HOW RELIGION MATTERS: ISLAMOPHOBIA, TERRORISM AND TWITTER

IF 0.5 0 RELIGION Politics and Religion Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-07 DOI:10.54561/prj1402383d
Didem Doğanyılmaz Duman, Ece Unur
{"title":"HOW RELIGION MATTERS: ISLAMOPHOBIA, TERRORISM AND TWITTER","authors":"Didem Doğanyılmaz Duman, Ece Unur","doi":"10.54561/prj1402383d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twitter, as one of the most used social media tools, helps construction of virtual communities and provides members with opportunity to reflect opinions, thoughts, emotions etc. With respect to the said feature of it, an analysis of public reaction over Twitter was conducted regarding four terrorist attacks in Beirut, Paris of November 2015 and Babil, Brussels of March 2016. The analysis was based on public hashtags created with city name plus the word ‘attack(s)’ - #ParisAttacks, #BeirutAttacks, #BrusselsAttacks, and #BabilAttack; and 9998 tweets posted following four days from the day of the attack were examined. For the purpose of the set examination, qualitative content analysis method was used and posted tweets were categorized with respect to their general meanings. In order to back up this research, it is also essential to introduce the terms terrorism, perpetrator of the aforementioned attacks, the ISIS, and the concepts of worthy and unworthy victims.","PeriodicalId":41271,"journal":{"name":"Politics and Religion Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and Religion Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54561/prj1402383d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twitter, as one of the most used social media tools, helps construction of virtual communities and provides members with opportunity to reflect opinions, thoughts, emotions etc. With respect to the said feature of it, an analysis of public reaction over Twitter was conducted regarding four terrorist attacks in Beirut, Paris of November 2015 and Babil, Brussels of March 2016. The analysis was based on public hashtags created with city name plus the word ‘attack(s)’ - #ParisAttacks, #BeirutAttacks, #BrusselsAttacks, and #BabilAttack; and 9998 tweets posted following four days from the day of the attack were examined. For the purpose of the set examination, qualitative content analysis method was used and posted tweets were categorized with respect to their general meanings. In order to back up this research, it is also essential to introduce the terms terrorism, perpetrator of the aforementioned attacks, the ISIS, and the concepts of worthy and unworthy victims.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教如何重要:伊斯兰恐惧症、恐怖主义和推特
推特作为最常用的社交媒体工具之一,有助于虚拟社区的建设,并为成员提供反映意见、想法和情绪等的机会。关于推特的上述功能,对2015年11月发生在巴黎贝鲁特和2016年3月发生在布鲁塞尔巴比尔的四起恐怖袭击事件的公众反应进行了分析。该分析基于用城市名称加上单词“攻击”创建的公共标签——#ParisAttacks、#BeirutAttacks、#BrusselsAttacks和#BabilAttack;对袭击发生四天后发布的9998条推文进行了审查。为了进行集合检验,使用了定性内容分析方法,并根据发布的推文的一般含义对其进行了分类。为了支持这项研究,还必须介绍恐怖主义、上述袭击的肇事者、ISIS以及值得和不值得的受害者的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Word from the Guest Editor: Politics and Religion in Israel A Word from the Editor-in-Chief: Religious Wars in XXI century – A Challenge for Politology of Religion Between Separatism and Pragmatism: Judaism as National Identity in the Haredi Political Discourse Gender, State and Religion: Palestinian Feminist Politics “On the Side of the Good”: Political Alliances of Religious Zionists and Israeli Conservatism in the Quest to Hegemony
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1