Detection of land-use change and rapid recovery of vegetation after deforestation in the Congo Basin

IF 1.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Earth Interactions Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1175/ei-d-22-0020.1
Coralie E. Adams, L. Garcia-Carreras
{"title":"Detection of land-use change and rapid recovery of vegetation after deforestation in the Congo Basin","authors":"Coralie E. Adams, L. Garcia-Carreras","doi":"10.1175/ei-d-22-0020.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe Congo Basin is severely understudied compared to other tropical regions; this is partly due to the lack of meteorological stations and the ubiquitous cloudiness hampering the use of remote-sensing products. Clustering of small-scale agricultural deforestation events within the Basin may result in deforestation on scales that are atmospherically important. This study uses 500 m MODIS data and the Global Forest Change dataset (GFC) to detect deforestation at a monthly and sub-km scale and to quantify how deforestation impacts vegetation proxies (VPs) within the Basin, the timescales over which these changes persist, and how they’re affected by the deforestation driver.\nMissing MODIS data has meant that a new method, based on two-date image differencing, was developed to detect deforestation at a monthly scale. Evaluation against the yearly GFC data shows that the highest detection rate was 79% for clearing sizes larger than 500 m2. Recovery to pre-deforestation levels occurred faster than expected; analysis of post-deforestation evolution of the VPs found 66% of locations recovered within a year. Separation by land-cover type also showed unexpected regrowth as over 50% of rural complex and plantation land recovered within a year. The fallow period in the study region was typically short; by the 6th year after the initial deforestation event, ~88% of the locations underwent a further considerable drop. These results show the importance of fine spatial and temporal information to assess Congo Basin deforestation and highlight the large differences in the impacts of land-use change compared to other rainforests.","PeriodicalId":51020,"journal":{"name":"Earth Interactions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/ei-d-22-0020.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Congo Basin is severely understudied compared to other tropical regions; this is partly due to the lack of meteorological stations and the ubiquitous cloudiness hampering the use of remote-sensing products. Clustering of small-scale agricultural deforestation events within the Basin may result in deforestation on scales that are atmospherically important. This study uses 500 m MODIS data and the Global Forest Change dataset (GFC) to detect deforestation at a monthly and sub-km scale and to quantify how deforestation impacts vegetation proxies (VPs) within the Basin, the timescales over which these changes persist, and how they’re affected by the deforestation driver. Missing MODIS data has meant that a new method, based on two-date image differencing, was developed to detect deforestation at a monthly scale. Evaluation against the yearly GFC data shows that the highest detection rate was 79% for clearing sizes larger than 500 m2. Recovery to pre-deforestation levels occurred faster than expected; analysis of post-deforestation evolution of the VPs found 66% of locations recovered within a year. Separation by land-cover type also showed unexpected regrowth as over 50% of rural complex and plantation land recovered within a year. The fallow period in the study region was typically short; by the 6th year after the initial deforestation event, ~88% of the locations underwent a further considerable drop. These results show the importance of fine spatial and temporal information to assess Congo Basin deforestation and highlight the large differences in the impacts of land-use change compared to other rainforests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刚果盆地森林砍伐后土地利用变化和植被快速恢复的检测
与其他热带地区相比,刚果盆地的研究严重不足;这在一定程度上是由于缺乏气象站和普遍存在的云层阻碍了遥感产品的使用。盆地内小规模农业毁林事件的聚集可能导致大气中重要规模的毁林。这项研究使用500米MODIS数据和全球森林变化数据集(GFC)来检测每月和次公里尺度的森林砍伐,并量化森林砍伐如何影响盆地内的植被指标(VP),这些变化持续的时间尺度,以及它们如何受到森林砍伐驱动因素的影响。MODIS数据的缺失意味着一种基于两天图像差异的新方法被开发出来,用于每月检测森林砍伐情况。根据年度GFC数据进行的评估显示,对于大于500 m2的空地,最高检测率为79%。恢复到毁林前水平的速度比预期的要快;对森林砍伐后VP演变的分析发现,66%的位置在一年内恢复。按土地覆盖类型划分也显示出出乎意料的再生,超过50%的农村综合体和种植园土地在一年内恢复。研究区域的休耕期通常较短;在最初的森林砍伐事件发生后的第6年,约88%的地区出现了进一步的大幅下降。这些结果表明了精细的空间和时间信息对评估刚果盆地森林砍伐的重要性,并强调了与其他雨林相比,土地利用变化的影响存在巨大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth Interactions
Earth Interactions 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Publishes research on the interactions among the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, cryosphere, and lithosphere, including, but not limited to, research on human impacts, such as land cover change, irrigation, dams/reservoirs, urbanization, pollution, and landslides. Earth Interactions is a joint publication of the American Meteorological Society, American Geophysical Union, and American Association of Geographers.
期刊最新文献
Runoff variability in the Truckee-Carson River basin from tree rings and a water balance model Effects of payment for ecosystem services and tourism on conservation and development: Trade-off or synergistic? The Role of Climate Change in the Proliferation of Freshwater Harmful Algal Blooms in Inland Waterbodies of the United States Geographic Analysis of the Vulnerability of U.S. Lakes to Cyanobacterial Blooms under Future Climate Decadal variability in spring sea-ice concentration linked to summer temperature and NDVI on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1