解决成绩不佳的一种方法,也是建设更好学校的一种资源。傅对学校通讯的话语分析表明,让家长参与进来的努力也是一种旨在治理家长的新自由主义策略。利用福柯的政府心态理论,我展示了时事通讯如何迫使父母投资于孩子的教育,并根据他们培养优秀新自由主义公民的能力来判断他们作为父母的价值。我讨论了时事通讯如何将“好”父母描述为:(1)不为学校教育提供投入;(2) 把教育作为养育子女的优先事项;(3)培养优秀的新自由主义公民。这些时事通讯代表了一种培养新自由主义父母的策略,他们不会向学校提出更多要求,而是在为孩子上学和生活做准备方面要求更多。这种方法的问题在于:它要求家长以排挤其他家庭优先事项的方式接受孩子的教育,并关闭了家长和学校之间可能挑战新自由主义主体地位的潜在合作。我呼吁重新制定“良好”参与的话语,以实现更平等的家长-学校伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Power and Education
Power and Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Navigating classroom challenges and curriculum changes: A qualitative study of an English Teacher’s journey in the Indonesian education system Exploring the mediating role of teacher expectation on whole class participation The role of music in supporting young children’s holistic learning and wellbeing in the context of Froebel’s mother songs Debates in digital pedagogy within prisons Epistemic injustice and unwellness in the classroom: Creating knowledge like we matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1