Why Does Social Work? A Proposal for a Social Work Understanding of Causality

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK British Journal of Social Work Pub Date : 2021-06-15 DOI:10.1093/BJSW/BCAB133
Bernd Dollinger
{"title":"Why Does Social Work? A Proposal for a Social Work Understanding of Causality","authors":"Bernd Dollinger","doi":"10.1093/BJSW/BCAB133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In a critical examination of evidence-based approaches, the contribution argues for the development of a concept of causality that is sustainable for social work in order to explain why it has an impact. Two special features of social work are important in this respect: it is confronted with relatively high complexity and service users shape the effects of social work in their interactions with professionals. A social work conceptualisation of causality should consider both aspects, and it should be analytically grounded in interactions between professionals and service users. However, their interrelated practices do not stand alone. Interactions are always reflexively accompanied by the participants. The awareness and expectation that social work measures (should) have consequences is part of the practice of social work and its effects.","PeriodicalId":48259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/BJSW/BCAB133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In a critical examination of evidence-based approaches, the contribution argues for the development of a concept of causality that is sustainable for social work in order to explain why it has an impact. Two special features of social work are important in this respect: it is confronted with relatively high complexity and service users shape the effects of social work in their interactions with professionals. A social work conceptualisation of causality should consider both aspects, and it should be analytically grounded in interactions between professionals and service users. However, their interrelated practices do not stand alone. Interactions are always reflexively accompanied by the participants. The awareness and expectation that social work measures (should) have consequences is part of the practice of social work and its effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么社会工作?关于社会工作理解因果关系的建议
在对循证方法的批判性审查中,该贡献主张发展一种对社会工作可持续的因果关系概念,以解释为什么它会产生影响。社会工作的两个特点在这方面很重要:它面临着相对较高的复杂性,服务用户在与专业人员的互动中塑造了社会工作的效果。社会工作因果关系的概念化应该考虑这两个方面,并且应该以专业人员和服务用户之间的互动为分析基础。然而,它们相互关联的做法并不是孤立的。互动总是伴随着参与者的反射。对社会工作措施(应该)产生后果的认识和期望是社会工作及其效果实践的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
22.20%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Published for the British Association of Social Workers, this is the leading academic social work journal in the UK. It covers every aspect of social work, with papers reporting research, discussing practice, and examining principles and theories. It is read by social work educators, researchers, practitioners and managers who wish to keep up to date with theoretical and empirical developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Walking aid training as a clinical competence in Canadian entry-to-practice professional academic programs. Re-Envisioning Field Education in Australian Social Work to Combat Placement Poverty: Students’, Educators’ and Practitioners’ Perceptions Can Social Workers Estimate the Likelihood of Future Actions and Events? A Forecasting Accuracy Study Role of Peer Support in Building Motivation to Change Addictive Behaviour An A–Z of Social Work Theory (1st Editions), Malcom Payne
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1