Connaissances et contrôle exécutif : deux facteurs cognitifs de protection contre le vieillissement de la mémoire épisodique ?

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychologie Francaise Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psfr.2017.03.001
S. Gombart , S. Fay , M. Isingrini
{"title":"Connaissances et contrôle exécutif : deux facteurs cognitifs de protection contre le vieillissement de la mémoire épisodique ?","authors":"S. Gombart ,&nbsp;S. Fay ,&nbsp;M. Isingrini","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2017.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study we refer to Craik and Bialystok's model distinguishing the “knowledge” (cultural learning experience that forms the basis for knowledge of the world) and the “executive control” (set of operations that control and regulate cognitive performance) as two main factors susceptible accounting for the age-related negative effects on the cognitive functioning, and for a possible age-related protective effect. Thus, the aim of the present study was to examine the possible protective effect of these two factors on the age-related decline in a cued-recall task. Four age groups of participants (20–39 years, 40–59 years, 60–74 years and 75–90 years) were administered with a word-stem cued-recall test to assess episodic memory, a “vocabulary” sub-test of the WAIS-R to assess knowledge and a reading span test to assess control. Results showed an age-related effect on the episodic memory, the control performance and the knowledge measure, indicating that performance decreases with age. A GLM analysis revealed a positive effect of the knowledge and the control factors on the cued-recall performance, and interaction between age and the knowledge factor resulting from a positive effect of the knowledge level only for the youngest group of participants (20–39 years). Furthermore, results revealed an interaction between age and the control factor, indicating a positive effect of the control level for the two oldest groups of participants (60–74 years and 75–90 years). These results suggest that, contrary to the knowledge, the control factor could be an effective protection against the age-related negative effects on the episodic memory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":"66 2","pages":"Pages 127-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psfr.2017.03.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298417300134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this study we refer to Craik and Bialystok's model distinguishing the “knowledge” (cultural learning experience that forms the basis for knowledge of the world) and the “executive control” (set of operations that control and regulate cognitive performance) as two main factors susceptible accounting for the age-related negative effects on the cognitive functioning, and for a possible age-related protective effect. Thus, the aim of the present study was to examine the possible protective effect of these two factors on the age-related decline in a cued-recall task. Four age groups of participants (20–39 years, 40–59 years, 60–74 years and 75–90 years) were administered with a word-stem cued-recall test to assess episodic memory, a “vocabulary” sub-test of the WAIS-R to assess knowledge and a reading span test to assess control. Results showed an age-related effect on the episodic memory, the control performance and the knowledge measure, indicating that performance decreases with age. A GLM analysis revealed a positive effect of the knowledge and the control factors on the cued-recall performance, and interaction between age and the knowledge factor resulting from a positive effect of the knowledge level only for the youngest group of participants (20–39 years). Furthermore, results revealed an interaction between age and the control factor, indicating a positive effect of the control level for the two oldest groups of participants (60–74 years and 75–90 years). These results suggest that, contrary to the knowledge, the control factor could be an effective protection against the age-related negative effects on the episodic memory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识和执行控制:防止情景记忆老化的两个认知因素?
在本研究中,我们参考了Craik和Bialystok的模型,将“知识”(构成世界知识基础的文化学习经验)和“执行控制”(控制和调节认知表现的一套操作)作为两个主要因素,可以解释与年龄相关的认知功能负面影响,并可能产生与年龄相关的保护作用。因此,本研究的目的是检验这两个因素对提示回忆任务中与年龄相关的衰退的可能保护作用。4个年龄组的参与者(20-39岁、40-59岁、60-74岁和75-90岁)接受了单词干线索回忆测试来评估情景记忆,WAIS-R的“词汇”子测试来评估知识,阅读广度测试来评估控制。结果显示,情景记忆、控制表现和知识测量均存在年龄相关的影响,表明表现随年龄增长而下降。GLM分析显示,知识和控制因素对线索回忆的表现有正向影响,而年龄和知识因素之间的交互作用是由知识水平的正向影响引起的,仅在最年轻的参与者组(20-39岁)。此外,结果还揭示了年龄与控制因素之间的相互作用,表明控制水平对两组年龄最大的参与者(60-74岁和75-90岁)有积极影响。这些结果表明,与以往的认识相反,控制因素可以有效地防止年龄对情景记忆的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologie Francaise
Psychologie Francaise PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Influence of sex on judgments of an aggressive North African woman Quelle formation des savoirs sur le cancer et la chimiothérapie orale en contexte d’ETP ? Apports d’une approche psychosociale articulée à un dispositif de triangulation méthodologique Étude exploratoire de profils d’enseignants à risque de burnout : association avec les processus de coping et le sentiment d’auto-efficacité Adaptation française et propriétés psychométriques de l’échelle d’utilisabilité perçue des sites web « Design-oriented evaluation of perceived usability (DEEP) »
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1