Pavement Engineering for Forest Roads

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering Pub Date : 2021-01-15 DOI:10.5552/CROJFE.2021.860
H. Heinimann
{"title":"Pavement Engineering for Forest Roads","authors":"H. Heinimann","doi":"10.5552/CROJFE.2021.860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pavement is an essential component of roads as it carries the traffic and provides the required riding comfort. Considering that numerous forest roads are approaching their end of life, the critical issue is identifying the best rational pavement design methods to reengineer existing and build new pavement structures. The purpose of this contribution was (1) to review the big development lines of pavement systems, (2) to have a critical look at the pavement engineering framework, and (3) to bring selected empirical design equations into a comparable scheme. The study resulted in the following significant findings. First, the Trésaguet and McAdam pavement systems represented the state of the art from the beginning of a formal forest road engineering discipline at the beginning of the 19 century and remained for almost 150 years. Second, the emergence of soil mechanics as a scientific discipline in the 1920s resulted in the optimal grading of aggregates and improvement of soils and aggregates with binders, such as lime, cement, and bitumen. Third, the rational pavement design consists of five essential components: (1) bearing resistance of the subsoil, (2) bearing resistance of the pavement structure, (3) lifecycle traffic volume, (4) uncertainties that amplify deterioration, and (5) the limit state criterion, defining thresholds, above which structural safety and serviceability are no longer met. Fourth, rational, formal pavement design approaches used for forest roads were »downsized« from methodologies developed for high-volume roads, among which the approaches of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) are of primary interest. Fifth, the conversion of the AASHTO ‘93 and USACE ‘70 methods into the SI system indicated that both equations are sensitive to soil bearing resistance, measured in California Bearing Ratio (CBR). However, there is a lack of validation for the AASHTO and USACE equations for forest road conditions. Consequently, a factorial observational study to gain a basis for validation should be developed and implemented. Additionally, the conversion of simple soil bearing resistance measures, such as CBR, into the resilient modulus will be improved.","PeriodicalId":55204,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":"42 1","pages":"91-106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5552/CROJFE.2021.860","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Pavement is an essential component of roads as it carries the traffic and provides the required riding comfort. Considering that numerous forest roads are approaching their end of life, the critical issue is identifying the best rational pavement design methods to reengineer existing and build new pavement structures. The purpose of this contribution was (1) to review the big development lines of pavement systems, (2) to have a critical look at the pavement engineering framework, and (3) to bring selected empirical design equations into a comparable scheme. The study resulted in the following significant findings. First, the Trésaguet and McAdam pavement systems represented the state of the art from the beginning of a formal forest road engineering discipline at the beginning of the 19 century and remained for almost 150 years. Second, the emergence of soil mechanics as a scientific discipline in the 1920s resulted in the optimal grading of aggregates and improvement of soils and aggregates with binders, such as lime, cement, and bitumen. Third, the rational pavement design consists of five essential components: (1) bearing resistance of the subsoil, (2) bearing resistance of the pavement structure, (3) lifecycle traffic volume, (4) uncertainties that amplify deterioration, and (5) the limit state criterion, defining thresholds, above which structural safety and serviceability are no longer met. Fourth, rational, formal pavement design approaches used for forest roads were »downsized« from methodologies developed for high-volume roads, among which the approaches of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) are of primary interest. Fifth, the conversion of the AASHTO ‘93 and USACE ‘70 methods into the SI system indicated that both equations are sensitive to soil bearing resistance, measured in California Bearing Ratio (CBR). However, there is a lack of validation for the AASHTO and USACE equations for forest road conditions. Consequently, a factorial observational study to gain a basis for validation should be developed and implemented. Additionally, the conversion of simple soil bearing resistance measures, such as CBR, into the resilient modulus will be improved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
森林公路路面工程
人行道是道路的重要组成部分,因为它承载着交通并提供所需的乘坐舒适性。考虑到许多森林道路的使用寿命即将结束,关键问题是确定最佳合理的路面设计方法来重新设计现有的路面结构并建造新的路面结构。这一贡献的目的是(1)回顾路面系统的大发展线,(2)对路面工程框架进行批判性的审视,(3)将选定的经验设计方程纳入可比方案。这项研究得出了以下重要发现。首先,从19世纪初正式的森林道路工程学科开始,trsamaguet和McAdam路面系统就代表了最先进的水平,并持续了近150年。其次,20世纪20年代土力学作为一门科学学科的出现,导致了骨料的最佳分级,并改善了土壤和骨料的粘合剂,如石灰、水泥和沥青。第三,合理的路面设计包括五个基本组成部分:(1)底土的承载阻力,(2)路面结构的承载阻力,(3)生命周期交通量,(4)放大劣化的不确定性,以及(5)极限状态准则,定义阈值,超过该阈值,结构的安全性和使用能力将不再满足。第四,用于森林道路的合理、正式的路面设计方法从用于高速公路的方法中“缩小”,其中美国国家公路和运输官员协会(AASHTO)和美国陆军工程兵团(USACE)的方法是主要的兴趣。第五,将AASHTO ' 93和USACE ' 70方法转换为SI系统表明,这两个方程都对以加州承力比(CBR)测量的土壤承载阻力敏感。然而,缺乏对森林道路条件的AASHTO和USACE方程的验证。因此,应开发和实施一项析因观察研究,以获得验证的基础。此外,将CBR等简单的土体承载抗力指标转化为弹性模量将得到改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering (CROJFE) is a refereed journal distributed internationally, publishing original research articles concerning forest engineering, both theoretical and empirical. The journal covers all aspects of forest engineering research, ranging from basic to applied subjects. In addition to research articles, preliminary research notes and subject reviews are published. Journal Subjects and Fields: -Harvesting systems and technologies- Forest biomass and carbon sequestration- Forest road network planning, management and construction- System organization and forest operations- IT technologies and remote sensing- Engineering in urban forestry- Vehicle/machine design and evaluation- Modelling and sustainable management- Eco-efficient technologies in forestry- Ergonomics and work safety
期刊最新文献
Incorporating Simulators into a Training Curriculum for Forestry Equipment Operators Comparing Different Replacement Policies for Logging Machines in Brazil Effects of Boom-Corridor and Selective Thinnings on Harvester Productivity in Dense Small Diameter Pyrenean Oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) Coppices in Spain Soil Characteristics in Oak Lowland Stand Assessment of Tractor Tires Used in Forest Conditions in Terms of Traction Performance and Impact on Ground
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1