Central Banking in Modern Democracies: Private vs. Public Control

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of Economic Analysis Pub Date : 2019-08-25 DOI:10.15353/rea.v11i2.1627
Panagiotis Kotsios
{"title":"Central Banking in Modern Democracies: Private vs. Public Control","authors":"Panagiotis Kotsios","doi":"10.15353/rea.v11i2.1627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central banks are among the most powerful institutions in the world: they are granted a legal monopoly in the issuance of money, set interest rates, monitor the banking sector and generally control a country’s money supply and monetary policy. Their decisions and actions affect directly or indirectly almost every economic activity on the planet. However, most of these institutions decide and act independently from government, they are managed by appointed rather than democratically-elected officials and these officials usually come from the private banking sector. These facts generate questions about the functionality of the system and its efficiency in managing global finance. The goal of this research is to investigate the status of central bank management and ownership across the world today, and examine both philosophically and ethically the arguments for and against central bank independence in modern democracies. The analysis concludes that modern democracies should reassess the structure of central banking and address methods and practices that could possibly jeopardize economic development and the effective functioning of democracy in the long run.","PeriodicalId":42350,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economic Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economic Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15353/rea.v11i2.1627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central banks are among the most powerful institutions in the world: they are granted a legal monopoly in the issuance of money, set interest rates, monitor the banking sector and generally control a country’s money supply and monetary policy. Their decisions and actions affect directly or indirectly almost every economic activity on the planet. However, most of these institutions decide and act independently from government, they are managed by appointed rather than democratically-elected officials and these officials usually come from the private banking sector. These facts generate questions about the functionality of the system and its efficiency in managing global finance. The goal of this research is to investigate the status of central bank management and ownership across the world today, and examine both philosophically and ethically the arguments for and against central bank independence in modern democracies. The analysis concludes that modern democracies should reassess the structure of central banking and address methods and practices that could possibly jeopardize economic development and the effective functioning of democracy in the long run.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代民主国家的中央银行:私人控制与公共控制
中央银行是世界上最强大的机构之一:它们被授予货币发行的法律垄断权,制定利率,监督银行业,并总体控制一个国家的货币供应和货币政策。他们的决定和行动直接或间接影响着地球上几乎每一项经济活动。然而,这些机构大多独立于政府决定和行动,由任命而非民选官员管理,这些官员通常来自私营银行部门。这些事实使人们对该系统的功能及其在管理全球金融方面的效率产生了疑问。这项研究的目的是调查当今世界央行管理和所有权的现状,并从哲学和伦理角度审视现代民主国家中支持和反对央行独立的论点。分析得出的结论是,现代民主国家应该重新评估中央银行的结构,并解决从长远来看可能危及经济发展和民主有效运作的方法和做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Nexus between Causal Macroeconomic Relations in Japan Foreign Direct Investment and the Robustness of Host-Country Commitment The (non) impact of education on marital dissolution Demand for Money in Greece After Euro Area and Policy Uncertainties Ethnic Inequality and Anti-authoritarianism in Sub-Saharan Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1