Fractured system, fractured care: The experiences of Canadian women with chronic pelvic pain waiting for interprofessional pain care

IF 0.6 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI:10.1177/22840265221148786
Rachael Bosma, Emeralda Burke, Nida Mustafa, T. Di Renna, Rosemary A Wilson
{"title":"Fractured system, fractured care: The experiences of Canadian women with chronic pelvic pain waiting for interprofessional pain care","authors":"Rachael Bosma, Emeralda Burke, Nida Mustafa, T. Di Renna, Rosemary A Wilson","doi":"10.1177/22840265221148786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common disorder in women that includes complex interactions between biological, psychological, and social factors. Accessibility to interprofessional, biopsychosocial CPP care remains a challenge for many patients. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the experiences of women using health services for CPP care and the impact of waiting for interprofessional CPP care. This study explores the perceptions and experiences of Canadian women with CPP interacting with the health system while waiting for interprofessional CPP care. Methods: Our qualitative study included women with CPP waiting for interprofessional care in Ontario, Canada. Data were obtained through semi-structured interviews which were transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively using established methods for thematic analysis. Results: Ten women (median age of 38.5 years, age range 28–57) participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews. Three main themes were identified: (1) feeling adrift in the health system, (2) feeling “On hold,” uncertain, and in need of guidance, and (3) feeling reliant on a system that does not understand. Within these themes, women with CPP describe tangible strategies and recommendations for improving health system navigation and care. Conclusion: Our study highlights the need for improved access to interprofessional CPP programs, enhanced and targeted training for health professionals in CPP management, and better health system navigation support. Specific recommendations were provided from the perspectives of women with CPP and included providing information on what to expect and prepare for their appointment and engaging patients in education resources while they wait.","PeriodicalId":15725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","volume":"15 1","pages":"27 - 33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22840265221148786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common disorder in women that includes complex interactions between biological, psychological, and social factors. Accessibility to interprofessional, biopsychosocial CPP care remains a challenge for many patients. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the experiences of women using health services for CPP care and the impact of waiting for interprofessional CPP care. This study explores the perceptions and experiences of Canadian women with CPP interacting with the health system while waiting for interprofessional CPP care. Methods: Our qualitative study included women with CPP waiting for interprofessional care in Ontario, Canada. Data were obtained through semi-structured interviews which were transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively using established methods for thematic analysis. Results: Ten women (median age of 38.5 years, age range 28–57) participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews. Three main themes were identified: (1) feeling adrift in the health system, (2) feeling “On hold,” uncertain, and in need of guidance, and (3) feeling reliant on a system that does not understand. Within these themes, women with CPP describe tangible strategies and recommendations for improving health system navigation and care. Conclusion: Our study highlights the need for improved access to interprofessional CPP programs, enhanced and targeted training for health professionals in CPP management, and better health system navigation support. Specific recommendations were provided from the perspectives of women with CPP and included providing information on what to expect and prepare for their appointment and engaging patients in education resources while they wait.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨折系统,骨折护理:加拿大慢性骨盆疼痛妇女等待跨专业疼痛护理的经验
背景:慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)是一种常见的女性疾病,包括生物、心理和社会因素之间的复杂相互作用。获得跨专业、生物-心理-社会CPP护理对许多患者来说仍然是一个挑战。对妇女使用卫生服务进行CPP护理的经历以及等待跨专业CPP护理的影响缺乏了解。本研究探讨了加拿大CPP妇女在等待跨专业CPP护理时与卫生系统互动的看法和经历。方法:我们的定性研究包括加拿大安大略省等待跨专业护理的CPP患者。数据是通过半结构化访谈获得的,这些访谈逐字逐句转录,并使用既定的主题分析方法进行归纳分析。结果:10名女性(中位年龄38.5岁) 年龄28-57岁)参加了深入的半结构化访谈。确定了三个主要主题:(1)在卫生系统中感到漂泊不定,(2)感到“被搁置”,不确定,需要指导,以及(3)感到依赖于一个不理解的系统。在这些主题中,患有CPP的妇女描述了改善卫生系统导航和护理的具体战略和建议。结论:我们的研究强调,需要改善跨专业CPP项目的使用,加强对卫生专业人员的CPP管理培训,并提供更好的卫生系统导航支持。从患有CPP的女性的角度提供了具体的建议,包括提供关于预约预期和准备的信息,以及让患者在等待期间参与教育资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Endometriosis on TikTok: Evaluating social media misinformation and the role of healthcare professionals When cystoscopy catches what laparoscopy misses: The role of cystoscopy in evaluation of bladder endometriosis Comprehensive management of umbilical endometriosis using a unique laparoscopic entry portal (Darwish point) and postoperative Dienogest Chronic pelvic pain: An underrecognised perioperative consideration The Holy Grail of endometriosis biomarkers in the diagnostic process – How much would it be worth and what does it look like?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1