Reclamation of a resource extraction site: A differential game approach

IF 1 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Metroeconomica Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1111/meca.12381
Simone Marsiglio, Nahid Masoudi
{"title":"Reclamation of a resource extraction site: A differential game approach","authors":"Simone Marsiglio,&nbsp;Nahid Masoudi","doi":"10.1111/meca.12381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We study an extraction site reclamation problem in a two-player differential game setting over a finite time horizon. Environmental regulation requires each firm to engage in reclamation efforts during the entire lifespan of the extraction site and to pay an abandonment reclamation fee at the end of its lease term for the unclaimed pollution caused by firms’ activities. Firms determine their reclamation efforts in order to minimize their reclamation cost. We analyze and compare individual firms’ choices and the pollution stock in the noncooperative and the cooperative cases by distinguishing between situations in which firms are homogeneous and heterogeneous. We study the case in which firms have different lease durations and different degrees of environmental liability. We show that the dynamics of the reclamation efforts may be substantially different under noncooperation and cooperation, and in both cases, it is mainly determined by how the rate of time preference and the growth rate of firms’ liabilities compare. Moreover, in all scenarios, the reclamation efforts generally rise with the degree of liability and fall with the lease duration, suggesting that in order to promote better environmental outcomes, the regulators should carefully determine the lease conditions by introducing intra-term reclamation fees along with stringent environmental accountability.</p>","PeriodicalId":46885,"journal":{"name":"Metroeconomica","volume":"73 3","pages":"770-802"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/meca.12381","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metroeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/meca.12381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study an extraction site reclamation problem in a two-player differential game setting over a finite time horizon. Environmental regulation requires each firm to engage in reclamation efforts during the entire lifespan of the extraction site and to pay an abandonment reclamation fee at the end of its lease term for the unclaimed pollution caused by firms’ activities. Firms determine their reclamation efforts in order to minimize their reclamation cost. We analyze and compare individual firms’ choices and the pollution stock in the noncooperative and the cooperative cases by distinguishing between situations in which firms are homogeneous and heterogeneous. We study the case in which firms have different lease durations and different degrees of environmental liability. We show that the dynamics of the reclamation efforts may be substantially different under noncooperation and cooperation, and in both cases, it is mainly determined by how the rate of time preference and the growth rate of firms’ liabilities compare. Moreover, in all scenarios, the reclamation efforts generally rise with the degree of liability and fall with the lease duration, suggesting that in order to promote better environmental outcomes, the regulators should carefully determine the lease conditions by introducing intra-term reclamation fees along with stringent environmental accountability.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资源提取地点的回收:一种不同的游戏方法
我们研究了一个有限时间范围内的二人微分博弈环境下的提取场地回收问题。环境法规要求每个公司在开采场地的整个生命周期内进行回收工作,并在其租期结束时为公司活动造成的无人认领的污染支付废弃回收费。企业决定其回收努力,以尽量减少其回收成本。我们通过区分企业同质和异质性的情况,分析和比较了非合作和合作情况下单个企业的选择和污染存量。我们研究了企业具有不同租期和不同程度的环境责任的案例。我们发现,在非合作和合作情况下,复垦努力的动态可能存在本质差异,并且在这两种情况下,复垦努力的动态主要取决于时间偏好率和企业负债增长率的比较。此外,在所有情况下,填海努力一般随责任程度而上升,随租期而下降,这表明为了促进更好的环境结果,监管机构应通过引入期限内的填海费用和严格的环境问责制来仔细确定租赁条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Metroeconomica
Metroeconomica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Partially funded social security and growth Testing the theory of the firm under price and background risk Monetary policy, income distribution and semi‐autonomous demand in the US Using input‐output data to model the structure of export linkages in global value chains: A Brazil case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1