Comparison of Two Kinds of Momentum Control Variables in 3DVAR During Assimilating Low-resolution Observations in a Convective-scale Model: a Case Study of Torrential Rainfall in North China

IF 2.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences Pub Date : 2022-08-29 DOI:10.1007/s13143-022-00290-5
Qiru Dong, Xuelian Wang, Shuiyong Fan, Yinghua Li, Xiaobin Qiu, Lili Liu
{"title":"Comparison of Two Kinds of Momentum Control Variables in 3DVAR During Assimilating Low-resolution Observations in a Convective-scale Model: a Case Study of Torrential Rainfall in North China","authors":"Qiru Dong,&nbsp;Xuelian Wang,&nbsp;Shuiyong Fan,&nbsp;Yinghua Li,&nbsp;Xiaobin Qiu,&nbsp;Lili Liu","doi":"10.1007/s13143-022-00290-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The x and y components of wind (U and V, respectively) are widely used as control variables in radar assimilation; therefore, it is common to choose (U, V) as the control variables for multi-scale data assimilation (DA) in convective-scale. When the model resolution reaches the convective scale, whether (U, V), as the momentum control variables, are still more suitable than the stream function (<i>ψ</i>) and unbalanced velocity potential (<i>χ</i><sub><i>u</i></sub>), it needs to be studied further examination. This study uses 3-km resolution forecast samples to calculate the background error covariance (<b>B</b>) with two different pairs of momentum control variables ((<i>ψ</i>, <i>χ</i><sub><i>u</i></sub>) and (U, V)) by the National Meteorology Center (NMC) method. In single-observation experiments, the analysis wind field is most sensitive to the two pairs of <b>B</b>, and the temperature is insensitive. When using (U, V) as the control variables, the local characteristic is more evident according to vertical and horizontal wind increments. The study assimilates low- resolution conventional observations to compare different momentum control variables, (<i>ψ, χ</i><sub><i>u</i></sub>) and (U, V), in numerical simulation experiments of the torrential rainfall in North China. In addition, the impacts of the two control variables options are also compared in terms of the 15 continuous days of cases in flood season. The main results are as follows: (1) the wind field is the critical difference between the two assimilation experiments at the analysis time. Using (U, V) as the control variables, the analysis field of wind from both the surface and different vertical levels is superior. The analysis field closer fits the wind observation; (2) the use of (U, V) control variables improves the short term (0 ~ 3-h) in surface wind prediction; and (3) the use of (U, V) control variables enhances the 24-h TS (threat score) in moderate rain and heavy rain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8556,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","volume":"58 5","pages":"697 - 713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13143-022-00290-5.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13143-022-00290-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The x and y components of wind (U and V, respectively) are widely used as control variables in radar assimilation; therefore, it is common to choose (U, V) as the control variables for multi-scale data assimilation (DA) in convective-scale. When the model resolution reaches the convective scale, whether (U, V), as the momentum control variables, are still more suitable than the stream function (ψ) and unbalanced velocity potential (χu), it needs to be studied further examination. This study uses 3-km resolution forecast samples to calculate the background error covariance (B) with two different pairs of momentum control variables ((ψ, χu) and (U, V)) by the National Meteorology Center (NMC) method. In single-observation experiments, the analysis wind field is most sensitive to the two pairs of B, and the temperature is insensitive. When using (U, V) as the control variables, the local characteristic is more evident according to vertical and horizontal wind increments. The study assimilates low- resolution conventional observations to compare different momentum control variables, (ψ, χu) and (U, V), in numerical simulation experiments of the torrential rainfall in North China. In addition, the impacts of the two control variables options are also compared in terms of the 15 continuous days of cases in flood season. The main results are as follows: (1) the wind field is the critical difference between the two assimilation experiments at the analysis time. Using (U, V) as the control variables, the analysis field of wind from both the surface and different vertical levels is superior. The analysis field closer fits the wind observation; (2) the use of (U, V) control variables improves the short term (0 ~ 3-h) in surface wind prediction; and (3) the use of (U, V) control variables enhances the 24-h TS (threat score) in moderate rain and heavy rain.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对流尺度模式同化低分辨率观测过程中3DVAR中两种动量控制变量的比较——以华北暴雨为例
风的x分量和y分量(分别为U和V)被广泛用作雷达同化的控制变量;因此,通常选择(U, V)作为对流尺度多尺度数据同化(DA)的控制变量。当模型分辨率达到对流尺度时,(U, V)作为动量控制变量是否仍然比流函数(ψ)和不平衡速度势(χu)更合适,还需要进一步研究检验。本研究利用3公里分辨率的预报样本,采用国家气象中心(NMC)方法计算两对不同动量控制变量((ψ, χu)和(U, V))的背景误差协方差(B)。在单次观测实验中,分析风场对两对B最敏感,对温度不敏感。以(U, V)为控制变量时,垂直风增量和水平风增量的局部特征更为明显。利用低分辨率常规观测资料,比较了华北地区暴雨数值模拟试验中动量控制变量(ψ, χu)和动量控制变量(U, V)的差异。此外,还以汛期连续15 d病例为例,比较了两种控制变量方案的影响。主要结果如下:(1)风场是两个同化实验在分析时刻的临界差值。以(U, V)为控制变量,分析地表风场和不同垂直水平风场均较优。分析场与风的观测更接近;(2) (U, V)控制变量的使用改善了地面风预报的短期(0 ~ 3-h);(3) (U, V)控制变量的使用提高了中雨和暴雨的24 h威胁评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (APJAS) is an international journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (KMS), published fully in English. It has started from 2008 by succeeding the KMS'' former journal, the Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (JKMS), which published a total of 47 volumes as of 2011, in its time-honored tradition since 1965. Since 2008, the APJAS is included in the journal list of Thomson Reuters’ SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded) and also in SCOPUS, the Elsevier Bibliographic Database, indicating the increased awareness and quality of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Variations in Wind Speed Intensity Across China and Their Association with Atmospheric Circulation Patterns Impact of Cloud Vertical Overlap on Cloud Radiative Effect in the Korean Integrated Model (KIM) Seasonal Simulations during Boreal Summer and Winter The Sensitivity of Extreme Rainfall Simulations to WRF Parameters During Two Intense Southwest Monsoon Events in the Philippines Abnormal Climate in 2022 Summer in Korea and Asia Correction to: Effects of Long-term Climate Change on Typhoon Rainfall Associated with Southwesterly Monsoon Flow near Taiwan: Mindulle (2004) and Morakot (2009)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1