Multi-level benchmark system for sustainability reporting: EU experience for Ukraine

I. Makarenko, Serhiy Makarenko
{"title":"Multi-level benchmark system for sustainability reporting: EU experience for Ukraine","authors":"I. Makarenko, Serhiy Makarenko","doi":"10.21511/afc.04(1).2023.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes the key European benchmarks in the field of compiling and submitting sustainability reports. The analysis concerns the disclosure of their features in the context of considering the introduction in Ukraine to increase transparency, accountability and investment attractiveness of Ukrainian enterprises. Based on content and comparative analyses, a comparison was made of the key provisions of sustainability reporting issued by various standards-setters (ISSB (International Sustainability Standards Board), EFRAG (European Financial Reporting Advisory Group), SEC (The United States Securities and Exchange Commission), GRI (Global Reporting Initiative), and IIRC (International Integrated Reporting Council)) as a methodological level of the system of such benchmarks. The global impact of the specified benchmarks is complemented by an analysis of the impact of Directive 2014/95/EU (Non-Financial Reporting Directive – NFRD) and the new Directive 2022/2464/EU (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive – CSRD) on the introduction of the sustainability reporting. It is proved that in the context of the formation of the Ukrainian accounting system on the way to European integration, the transposition of the requirements of these Directives is the first step towards streamlining the regulatory framework for companies’ sustainability reporting. A two-level sustainability reporting benchmark system is presented, which at the operational level is based on the EU directives on disclosure of non-financial information and sustainability reporting, and at the methodological level – on the European Sustainability Reporting Standards and other generally accepted standards.\nAcknowledgment Inna Makarenko gratefully acknowledges support from the Supreme Council of Ukraine (0122U201796).","PeriodicalId":52967,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and Financial Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and Financial Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/afc.04(1).2023.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The paper analyzes the key European benchmarks in the field of compiling and submitting sustainability reports. The analysis concerns the disclosure of their features in the context of considering the introduction in Ukraine to increase transparency, accountability and investment attractiveness of Ukrainian enterprises. Based on content and comparative analyses, a comparison was made of the key provisions of sustainability reporting issued by various standards-setters (ISSB (International Sustainability Standards Board), EFRAG (European Financial Reporting Advisory Group), SEC (The United States Securities and Exchange Commission), GRI (Global Reporting Initiative), and IIRC (International Integrated Reporting Council)) as a methodological level of the system of such benchmarks. The global impact of the specified benchmarks is complemented by an analysis of the impact of Directive 2014/95/EU (Non-Financial Reporting Directive – NFRD) and the new Directive 2022/2464/EU (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive – CSRD) on the introduction of the sustainability reporting. It is proved that in the context of the formation of the Ukrainian accounting system on the way to European integration, the transposition of the requirements of these Directives is the first step towards streamlining the regulatory framework for companies’ sustainability reporting. A two-level sustainability reporting benchmark system is presented, which at the operational level is based on the EU directives on disclosure of non-financial information and sustainability reporting, and at the methodological level – on the European Sustainability Reporting Standards and other generally accepted standards. Acknowledgment Inna Makarenko gratefully acknowledges support from the Supreme Council of Ukraine (0122U201796).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续性报告的多级基准系统:欧盟对乌克兰的经验
本文分析了欧洲在编制和提交可持续发展报告方面的主要基准。分析涉及在考虑在乌克兰引进以增加乌克兰企业的透明度、问责制和投资吸引力的背景下披露其特点。在内容和比较分析的基础上,对各标准制定机构(ISSB(国际可持续发展标准委员会)、EFRAG(欧洲财务报告咨询小组)、SEC(美国证券交易委员会)、GRI(全球报告倡议组织)和IIRC(国际综合报告委员会))发布的可持续发展报告的关键条款进行了比较,作为此类基准体系的方法层面。指定基准的全球影响辅以对2014/95/EU指令(非财务报告指令- NFRD)和新指令2022/2464/EU(企业可持续发展报告指令- CSRD)对引入可持续发展报告的影响的分析。事实证明,在乌克兰会计制度形成的背景下,在欧洲一体化的道路上,这些指令的要求的转换是朝着简化公司可持续发展报告的监管框架迈出的第一步。提出了一个两级可持续发展报告基准系统,该系统在操作层面以欧盟关于披露非财务信息和可持续发展报告的指令为基础,在方法层面以欧洲可持续发展报告标准和其他普遍接受的标准为基础。Inna Makarenko感谢乌克兰最高委员会(0122U201796)的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Usefulness of accounting information systems for small business profitability in South Africa: A systematic literature review Analyzing the external auditor’s perception of the impact of IFRS 15 on the profitability and performance of emerging market companies Does neglecting the instruments of financial failure play a role in the bankruptcy of companies? Emerging trends and research focal points of information technologies for financial control and accounting at the state and corporate level: Bibliometric research and visualization Multi-level benchmark system for sustainability reporting: EU experience for Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1