A review of research with co-design methods in health education

Q2 Social Sciences Open Education Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1515/edu-2022-0017
Francisco Iniesto, Koula Charitonos, A. Littlejohn
{"title":"A review of research with co-design methods in health education","authors":"Francisco Iniesto, Koula Charitonos, A. Littlejohn","doi":"10.1515/edu-2022-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Studies using co-design methods require the meaningful involvement of stakeholders in creating new knowledge and harnessing, mobilising, and transferring existing knowledge to support comprehensive and long-term solutions. In the health sector, co-design methodology is seen as a way of supporting and engaging local communities in critical decision-making about their health. However, little is known about which specific co-design methods have been adopted, used, and implemented within health education contexts. To address this gap, this paper presents a literature review of co-design methods used to design and implement health education interventions. This rapid evidence assessment (REA) was carried out by identifying 53 papers categorised into four themes: methods, stages, stakeholders, and outcomes. We examined specific co-design methods used in health education stages to support the involvement of stakeholders, second, we reviewed the outcomes of the application of these methods. Based on the review findings, the paper reflects two areas: first, the review shows that there are a wide number of co-design methods being used to support stakeholder collaboration to design health care services as products and processes. Second, there is no clear way co-design methods are evaluated for their outcomes. This review of literature contributes an evidence base to support the future development and use of co-design in health contexts by organising relevant literature into coherent themes in ways that can inform future research.","PeriodicalId":33645,"journal":{"name":"Open Education Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"273 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Education Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2022-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Studies using co-design methods require the meaningful involvement of stakeholders in creating new knowledge and harnessing, mobilising, and transferring existing knowledge to support comprehensive and long-term solutions. In the health sector, co-design methodology is seen as a way of supporting and engaging local communities in critical decision-making about their health. However, little is known about which specific co-design methods have been adopted, used, and implemented within health education contexts. To address this gap, this paper presents a literature review of co-design methods used to design and implement health education interventions. This rapid evidence assessment (REA) was carried out by identifying 53 papers categorised into four themes: methods, stages, stakeholders, and outcomes. We examined specific co-design methods used in health education stages to support the involvement of stakeholders, second, we reviewed the outcomes of the application of these methods. Based on the review findings, the paper reflects two areas: first, the review shows that there are a wide number of co-design methods being used to support stakeholder collaboration to design health care services as products and processes. Second, there is no clear way co-design methods are evaluated for their outcomes. This review of literature contributes an evidence base to support the future development and use of co-design in health contexts by organising relevant literature into coherent themes in ways that can inform future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协同设计方法在健康教育中的研究综述
摘要使用共同设计方法的研究需要利益相关者有意义地参与创造新知识,利用、动员和转移现有知识,以支持全面和长期的解决方案。在卫生部门,共同设计方法被视为支持和促使当地社区参与有关其健康的关键决策的一种方式。然而,对于在健康教育背景下采用、使用和实施了哪些具体的共同设计方法,我们知之甚少。为了解决这一差距,本文对用于设计和实施健康教育干预措施的共同设计方法进行了文献综述。这种快速证据评估(REA)是通过识别53篇论文来进行的,这些论文分为四个主题:方法、阶段、利益相关者和结果。我们研究了健康教育阶段用于支持利益相关者参与的具体联合设计方法,其次,我们审查了这些方法的应用结果。根据审查结果,该论文反映了两个领域:首先,审查表明,有大量的共同设计方法可用于支持利益相关者合作,将医疗保健服务设计为产品和流程。其次,没有明确的方法来评估共同设计方法的结果。这篇文献综述通过将相关文献组织成连贯的主题,为未来的研究提供信息,为支持联合设计在健康环境中的未来发展和使用提供了证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Education Studies
Open Education Studies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Why are These Problems Still Unresolved?” Those Pending Problems, and Neglected Contradictions in Online Classroom in the Post-COVID-19 Era Limits of Metacognitive Prompts for Confidence Judgments in an Interactive Learning Environment Fostering Creativity in Higher Education Institution: A Systematic Review (2018–2022) The Flipped Classroom Optimized Through Gamification and Team-Based Learning Deconstructing Teacher Engagement Techniques for Pre-service Teachers through Explicitly Teaching and Applying “Noticing” in Video Observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1