The Problem of the Left-Right Divide in Modern Russia Through the Lens of Social Constructivism

Konstantin V. Zhigadlo
{"title":"The Problem of the Left-Right Divide in Modern Russia Through the Lens of Social Constructivism","authors":"Konstantin V. Zhigadlo","doi":"10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-2-423-433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By the beginning of the 2010s, Russia has developed a party system and an electoral culture for which the ideological spectrum is not critically important. However, the high-profile political processes, the events of recent years and the leap in the development of social media have contributed to the reactualization of the ideological spectrum in the field of unconventional politics. At the same time, new social movements were formed. In this regard, questions about the left-right divide and about the semantic content of the concepts of left and right wings themselves acquire new relevance. The author of the article tries to determine which Russian ideological and social movements, political parties and associations of a different type today can be attributed to each wing of the left-right continuum, and what are the essential divisions between the different sides of it today. For this purpose, a discourse analysis of the publications of certain public opinion leaders who directly relate themselves to one or another camp in social media was carried out. Various interviews and speeches of these individuals, as well as program documents of some parties and movements were also used for this analysis. In order to clearly identify various personalities and groups on the basis of their position in the ideological spectrum, the author relied on the methodology of social constructivism. The author concludes that the conceptualization of the right-wing established in Russian political science, referring this concept mainly to liberals, is largely outdated by now. There are splits within the left and right movements themselves along the line of attitude to the state and etatism, no less acute and fundamental than the very division between these movements.","PeriodicalId":32346,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Political Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-2-423-433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By the beginning of the 2010s, Russia has developed a party system and an electoral culture for which the ideological spectrum is not critically important. However, the high-profile political processes, the events of recent years and the leap in the development of social media have contributed to the reactualization of the ideological spectrum in the field of unconventional politics. At the same time, new social movements were formed. In this regard, questions about the left-right divide and about the semantic content of the concepts of left and right wings themselves acquire new relevance. The author of the article tries to determine which Russian ideological and social movements, political parties and associations of a different type today can be attributed to each wing of the left-right continuum, and what are the essential divisions between the different sides of it today. For this purpose, a discourse analysis of the publications of certain public opinion leaders who directly relate themselves to one or another camp in social media was carried out. Various interviews and speeches of these individuals, as well as program documents of some parties and movements were also used for this analysis. In order to clearly identify various personalities and groups on the basis of their position in the ideological spectrum, the author relied on the methodology of social constructivism. The author concludes that the conceptualization of the right-wing established in Russian political science, referring this concept mainly to liberals, is largely outdated by now. There are splits within the left and right movements themselves along the line of attitude to the state and etatism, no less acute and fundamental than the very division between these movements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会建构主义视角下的近代俄罗斯左右分裂问题
到2010年代初,俄罗斯已经形成了一种政党制度和选举文化,在这种制度和文化中,意识形态并不是至关重要的。然而,备受瞩目的政治进程、近年来发生的事件以及社交媒体的飞跃发展,促成了非传统政治领域中意识形态频谱的重新实现。与此同时,新的社会运动形成了。在这方面,关于左右分歧的问题以及关于左翼和右翼概念本身的语义内容的问题获得了新的相关性。这篇文章的作者试图确定今天俄罗斯的意识形态和社会运动、不同类型的政党和协会可以归因于左右连续体的每一个派别,以及今天不同方面之间的本质分歧是什么。为此,本文对与某一阵营或另一阵营有直接关系的某些舆论领袖在社交媒体上发表的文章进行了话语分析。这些人的各种访谈和演讲,以及一些政党和运动的纲领文件也被用于分析。为了根据不同的人物和群体在意识形态光谱中的位置来清晰地识别他们,作者运用了社会建构主义的方法论。作者的结论是,在俄罗斯政治科学中建立的右翼概念,主要指的是自由主义者,现在基本上已经过时了。在左翼和右翼运动内部,围绕着对国家和自由主义的态度,存在着分歧,其尖锐和根本不亚于这些运动之间的分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Political Administration VS Political Competition Under Neo-Authoritarian Rule Political Theology of Contingency: Reading Materialists with Carl Schmitt New dilemmas of the «just war» theory Integration of Migrants Through the Lens of a Constructivist Approach to Ethnicity Political Science in Search of New Approaches: Introducing the Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1