An analytical study of precast, prestressed concrete girder spans using 0.7 in. strand

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PCI Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.15554/pcij68.4-02
K. Harries, B. Shahrooz, P. Ball, Tianqiao Liu, Venkata S.S.P. Sathiraju, A. Alabdulkarim, Richard A. Miller, R. Castrodale
{"title":"An analytical study of precast, prestressed concrete girder spans using 0.7 in. strand","authors":"K. Harries, B. Shahrooz, P. Ball, Tianqiao Liu, Venkata S.S.P. Sathiraju, A. Alabdulkarim, Richard A. Miller, R. Castrodale","doi":"10.15554/pcij68.4-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been proposed that 0.7 in. (17.8 mm) diameter prestressing strand be permitted for use in bridge girders. If 0.6 in. (15.2 mm) diameter strand is replaced on a one-to-one basis with 0.7 in. strand, the pretensioning force can be increased by 35%. When designs use 0.7 in. strands as well as high concrete strengths, longer-span prestressed concrete girders may be achieved. An extensive analytical study is presented to assess the maximum girder span lengths that can be achieved when using 0.6 and 0.7 in. strands. A parametric design study with 584 cases was conducted to examine the influence of girder shape and size on the potential benefits of using 0.7 in. strands. A detailed finite element analysis of some of the longer spans achieved was also conducted. The impacts of using 0.7 in. strands on end-region detailing requirements, prestress transfer, and handling and erection stability of long-span girders were examined. Girder span increases of up to 22% were achieved using 0.7 in. strand in place of 0.6 in. strand. The larger pretension forces affected end-region detailing and increased congestion, though all resulting requirements were constructible. The longer spans affected girder stability calculations, and some girder types required a wider top flange to meet stability-related limit states.","PeriodicalId":54637,"journal":{"name":"PCI Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij68.4-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been proposed that 0.7 in. (17.8 mm) diameter prestressing strand be permitted for use in bridge girders. If 0.6 in. (15.2 mm) diameter strand is replaced on a one-to-one basis with 0.7 in. strand, the pretensioning force can be increased by 35%. When designs use 0.7 in. strands as well as high concrete strengths, longer-span prestressed concrete girders may be achieved. An extensive analytical study is presented to assess the maximum girder span lengths that can be achieved when using 0.6 and 0.7 in. strands. A parametric design study with 584 cases was conducted to examine the influence of girder shape and size on the potential benefits of using 0.7 in. strands. A detailed finite element analysis of some of the longer spans achieved was also conducted. The impacts of using 0.7 in. strands on end-region detailing requirements, prestress transfer, and handling and erection stability of long-span girders were examined. Girder span increases of up to 22% were achieved using 0.7 in. strand in place of 0.6 in. strand. The larger pretension forces affected end-region detailing and increased congestion, though all resulting requirements were constructible. The longer spans affected girder stability calculations, and some girder types required a wider top flange to meet stability-related limit states.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预制预应力混凝土梁跨度的分析研究。链
建议允许在桥梁主梁中使用直径为0.7英寸(17.8 mm)的预应力钢绞线。如果将直径为0.6英寸(15.2 mm)的钢绞线一对一地替换为0.7英寸的钢绞线,则预张力可增加35%。当设计使用0.7英寸绞线和高混凝土强度时,可以实现更长跨度的预应力混凝土梁。进行了一项广泛的分析研究,以评估使用0.6和0.7英寸绞线时可以实现的最大主梁跨度长度。对584个案例进行了参数设计研究,以检查主梁形状和尺寸对使用0.7英寸绞线的潜在效益的影响。还对所获得的一些较长跨度进行了详细的有限元分析。研究了使用0.7英寸绞线对大跨度梁端部区域细部要求、预应力传递以及搬运和架设稳定性的影响。使用0.7英寸绞线代替0.6英寸绞线,梁跨度增加了22%。较大的预张力影响了端部区域的细节设计,并增加了堵塞,尽管所有由此产生的要求都是可施工的。跨度较长会影响主梁的稳定性计算,一些主梁类型需要更宽的顶部翼缘来满足稳定性相关的极限状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PCI Journal
PCI Journal 工程技术-结构与建筑技术
自引率
9.10%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultra-high-performance concrete research at PCI Experimental study on the use of compound alkaline materials to solidify lake sediments Axial load behavior of reinforced concrete columns with high-strength steel coiled strips as confinement Supply chain management for modular construction using building information modeling Investigating UHPC in deck bulb-tee girder connections, part 2: Full-scale experimental testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1