Bad Gurley Feminism: The Myth of Post-War Domesticity

IF 0.3 Q4 WOMENS STUDIES Journal of Feminist Scholarship Pub Date : 2019-02-01 DOI:10.23860/jfs.2019.16.03
E. Holliday-Karre
{"title":"Bad Gurley Feminism: The Myth of Post-War Domesticity","authors":"E. Holliday-Karre","doi":"10.23860/jfs.2019.16.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to feminist history, the 1950s constitute a lapse in feminist literature as women in the post-war era were ushered into the realm of domesticity. In this article I argue that this perceived literary “gap” was both created and perpetuated by feminist historians and scholars who insist that Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique (1963) was the defining feminist text of the time. I offer an alternative discourse to that of Friedan by presenting feminist writers who challenge, rather than adopt, masculine ideology as the means to women’s empowerment. I end by encouraging feminists to allow commonly dismissed feminists from the 1950s, like Cosmopolitan editor Helen Gurley Brown and domestic humor writers Shirley Jackson and Jean Kerr, into the feminist canon.","PeriodicalId":42387,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feminist Scholarship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feminist Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23860/jfs.2019.16.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to feminist history, the 1950s constitute a lapse in feminist literature as women in the post-war era were ushered into the realm of domesticity. In this article I argue that this perceived literary “gap” was both created and perpetuated by feminist historians and scholars who insist that Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique (1963) was the defining feminist text of the time. I offer an alternative discourse to that of Friedan by presenting feminist writers who challenge, rather than adopt, masculine ideology as the means to women’s empowerment. I end by encouraging feminists to allow commonly dismissed feminists from the 1950s, like Cosmopolitan editor Helen Gurley Brown and domestic humor writers Shirley Jackson and Jean Kerr, into the feminist canon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴德·格利女权主义:战后家庭生活的神话
根据女权主义的历史,20世纪50年代是战后女性进入家庭生活领域的女权主义文学的失误。在这篇文章中,我认为这种被感知到的文学“差距”是由女权主义历史学家和学者们创造和延续的,他们坚持认为贝蒂·弗里丹的《女性的奥秘》(1963)是当时定义女权主义的文本。我提供了一种与弗里丹不同的论述,介绍了一些女权主义作家,他们挑战(而不是采纳)男性意识形态,将其作为赋予女性权力的手段。最后,我鼓励女权主义者允许20世纪50年代被普遍忽视的女权主义者,比如《Cosmopolitan》杂志的编辑海伦·格利·布朗(Helen Gurley Brown)和国内幽默作家雪莉·杰克逊(Shirley Jackson)和吉恩·克尔(Jean Kerr),进入女权主义经典。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
’90s “It Girls”: Britpop at the Postfeminist Intermezzo Criticizing Paywall Publishing, or Integrating Open Access into Feminist Movement The Centrality of Community in Education about Gender-Based Violence Quiet Rebellions: An Interview with Gothataone Moeng Inner Martyrdom: Deconstructing the Sacrificial Female Subject in The Republic of Georgia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1