Gaslighting LGBTQ+ Individuals: Correlates of Gaslighting Experiences, Gaslighters’ Characteristics, and Gaslighting Techniques

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1080/10510974.2023.2209605
Yachao Li, Jennifer A. Samp
{"title":"Gaslighting LGBTQ+ Individuals: Correlates of Gaslighting Experiences, Gaslighters’ Characteristics, and Gaslighting Techniques","authors":"Yachao Li, Jennifer A. Samp","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2023.2209605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT LGBTQ+ individuals have been victims of gaslighting, a form of psychological manipulation and emotional abuse that causes minority people to question their sense of self, doubt the validity of their identities, and internalize heteronormativity. This study explores personal and relational correlates of LGBTQ+ people’s gaslighting experiences, examines demographic and relational characteristics of gaslighters, and identifies common gaslighting techniques. Results (N = 365 U.S. LGBTQ+ adults) showed that LGBTQ+ people’s demographic factors were generally not related to their gaslighting experiences. Participants having an affirmative LGBTQ+ identity and experiencing higher relational power reported less gaslighting. Yet, gaslighting experiences were correlated with adverse mental and physical health consequences and lower relational satisfaction. Fathers were identified as the most typical gaslighters, followed by mothers and male friends, and lastly female friends. Respondents identified various overt gaslighting tactics, including devaluing and questioning the significance and validity of LGBTQ+ identities, purposefully forgetting what has occurred, and controlling conversations. Few participants mentioned more subtle forms of gaslighting. Thus, gaslighting is a serious challenge for LGBTQ+ people. More efforts should be devoted to helping people better prevent, recognize, and cope with gaslighting behaviors across relational contexts.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"356 - 376"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2209605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT LGBTQ+ individuals have been victims of gaslighting, a form of psychological manipulation and emotional abuse that causes minority people to question their sense of self, doubt the validity of their identities, and internalize heteronormativity. This study explores personal and relational correlates of LGBTQ+ people’s gaslighting experiences, examines demographic and relational characteristics of gaslighters, and identifies common gaslighting techniques. Results (N = 365 U.S. LGBTQ+ adults) showed that LGBTQ+ people’s demographic factors were generally not related to their gaslighting experiences. Participants having an affirmative LGBTQ+ identity and experiencing higher relational power reported less gaslighting. Yet, gaslighting experiences were correlated with adverse mental and physical health consequences and lower relational satisfaction. Fathers were identified as the most typical gaslighters, followed by mothers and male friends, and lastly female friends. Respondents identified various overt gaslighting tactics, including devaluing and questioning the significance and validity of LGBTQ+ identities, purposefully forgetting what has occurred, and controlling conversations. Few participants mentioned more subtle forms of gaslighting. Thus, gaslighting is a serious challenge for LGBTQ+ people. More efforts should be devoted to helping people better prevent, recognize, and cope with gaslighting behaviors across relational contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
煤气照明LGBTQ+个人:煤气照明体验、煤气打火机特征和煤气照明技术的相关性
LGBTQ+个体一直是煤气灯的受害者,这是一种心理操纵和情感虐待的形式,导致少数群体质疑他们的自我意识,怀疑他们身份的有效性,并内化异性恋规范。本研究探讨了LGBTQ+人群煤气灯体验的个人和关系相关性,考察了煤气灯使用者的人口统计学和关系特征,并确定了常见的煤气灯技术。结果(N = 365)LGBTQ+成年人)表明,LGBTQ+人群的人口统计学因素与煤气灯经历普遍无关。拥有肯定的LGBTQ+身份和更高的关系权力的参与者报告的煤气灯较少。然而,煤气灯经历与不良的心理和身体健康后果以及较低的关系满意度相关。父亲被认为是最典型的煤气灶制造者,其次是母亲和男性朋友,最后是女性朋友。受访者指出了各种公开的“煤气灯”策略,包括贬低和质疑LGBTQ+身份的重要性和有效性,故意忘记已经发生的事情,以及控制对话。几乎没有参与者提到更微妙的煤气灯形式。因此,煤气灯对LGBTQ+人群来说是一个严峻的挑战。更多的努力应该致力于帮助人们更好地预防、识别和处理跨关系环境的煤气灯行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Communicative Ecologies of Displaced Youth Ways of Connecting in Protracted Situations of Encampment Editorial for the Special Issue: “Communication Research on Coping Strategies During Global Crises” Mediated Contact with LGBTQ Characters: Associations Between Recognizability, Parasocial Friendship, Wishful Identification, and LGBTQ Prejudice Closing the Gaps: An Examination of Student Self-Sabotage, a Willingness to Ask for Help, and Personal-Enacted and Enacted-Relational Identity Gaps in the Student-Instructor Relationship Media Network and Citizen Journalism: The Transition from Agenda Setting to Agenda Loop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1