Cities, States, and Citizens in the Atlantic World: Towards a New Narrative

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY Journal of Early American History Pub Date : 2020-12-18 DOI:10.1163/18770703-10020001
E. Hart, R. Allison, Paul Musselwhite, D. Richter, Mark A. Peterson
{"title":"Cities, States, and Citizens in the Atlantic World: Towards a New Narrative","authors":"E. Hart, R. Allison, Paul Musselwhite, D. Richter, Mark A. Peterson","doi":"10.1163/18770703-10020001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn his book Mark Peterson presents an innovative perspective on the development of Boston and its New England hinterland as an early modern city-state. His purpose was to tell the story of Boston in its own right, shedding US national history as the dominant interpretative framework. The four reviewers pick up various strands, focusing, among others, on the validity of the city-state concept, especially as Boston did not become an incorporated city until 1822, criticize what one of them sees as an attempt to return New England to the center of early American historiography, and assess whether the city-state model can be applied elsewhere in early America and in the Atlantic World. In his response, Peterson argues that his aim was not to propose a city-state paradigm for comparative purposes, but rather to employ the city-state concept as the best way to explain Boston’s historical trajectory over two centuries, and to highlight the contingency of US history.","PeriodicalId":53896,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early American History","volume":"10 1","pages":"179-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18770703-10020001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his book Mark Peterson presents an innovative perspective on the development of Boston and its New England hinterland as an early modern city-state. His purpose was to tell the story of Boston in its own right, shedding US national history as the dominant interpretative framework. The four reviewers pick up various strands, focusing, among others, on the validity of the city-state concept, especially as Boston did not become an incorporated city until 1822, criticize what one of them sees as an attempt to return New England to the center of early American historiography, and assess whether the city-state model can be applied elsewhere in early America and in the Atlantic World. In his response, Peterson argues that his aim was not to propose a city-state paradigm for comparative purposes, but rather to employ the city-state concept as the best way to explain Boston’s historical trajectory over two centuries, and to highlight the contingency of US history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大西洋世界的城市、州和公民:走向新的叙事
在他的书中,马克·彼得森对波士顿及其新英格兰腹地作为一个早期现代城邦的发展提出了一种创新的观点。他的目的是讲述波士顿本身的故事,摆脱美国国家历史作为主要的解释框架。这四位评论家从不同的角度出发,尤其关注城邦概念的有效性,特别是波士顿直到1822年才成为一个合并城市,他们批评了其中一位认为是试图将新英格兰带回早期美国史学中心的做法,并评估了城邦模式是否可以应用于早期美国和大西洋世界的其他地方。在他的回应中,彼得森认为他的目的不是为了比较而提出一个城邦范式,而是将城邦概念作为解释波士顿两个世纪以来历史轨迹的最佳方式,并强调美国历史的偶然性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
From Castilla del Oro to the Royal Court and Back: Cities and Political Representation in the Spanish Atlantic, 1510–1573 No “Terror To Good Works, But To The Evil” From Scarlet to Gold The Jeffersonian Republicans and the Democratic Movement An Atlantic Slave Trade Stretching from the Mediterranean to the Caribbean and Beyond
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1