Anarchist and Anarchistic Anti-Systemic Movements in World-Systems Perspective

IF 1 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Journal of World-Systems Research Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.5195/jwsr.2022.1097
Spencer Louis Potiker, Dana M. Williams, Jake Alimahomed-Wilson
{"title":"Anarchist and Anarchistic Anti-Systemic Movements in World-Systems Perspective","authors":"Spencer Louis Potiker, Dana M. Williams, Jake Alimahomed-Wilson","doi":"10.5195/jwsr.2022.1097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While world-systems anti-systemic movement scholarship has briefly acknowledged the existence of anti-state “cultural” movements—namely, autonomous indigenous movements in the periphery and anarchist worker movements in the core and semi-periphery—it relegates them to secondary importance to statist “political” movements. In this paper, we provide an intervention in the world-systems anti-systemic movements literature by centering anti-state movements in our analysis. In order to investigate the mechanisms essential for anti-state, anti-systemic movements over the longue durée of the world-system, we operationalize a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) using nine cases of non-state spaces from different geographies and historical time periods throughout the world-system. We use a Boolean crisp set, or binary approach, denoting the presence, or absence of factors to determine the pathways that lead to the variation between explicitly anarchist and implicitly anarchistic movements as well as short-term or long-term non-state spaces established by anti-state movements. We find that the core and semi-periphery classification of anarchist movements is false. We also find that non-state spaces succeed when they are not repressed by statist anti-systemic movements or core imperial nation-states. In effect, the anti-systemic political actor replicates the logic of the core nation-state it claims to be opposed to when it comes to its repression of non-state spaces and movements. Prior to the “liberal geoculture” (1848–1968), even core states had difficulty repressing non-state spaces, and after the liberal geoculture semi-periphery and periphery states have had difficulty repressing non-state spaces.","PeriodicalId":36882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World-Systems Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World-Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2022.1097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While world-systems anti-systemic movement scholarship has briefly acknowledged the existence of anti-state “cultural” movements—namely, autonomous indigenous movements in the periphery and anarchist worker movements in the core and semi-periphery—it relegates them to secondary importance to statist “political” movements. In this paper, we provide an intervention in the world-systems anti-systemic movements literature by centering anti-state movements in our analysis. In order to investigate the mechanisms essential for anti-state, anti-systemic movements over the longue durée of the world-system, we operationalize a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) using nine cases of non-state spaces from different geographies and historical time periods throughout the world-system. We use a Boolean crisp set, or binary approach, denoting the presence, or absence of factors to determine the pathways that lead to the variation between explicitly anarchist and implicitly anarchistic movements as well as short-term or long-term non-state spaces established by anti-state movements. We find that the core and semi-periphery classification of anarchist movements is false. We also find that non-state spaces succeed when they are not repressed by statist anti-systemic movements or core imperial nation-states. In effect, the anti-systemic political actor replicates the logic of the core nation-state it claims to be opposed to when it comes to its repression of non-state spaces and movements. Prior to the “liberal geoculture” (1848–1968), even core states had difficulty repressing non-state spaces, and after the liberal geoculture semi-periphery and periphery states have had difficulty repressing non-state spaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世界体系视角下的无政府主义和无政府主义反体制运动
虽然世界体系反体制运动学者已经简要地承认了反国家“文化”运动的存在——即外围的自治土著运动和核心和半外围的无政府主义工人运动——但它将它们的重要性降至国家主义“政治”运动的次要地位。在本文中,我们以反国家运动为中心,在我们的分析中提供了对世界体系反系统运动文献的干预。为了研究世界体系长期发展过程中反国家、反体制运动的基本机制,我们利用来自世界体系不同地理和历史时期的9个非国家空间案例进行了定性比较分析(QCA)。我们使用布尔清晰集或二元方法,表示存在或不存在的因素,以确定导致明确无政府主义和隐含无政府主义运动之间变化的途径,以及由反国家运动建立的短期或长期非国家空间。我们发现无政府主义运动的核心和半外围分类是错误的。我们还发现,当非国家空间不受中央集权的反体制运动或核心帝国主义民族国家的压制时,它们就会成功。实际上,当涉及到对非国家空间和运动的镇压时,反体制政治行动者复制了它声称反对的核心民族国家的逻辑。在“自由主义地缘文化”(1848-1968)之前,即使是核心国家也难以压制非国家空间,而在自由主义地缘文化之后,半外围和外围国家也难以压制非国家空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of World-Systems Research
Journal of World-Systems Research Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cancelling Apocalypse by Risking to Envision Analyzing Global Commodity Chains and Social Reproduction Weathering the Crisis Europe in a State of Denial Travesty of “Anti-Imperialism"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1