IDENTIFYING THE ETHICAL ISSUES IN TWITTER: A KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION FOR ONTOLOGY

IF 1.1 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Malaysian Journal of Computer Science Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.22452/mjcs.sp2021no2.7
Mohamad Hafizuddin Mohamed Najid, Z. Zulkifli, R. Othman, Rohaiza Rokis, A. A. Salahuddin
{"title":"IDENTIFYING THE ETHICAL ISSUES IN TWITTER: A KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION FOR ONTOLOGY","authors":"Mohamad Hafizuddin Mohamed Najid, Z. Zulkifli, R. Othman, Rohaiza Rokis, A. A. Salahuddin","doi":"10.22452/mjcs.sp2021no2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media is an open platform to communicate, share and exchange information freely. This uncontrolled exchanged information carries out both negative and positive impacts in others’ lives. In this regard, this study aims to identify ethical issues on this information in line with Ibn Khaldun’s ethical considerations. Out of many other social networking sites, Twitter has been identified as one of the most popular microblogging social networking platforms. Using a simple algorithm in R programming and 43 keywords based on Ibn Khaldun’s thoughts, 1075 public tweets have been extracted from Twitter as a sample of ethical issues. The sentiment analysis in Parallel Dots was performed on the collected tweets, and it was discovered that 700 of the tweets are positive statements, 229 are neutral statements, and 146 are negative statements. Having done the validation process on these sentiments, the study proposed these identified ethical issues from tweets as a domain in developing ontology relationships with Ibn Khaldun’s thoughts. In this process, further study can be carried on with wider data from various sources beyond the limitation of this study. Thus, a semantic database could serve as a guideline for SNS ethical issues based on Ibn Khaldun’s thoughts.","PeriodicalId":49894,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Computer Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/mjcs.sp2021no2.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media is an open platform to communicate, share and exchange information freely. This uncontrolled exchanged information carries out both negative and positive impacts in others’ lives. In this regard, this study aims to identify ethical issues on this information in line with Ibn Khaldun’s ethical considerations. Out of many other social networking sites, Twitter has been identified as one of the most popular microblogging social networking platforms. Using a simple algorithm in R programming and 43 keywords based on Ibn Khaldun’s thoughts, 1075 public tweets have been extracted from Twitter as a sample of ethical issues. The sentiment analysis in Parallel Dots was performed on the collected tweets, and it was discovered that 700 of the tweets are positive statements, 229 are neutral statements, and 146 are negative statements. Having done the validation process on these sentiments, the study proposed these identified ethical issues from tweets as a domain in developing ontology relationships with Ibn Khaldun’s thoughts. In this process, further study can be carried on with wider data from various sources beyond the limitation of this study. Thus, a semantic database could serve as a guideline for SNS ethical issues based on Ibn Khaldun’s thoughts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别TWITTER中的伦理问题:本体论的知识获取
社交媒体是一个自由交流、分享和交换信息的开放平台。这种不受控制的信息交流对他人的生活产生了负面和积极的影响。在这方面,本研究旨在根据伊本·哈尔顿的伦理考虑,确定这些信息中的伦理问题。在许多其他社交网站中,推特被认为是最受欢迎的微博社交网络平台之一。使用R编程中的一个简单算法和基于Ibn Khaldun思想的43个关键词,从推特中提取了1075条公共推文作为道德问题的样本。对收集到的推文进行了Parallel Dots中的情绪分析,发现700条推文是积极的陈述,229条是中立的陈述,146条是消极的陈述。在对这些情绪进行了验证之后,该研究提出,推文中的这些伦理问题是与伊本·哈尔顿思想发展本体关系的一个领域。在这个过程中,可以在本研究的限制之外,利用来自各种来源的更广泛的数据进行进一步的研究。因此,基于伊本·哈尔顿的思想,语义数据库可以作为SNS伦理问题的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Computer Science
Malaysian Journal of Computer Science COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Journal of Computer Science (ISSN 0127-9084) is published four times a year in January, April, July and October by the Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, since 1985. Over the years, the journal has gained popularity and the number of paper submissions has increased steadily. The rigorous reviews from the referees have helped in ensuring that the high standard of the journal is maintained. The objectives are to promote exchange of information and knowledge in research work, new inventions/developments of Computer Science and on the use of Information Technology towards the structuring of an information-rich society and to assist the academic staff from local and foreign universities, business and industrial sectors, government departments and academic institutions on publishing research results and studies in Computer Science and Information Technology through a scholarly publication.  The journal is being indexed and abstracted by Clarivate Analytics'' Web of Science and Elsevier''s Scopus
期刊最新文献
METHODICAL EVALUATION OF HEALTHCARE INTELLIGENCE FOR HUMAN LIFE DISEASE DETECTION DISINFORMATION DETECTION ABOUT ISLAMIC ISSUES ON SOCIAL MEDIA USING DEEP LEARNING TECHNIQUES ENHANCING SECURITY OF RFID-ENABLED IOT SUPPLY CHAIN A TRACE CLUSTERING FRAMEWORK FOR IMPROVING THE BEHAVIORAL AND STRUCTURAL QUALITY OF PROCESS MODELS IN PROCESS MINING IMPROVING COVERAGE AND NOVELTY OF ABSTRACTIVE TEXT SUMMARIZATION USING TRANSFER LEARNING AND DIVIDE AND CONQUER APPROACHES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1