Wellbeing research needs more cultural approaches

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Journal of Wellbeing Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.5502/ijw.v12i4.1965
R. Biswas-Diener
{"title":"Wellbeing research needs more cultural approaches","authors":"R. Biswas-Diener","doi":"10.5502/ijw.v12i4.1965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a long-standing tradition in social science research on wellbeing, in which scientists create national rankings of happiness. Traditionally, Nordic countries such as Sweden and Denmark tend to top these lists. Such rankings are interesting as dinner table conversation and they are perennially reported on by the media. They also reflect a specific mindset about wellbeing research. Namely, that cross-cultural comparisons are interesting, that they are possible to make, and that nations can serve as reasonable proxies for culture. Although there is an element of truth to all three suppositions, there are also legitimate limitations to them. This article argues that positive psychology and wellbeing researchers should adopt a cultural as well as a cross-cultural perspective. This requires increasing sophistication in A) the understanding of culture itself, B) the methods for investigating it, and C) the complexities of cultural research.Examples and recommendations are provided.","PeriodicalId":36390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wellbeing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wellbeing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v12i4.1965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There is a long-standing tradition in social science research on wellbeing, in which scientists create national rankings of happiness. Traditionally, Nordic countries such as Sweden and Denmark tend to top these lists. Such rankings are interesting as dinner table conversation and they are perennially reported on by the media. They also reflect a specific mindset about wellbeing research. Namely, that cross-cultural comparisons are interesting, that they are possible to make, and that nations can serve as reasonable proxies for culture. Although there is an element of truth to all three suppositions, there are also legitimate limitations to them. This article argues that positive psychology and wellbeing researchers should adopt a cultural as well as a cross-cultural perspective. This requires increasing sophistication in A) the understanding of culture itself, B) the methods for investigating it, and C) the complexities of cultural research.Examples and recommendations are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康研究需要更多的文化方法
关于幸福的社会科学研究有一个长期的传统,即科学家们对国家的幸福程度进行排名。传统上,瑞典和丹麦等北欧国家往往在这些榜单上名列前茅。这样的排名就像餐桌上的谈话一样有趣,媒体也会不断报道。它们也反映了一种关于健康研究的特定心态。也就是说,跨文化比较是有趣的,是可能的,国家可以作为文化的合理代表。尽管这三种假设都有一定的道理,但它们也有合理的局限性。本文认为,积极心理学和幸福感研究者应采取文化和跨文化的视角。这需要在以下几个方面提高复杂性:A)对文化本身的理解,B)调查文化的方法,以及C)文化研究的复杂性。给出了示例和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Wellbeing
International Journal of Wellbeing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
A provisional global comparison framework: One hundred psychologically salient ways of conceptualizing and evaluating the world Beyond a single story: The heterogeneity of human flourishing in 22 countries The brief thriving scale: Assessing the ability to learn, grow, and find benefits in stressful events Well-being and ill-being on campus Brief computerised self-help interventions, the “Miracle Question,” and the moderating effects of openness-to-experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1