An Analysis of the Relationship between Resilience and Clinical Competence in Nurses : Descriptive-analytical Study

P. Aziznejadroshan, S. Goliroshan, Mojtaba Qanbari Qalehsari, S. Hosseini, Z. Geraili, Fatemeh Shaker Zavardehi
{"title":"An Analysis of the Relationship between Resilience and Clinical Competence in Nurses : Descriptive-analytical Study","authors":"P. Aziznejadroshan, S. Goliroshan, Mojtaba Qanbari Qalehsari, S. Hosseini, Z. Geraili, Fatemeh Shaker Zavardehi","doi":"10.15566/cjgh.v9i1.547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nObjective: Resilience and clinical competence are two important components of providing nursing care to patients. The goal was to determine the correlation between clinical competence and resilience in the nurses at Babol University of Medical Sciences. \nMethods: This descriptive and correlational study was conducted in 2019-20. A total of 424 nurses working in the intensive care units and general wards of six hospitals affiliated with Babol University of Medical Sciences were selected using the stratified sampling technique. Liou’s Nursing Clinical Competence Questionnaire was used to assess the clinical competence of the nurses, and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale was used to assess the nurses’ resilience. The descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, t student, and one-way ANOVA methods were used in data analysis. \nResults: The mean score on the seven dimensions of clinical competence was high (174.8624.19). The nurses had the highest mean scores on “clinical care” and “management and leadership” dimensions (4.7731.50, 4.728.61) in the order mentioned. They also had the lowest mean scores on the “mentoring and teaching” and “professional progress” dimensions in the order mentioned (3.5319.10, 3.4119.14). The meanstandard deviation of the nurses’ resilience score was 73.3612.66. The results of Pearson’s correlation test indicated a positive significant relationship between all clinical competence dimensions and nurses’ resilience (p<0.001, r=0.493). \nConclusion: Given the strong relationship between resilience and clinical competence, nursing managers are recommended to carry out proper planning to improve the clinical competence and resilience of nurses.","PeriodicalId":52275,"journal":{"name":"Christian Journal for Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Journal for Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v9i1.547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

  Objective: Resilience and clinical competence are two important components of providing nursing care to patients. The goal was to determine the correlation between clinical competence and resilience in the nurses at Babol University of Medical Sciences. Methods: This descriptive and correlational study was conducted in 2019-20. A total of 424 nurses working in the intensive care units and general wards of six hospitals affiliated with Babol University of Medical Sciences were selected using the stratified sampling technique. Liou’s Nursing Clinical Competence Questionnaire was used to assess the clinical competence of the nurses, and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale was used to assess the nurses’ resilience. The descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, t student, and one-way ANOVA methods were used in data analysis. Results: The mean score on the seven dimensions of clinical competence was high (174.8624.19). The nurses had the highest mean scores on “clinical care” and “management and leadership” dimensions (4.7731.50, 4.728.61) in the order mentioned. They also had the lowest mean scores on the “mentoring and teaching” and “professional progress” dimensions in the order mentioned (3.5319.10, 3.4119.14). The meanstandard deviation of the nurses’ resilience score was 73.3612.66. The results of Pearson’s correlation test indicated a positive significant relationship between all clinical competence dimensions and nurses’ resilience (p<0.001, r=0.493). Conclusion: Given the strong relationship between resilience and clinical competence, nursing managers are recommended to carry out proper planning to improve the clinical competence and resilience of nurses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士心理弹性与临床胜任力的关系分析:描述性分析研究
目的:心理弹性和临床能力是护理患者的重要组成部分。目的是确定临床能力和心理弹性之间的相关性在巴博尔医科大学的护士。方法:本研究于2019- 2020年进行描述性和相关性研究。采用分层抽样方法,选取巴博勒医科大学附属六家医院重症监护室和普通病房的424名护士。采用刘氏护理临床能力问卷对护士的临床能力进行评估,采用康纳-戴维森弹性量表对护士的弹性进行评估。数据分析采用描述性统计、Pearson相关系数、t student和单因素方差分析方法。结果:临床能力七个维度的平均得分较高,为174.8624.19分。护士在“临床护理”及“管理及领导”各维度的平均得分最高(分别为4.7731.50、4.728.61)。他们在“指导与教学”和“专业进步”维度上的平均得分也最低(3.5319.10,3.4119.14)。护士心理弹性评分的平均标准差为73.3612.66。Pearson相关检验结果显示,临床胜任力各维度与护士心理弹性呈显著正相关(p<0.001, r=0.493)。结论:鉴于心理弹性与临床胜任力之间存在较强的关系,建议护理管理者对护士的临床胜任力和心理弹性进行适当的规划,提高护士的临床胜任力和心理弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Christian Journal for Global Health
Christian Journal for Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Difference in Clinical Knowledge Between Staff Employed at Faith-based and Public Facilities in Malawi Faith-based Healthcare in Africa: Stylized Facts from Data Collected by the Catholic Church Effective Localization: Case Study of a Faith-based Health Partnership in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe Faith Based Healthcare in Africa Health Status Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Risk Perceptions in Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1