The Impact of China's Fdi and Fdi From Other Sources on Growth in Sub-Sahara Africa Through Export Upgrading

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1080/10800379.2019.12097349
M. Ngundu, N. Ngepah
{"title":"The Impact of China's Fdi and Fdi From Other Sources on Growth in Sub-Sahara Africa Through Export Upgrading","authors":"M. Ngundu, N. Ngepah","doi":"10.1080/10800379.2019.12097349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper seeks to analyse how FDI from China, US, EU, and the rest of Asia transmit to growth in sub-Sahara Africa through export upgrading for the period (2003-2012). Terms-of-trade is utilized as a proxy for export upgrading. We develop a theoretical argument to show that countries with worsening (less than 1%) terms-of-trade are associated with poor industrialization as a result they can hardly improve quality and quantity of their products for export market, vis-à-vis. In this respect, this study contributes to existing literature in two ways. First, we investigate if technology embodied in FDI from the above-mentioned sources can enhance quantity and quality improvements of export commodities in sub-Sahara Africa. Second, we account for industrial policy heterogeneity of sub-Sahara African countries in order to determine the threshold level at which FDI-induced export upgrading can contribute positively to growth. Using both 2SLS and PTR models, our results reveal that FDI from China and the rest of Asia does not bear significant impact on growth in sub-Sahara Africa through export upgrading. However, PTR analysis demonstrates that FDI from US and EU seem to have a significant negative impact only below a threshold of 1.08%. As the terms-of-trade improves beyond 1.08%, the estimated coefficients of both FDI from US and EU turn positive, albeit insignificant. We conclude that sub-Sahara African countries are far yet to reach a threshold at which FDI-induced export upgrading can contribute positively to growth.","PeriodicalId":55873,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","volume":"43 1","pages":"1 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10800379.2019.12097349","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10800379.2019.12097349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper seeks to analyse how FDI from China, US, EU, and the rest of Asia transmit to growth in sub-Sahara Africa through export upgrading for the period (2003-2012). Terms-of-trade is utilized as a proxy for export upgrading. We develop a theoretical argument to show that countries with worsening (less than 1%) terms-of-trade are associated with poor industrialization as a result they can hardly improve quality and quantity of their products for export market, vis-à-vis. In this respect, this study contributes to existing literature in two ways. First, we investigate if technology embodied in FDI from the above-mentioned sources can enhance quantity and quality improvements of export commodities in sub-Sahara Africa. Second, we account for industrial policy heterogeneity of sub-Sahara African countries in order to determine the threshold level at which FDI-induced export upgrading can contribute positively to growth. Using both 2SLS and PTR models, our results reveal that FDI from China and the rest of Asia does not bear significant impact on growth in sub-Sahara Africa through export upgrading. However, PTR analysis demonstrates that FDI from US and EU seem to have a significant negative impact only below a threshold of 1.08%. As the terms-of-trade improves beyond 1.08%, the estimated coefficients of both FDI from US and EU turn positive, albeit insignificant. We conclude that sub-Sahara African countries are far yet to reach a threshold at which FDI-induced export upgrading can contribute positively to growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从出口升级看中国对外直接投资和其他来源对外直接投资对撒哈拉以南非洲增长的影响
摘要本文试图分析2003-2012年期间,来自中国、美国、欧盟和亚洲其他国家的外国直接投资如何通过出口升级转化为撒哈拉以南非洲的增长。贸易条件被用作出口升级的代理。我们提出了一个理论论点,表明贸易条件恶化(低于1%)的国家与工业化程度低有关,因此它们很难提高出口市场产品的质量和数量。在这方面,本研究从两个方面对现有文献做出了贡献。首先,我们调查了来自上述来源的外国直接投资所包含的技术是否可以促进撒哈拉以南非洲出口商品的数量和质量的提高。其次,我们考虑了撒哈拉以南非洲国家的产业政策异质性,以确定外国直接投资导致的出口升级对增长有积极贡献的阈值水平。使用2SLS和PTR模型,我们的结果表明,来自中国和亚洲其他地区的外国直接投资不会通过出口升级对撒哈拉以南非洲的增长产生重大影响。然而,PTR分析表明,来自美国和欧盟的外国直接投资似乎只在1.08%的阈值以下产生了显著的负面影响。随着贸易条件的改善超过1.08%,来自美国或欧盟的外国投资的估计系数都变为正,尽管不重要。我们的结论是,撒哈拉以南非洲国家远未达到外国直接投资推动的出口升级能够对增长作出积极贡献的门槛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Published by the Bureau for Economic Research and the Graduate School of Business, University of Stellenbosch. Articles in the field of study of Economics (in the widest sense of the word).
期刊最新文献
Structural estimates of the South African sacrifice ratio Central Bank Independence and Inflation in India: The Role of Financial Development Threshold effects of regional fiscal stress index on employment Benchmarking an allocation to the foreign Sub-portfolio from a South African perspective Assessment of the impact of government response measures on the spread of COVID-19: panel data evidence for 50 countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1