Evaluation of Useful Biomechanical Parameters On Scoliosis Using Finite Element Method

M. Khademi, A. Nikoo
{"title":"Evaluation of Useful Biomechanical Parameters On Scoliosis Using Finite Element Method","authors":"M. Khademi, A. Nikoo","doi":"10.34172/ICNJ.2020.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Scoliosis is a deformity of the vertebral column, and shape-changing and deformation of the spine are some critical factors that can cause this abnormality. This condition causes some problems like deflection of the spine in the coronal plane toward medial or lateral. Cobb angle is a measurement for the investigation of the severity of this condition. There are several effective therapies suggested for the reduction of the Cobb angle for patients who has this abnormality. It has suggested that before applying external forces to correct this condition, biomechanical evaluation of this deformity, can be useful during diagnosis. Methods: The purpose of this study is the evaluation of Cobb angle correction using external forces. For this aim first, the dimensional data of the patient’s vertebrae are extracted from CT-scan images using Mimics software, and the vertebral column modeled in Catia software for finite element analysis (FEA). Afterward, the model was imported into Abaqus software to evaluate the effect of forces on the spine model. The study was done by assuming two cases for the spine, one-piece (without a nucleus) and two-piece (with a nucleus) intervertebral disc. Results: After studying the results of this simulation, it concluded that after applying gravity force to these two cases, the percentage of Cobb angle’s reduction was about 0.05 for a two-piece disc and about -0.18 for the one-piece disc. Therefore, the two-piece disc assumption was better for analyzing this parameter. The results of maximum displacement and von misses stress show that the two-piece disc is accurate. Conclusion: In order to investigate which analysis is appropriate to be selected, choosing a twopiece intervertebral disc model is superlative. Whether our goal is only to examine the stress which is present in the patient model, choosing a one-piece disc is a more optimal duo to take much less time.","PeriodicalId":33222,"journal":{"name":"International Clinical Neuroscience Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Clinical Neuroscience Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ICNJ.2020.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Scoliosis is a deformity of the vertebral column, and shape-changing and deformation of the spine are some critical factors that can cause this abnormality. This condition causes some problems like deflection of the spine in the coronal plane toward medial or lateral. Cobb angle is a measurement for the investigation of the severity of this condition. There are several effective therapies suggested for the reduction of the Cobb angle for patients who has this abnormality. It has suggested that before applying external forces to correct this condition, biomechanical evaluation of this deformity, can be useful during diagnosis. Methods: The purpose of this study is the evaluation of Cobb angle correction using external forces. For this aim first, the dimensional data of the patient’s vertebrae are extracted from CT-scan images using Mimics software, and the vertebral column modeled in Catia software for finite element analysis (FEA). Afterward, the model was imported into Abaqus software to evaluate the effect of forces on the spine model. The study was done by assuming two cases for the spine, one-piece (without a nucleus) and two-piece (with a nucleus) intervertebral disc. Results: After studying the results of this simulation, it concluded that after applying gravity force to these two cases, the percentage of Cobb angle’s reduction was about 0.05 for a two-piece disc and about -0.18 for the one-piece disc. Therefore, the two-piece disc assumption was better for analyzing this parameter. The results of maximum displacement and von misses stress show that the two-piece disc is accurate. Conclusion: In order to investigate which analysis is appropriate to be selected, choosing a twopiece intervertebral disc model is superlative. Whether our goal is only to examine the stress which is present in the patient model, choosing a one-piece disc is a more optimal duo to take much less time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用有限元法评价脊柱侧凸有用的生物力学参数
背景:脊柱侧弯是一种脊柱畸形,脊柱的形状变化和变形是导致这种畸形的一些关键因素。这种情况会导致一些问题,如脊柱在冠状面向内侧或外侧偏转。Cobb角是用于调查这种情况严重程度的一种测量方法。对于有这种异常的患者,有几种有效的治疗方法可以减少Cobb角。有人建议,在施加外力纠正这种情况之前,对这种畸形进行生物力学评估,在诊断过程中是有用的。方法:本研究的目的是评估使用外力的Cobb角校正。为此,首先,使用Mimics软件从CT扫描图像中提取患者椎骨的尺寸数据,并在Catia软件中对脊柱建模,用于有限元分析(FEA)。然后,将该模型导入Abaqus软件中,以评估力对脊椎模型的影响。这项研究是通过假设脊柱有两种情况进行的,一种是一体式(无髓核)椎间盘,另一种是两件式(有髓核)间盘。结果:在研究了该模拟的结果后,得出结论,在对这两种情况施加重力后,Cobb角减小的百分比对于两件式椎间盘约为0.05,对于单件式椎间盘为-0.18。因此,两件式圆盘假设更适合分析该参数。最大位移和von漏应力的计算结果表明,两片式阀瓣是准确的。结论:为了研究选择哪种分析是合适的,选择两块椎间盘模型是最好的。无论我们的目标只是检查患者模型中存在的压力,选择一体式椎间盘都是一个更优化的组合,可以花费更少的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Difficulties in Diagnosis and Operation Associated With Lumbar Intradural Disc Herniation: A Case Report EEG-Based Effective Connectivity Analysis for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Detection Using Color-Coded Granger-Causality Images and Custom Convolutional Neural Network The Relationship Between Arachnoid Cysts and the Subarachnoid Space by Hounsfield Unit Value in Computed Tomography Scans: Identification of Isolated and Communicating Arachnoid Cysts in a Cohort Study The Positive Effect of Atropa belladonna on Inflammatory Cytokines in the Animal Model of Multiple Sclerosis Unexpected Outcomes for Headache Under Evaluation; A Case Series of Four Cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1