Integrating safety into the fundamental relations of freeway traffic flows: A conflict-based safety assessment framework

IF 12.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Analytic Methods in Accident Research Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amar.2021.100187
Saeed Mohammadian , Md. Mazharul Haque , Zuduo Zheng , Ashish Bhaskar
{"title":"Integrating safety into the fundamental relations of freeway traffic flows: A conflict-based safety assessment framework","authors":"Saeed Mohammadian ,&nbsp;Md. Mazharul Haque ,&nbsp;Zuduo Zheng ,&nbsp;Ashish Bhaskar","doi":"10.1016/j.amar.2021.100187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous statistical and data-driven modeling frameworks have estimated rear-end crashes and crash-prone events from macroscopic traffic states which are at the heart of traffic flow modelling and control. However, existing frameworks focus on critical events and exclude a vast majority of safer interactions, which are essential information with respect to identifying the trade-offs between congestion management and rear-end crash prevention.</p><p>This study proposes a flexible conflict-based framework to extract safety information from freeway macroscopic traffic state variables (i.e., speed and density) by utilizing the information from all underlying car-following interactions<strong>.</strong> Time spent in conflict (<span><math><mrow><mi>TSC</mi></mrow></math></span>) is introduced as the total time spent by all vehicles in rear-end conflicts based on a given conflict measure and a threshold to be determined flexibly. Using the NGSIM vehicle trajectory dataset, we show that the proportion of stopping distance (<span><math><mrow><mi>PSD</mi></mrow></math></span>) is more desirable than several event-based conflict measures (e.g., time to collision) for describing <span><math><mrow><mi>TSC</mi></mrow></math></span> based on macroscopic state variables. Besides, it is shown that <span><math><mrow><mi>PSD</mi></mrow></math></span> provides explicit safety information about the entire travel time for each macroscopic state because it applies to all car-following interactions.</p><p>This paper proposes a hybrid methodological framework combining probabilistic and machine learning models to develop the relationships between safety and macroscopic state variables within a flexible conflict-based safety assessment framework. At first, probabilistic and Machine learning models are separately developed to estimate <span><math><mrow><mi>PSD</mi></mrow></math></span>-based <span><math><mrow><mi>TSC</mi></mrow></math></span> using only macroscopic stte variables. Each approach is evaluated comprehensively against empirical observations using the NGSIM vehicle trajectory dataset. While the machine learning approach has better predictive accuracy for a fixed rear-end conflict threshold (i.e., <span><math><mrow><mi>PS</mi><msub><mi>D</mi><mrow><mi>cr</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>), the probabilistic approach has a better explaining capability and captures <span><math><mrow><mi>TSC</mi></mrow></math></span> using flexible conflict thresholds. Utilizing the advantages of these two approaches, the proposed hybrid framework satisfactorily predicts <span><math><mrow><mi>TSC</mi></mrow></math></span> corresponding to <span><math><mrow><mi>PSD</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mi>P</mi><mi>S</mi><msub><mi>D</mi><mrow><mi>cr</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> for a wide range of thresholds based only on macroscopic state variables.</p><p>This paper provides an endogenous safety dimension to the fundamental relations of freeway traffic flows that can be utilized to balance freeway traffic flow efficiency and safety. For instance, control studies can utilize the proposed framework to minimize total travel time while also minimizing total time spent in conflict for crash-prone situations such as shockwaves and traffic oscillations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47520,"journal":{"name":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100187"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.amar.2021.100187","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213665721000312","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Numerous statistical and data-driven modeling frameworks have estimated rear-end crashes and crash-prone events from macroscopic traffic states which are at the heart of traffic flow modelling and control. However, existing frameworks focus on critical events and exclude a vast majority of safer interactions, which are essential information with respect to identifying the trade-offs between congestion management and rear-end crash prevention.

This study proposes a flexible conflict-based framework to extract safety information from freeway macroscopic traffic state variables (i.e., speed and density) by utilizing the information from all underlying car-following interactions. Time spent in conflict (TSC) is introduced as the total time spent by all vehicles in rear-end conflicts based on a given conflict measure and a threshold to be determined flexibly. Using the NGSIM vehicle trajectory dataset, we show that the proportion of stopping distance (PSD) is more desirable than several event-based conflict measures (e.g., time to collision) for describing TSC based on macroscopic state variables. Besides, it is shown that PSD provides explicit safety information about the entire travel time for each macroscopic state because it applies to all car-following interactions.

This paper proposes a hybrid methodological framework combining probabilistic and machine learning models to develop the relationships between safety and macroscopic state variables within a flexible conflict-based safety assessment framework. At first, probabilistic and Machine learning models are separately developed to estimate PSD-based TSC using only macroscopic stte variables. Each approach is evaluated comprehensively against empirical observations using the NGSIM vehicle trajectory dataset. While the machine learning approach has better predictive accuracy for a fixed rear-end conflict threshold (i.e., PSDcr), the probabilistic approach has a better explaining capability and captures TSC using flexible conflict thresholds. Utilizing the advantages of these two approaches, the proposed hybrid framework satisfactorily predicts TSC corresponding to PSD<PSDcr for a wide range of thresholds based only on macroscopic state variables.

This paper provides an endogenous safety dimension to the fundamental relations of freeway traffic flows that can be utilized to balance freeway traffic flow efficiency and safety. For instance, control studies can utilize the proposed framework to minimize total travel time while also minimizing total time spent in conflict for crash-prone situations such as shockwaves and traffic oscillations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将安全融入高速公路交通流的基本关系:基于冲突的安全评价框架
许多统计和数据驱动的建模框架已经从宏观交通状态估计了追尾事故和容易发生事故的事件,这是交通流建模和控制的核心。然而,现有框架侧重于关键事件,并排除了绝大多数更安全的交互,这些交互是识别拥塞管理和追尾碰撞预防之间权衡的重要信息。本研究提出了一个灵活的基于冲突的框架,通过利用所有底层车辆跟随交互的信息,从高速公路宏观交通状态变量(即速度和密度)中提取安全信息。引入冲突时间(TSC),即基于给定的冲突度量和灵活确定的阈值,所有车辆在追尾冲突中花费的总时间。使用NGSIM车辆轨迹数据集,我们发现在描述基于宏观状态变量的TSC时,停车距离比例(PSD)比几个基于事件的冲突度量(如碰撞时间)更可取。此外,由于PSD适用于所有的车辆跟随相互作用,因此它提供了每个宏观状态下整个行驶时间的明确安全信息。本文提出了一种结合概率模型和机器学习模型的混合方法框架,以在灵活的基于冲突的安全评估框架中发展安全和宏观状态变量之间的关系。首先,分别开发了概率模型和机器学习模型,仅使用宏观状态变量来估计基于psd的TSC。使用NGSIM车辆轨迹数据集对每种方法进行了综合评估。虽然机器学习方法对于固定的后端冲突阈值(即PSDcr)具有更好的预测准确性,但概率方法具有更好的解释能力,并使用灵活的冲突阈值捕获TSC。利用这两种方法的优点,所提出的混合框架仅基于宏观状态变量就能在大范围阈值下满意地预测出与PSD<PSDcr对应的TSC。本文为高速公路交通流的基本关系提供了一个内生安全维度,可以用来平衡高速公路交通流的效率和安全。例如,控制研究可以利用所提出的框架来最小化总旅行时间,同时也最小化在容易发生碰撞的情况下(如冲击波和交通振荡)所花费的总时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.10
自引率
34.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Analytic Methods in Accident Research is a journal that publishes articles related to the development and application of advanced statistical and econometric methods in studying vehicle crashes and other accidents. The journal aims to demonstrate how these innovative approaches can provide new insights into the factors influencing the occurrence and severity of accidents, thereby offering guidance for implementing appropriate preventive measures. While the journal primarily focuses on the analytic approach, it also accepts articles covering various aspects of transportation safety (such as road, pedestrian, air, rail, and water safety), construction safety, and other areas where human behavior, machine failures, or system failures lead to property damage or bodily harm.
期刊最新文献
Determinants influencing alcohol-related two-vehicle crash severity: A multivariate Bayesian hierarchical random parameters correlated outcomes logit model Effects of sample size on pedestrian crash risk estimation from traffic conflicts using extreme value models Editorial Board A cross-comparison of different extreme value modeling techniques for traffic conflict-based crash risk estimation The role of posted speed limit on pedestrian and bicycle injury severities: An investigation into systematic and unobserved heterogeneities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1