A Cross-cultural Analysis of Two China-US Game Cases and Tobacco Control Compliance

4区 医学 Tobacco Regulatory Science Pub Date : 2021-11-03 DOI:10.18001/trs.7.6.3
Yuan Lingyu, Dexin Tian
{"title":"A Cross-cultural Analysis of Two China-US Game Cases and Tobacco Control Compliance","authors":"Yuan Lingyu, Dexin Tian","doi":"10.18001/trs.7.6.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This paper aims at exploring the China-US relations by analyzing the communication strategies and game intentions in two case studies and the cultural roots herein. Guided by the water and game theory for intercultural communication (WGICC) and cultural analyses,\n this study has found that in Case 1, China and the US have established initial win-win ties because of a mutually-beneficial trade system, the US intention to gain international recognition, and the romantic expectations of each other. In Case 2, both countries have suffered great losses due\n to the US pursuit of reinforced national identity and revitalized conservatism which set the stage for an endless line of plots to contain China. In return, China has been practicing a tit-for-tat strategy backed up with its grand ambition to forge a community with a shared future for mankind\n and ready to fight against containment and suppression from both the US and its allies. This study suggests an interactive pattern of win-win cooperation based on common needs and similar interests, and loss-loss confrontation based on real and imaginary fear while manifesting that the greatest\n Dao is expressed in the simplest terms. The findings can shed lighton appreciating China’s efforts in such domestic campaigns as tobacco control compliance and Covid-19 prevention and its diplomatic relations with other nations.","PeriodicalId":48513,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Regulatory Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Regulatory Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18001/trs.7.6.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This paper aims at exploring the China-US relations by analyzing the communication strategies and game intentions in two case studies and the cultural roots herein. Guided by the water and game theory for intercultural communication (WGICC) and cultural analyses, this study has found that in Case 1, China and the US have established initial win-win ties because of a mutually-beneficial trade system, the US intention to gain international recognition, and the romantic expectations of each other. In Case 2, both countries have suffered great losses due to the US pursuit of reinforced national identity and revitalized conservatism which set the stage for an endless line of plots to contain China. In return, China has been practicing a tit-for-tat strategy backed up with its grand ambition to forge a community with a shared future for mankind and ready to fight against containment and suppression from both the US and its allies. This study suggests an interactive pattern of win-win cooperation based on common needs and similar interests, and loss-loss confrontation based on real and imaginary fear while manifesting that the greatest Dao is expressed in the simplest terms. The findings can shed lighton appreciating China’s efforts in such domestic campaigns as tobacco control compliance and Covid-19 prevention and its diplomatic relations with other nations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个中美博弈案例的跨文化分析与烟草控制合规
目的:本文旨在通过两个案例分析中美关系的沟通策略和博弈意图,以及本文的文化根源,来探讨中美关系。本研究以跨文化交际的水与博弈理论(WGICC)和文化分析为指导,发现在案例1中,中美建立了最初的双赢关系,这是因为互惠的贸易体系、美国获得国际认可的意图以及彼此的浪漫期望。在案例2中,由于美国追求强化的民族认同和振兴的保守主义,两国都遭受了巨大损失,这为遏制中国的无休止阴谋埋下了伏笔。作为回报,中国一直在实施针锋相对的战略,其宏伟目标是构建人类命运共同体,并准备与美国及其盟友的遏制和镇压作斗争。本研究提出了一种基于共同需求和相似利益的双赢合作和基于真实和想象的恐惧的损失-损失对抗的互动模式,同时表明最大的道是用最简单的语言表达的。这些发现可以让人们对中国在烟草控制合规和新冠肺炎预防等国内运动中所做的努力以及与其他国家的外交关系有所了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on the Influence Mechanism of Implicit Incentive on Employee's Territorial Marking Behaviors – the Moderating Effect of Recognition Expectation Study on the Non-linear Effect of Tourism Industry Agglomeration on Economic Growth in China——Based on Inter-provincial Panel Data Measurement, Distribution Characteristics and Regional Differences Analysis of Eco-efficiency Development in Tobacco Planting Zone Coefficients Calculation of Laurent Series in the Neighborhood of Complex Variable Function Poles Discussion on the Governance Structure of "Transitional Communities" and Its Countermeasures Under Meta-Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1