Pseudo air–bone gap in sensorineural hearing loss: Effect of signal frequency and degree of hearing loss – implications for clinical diagnosis

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Indian Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_14_23
Srikar Vijayasarathy, H. Shetty
{"title":"Pseudo air–bone gap in sensorineural hearing loss: Effect of signal frequency and degree of hearing loss – implications for clinical diagnosis","authors":"Srikar Vijayasarathy, H. Shetty","doi":"10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_14_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pseudo air–bone gaps (ABGs) in the audiogram can lead to a false diagnosis of middle ear pathology where none exists. While it is known that the magnitude of such false ABGs are frequency dependent, the effect on the severity of hearing loss on this relationship needs more clarity. Objective: The purpose of the study was to identify frequencies that are susceptible to pseudo-ABGs and investigate the effect of the degree of hearing loss on the magnitude of such air–bone gaps. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the ABG in three degrees of sensorineural hearing loss: mild (26–40 dB HL), moderate (41–55 dB HL), and moderately severe (56-70 dB HL) was carried out. One hundred and fifty samples were considered in each category (18–60 years). Differences across frequencies and degree of hearing loss were assessed. Results: Large ABGs were observed at 250 Hz and 4000 Hz, and the ABGs significantly increased with the degree of hearing loss at 250 Hz and 500 Hz. Conclusions: Caution needs to be exercised while interpreting the ABG at the low frequencies and 4000 Hz, especially when the degree of hearing loss is moderate and higher, to avoid the misdiagnosis of a conductive component in a sensorineural pathology.","PeriodicalId":44304,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otology","volume":"29 1","pages":"57 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_14_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pseudo air–bone gaps (ABGs) in the audiogram can lead to a false diagnosis of middle ear pathology where none exists. While it is known that the magnitude of such false ABGs are frequency dependent, the effect on the severity of hearing loss on this relationship needs more clarity. Objective: The purpose of the study was to identify frequencies that are susceptible to pseudo-ABGs and investigate the effect of the degree of hearing loss on the magnitude of such air–bone gaps. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the ABG in three degrees of sensorineural hearing loss: mild (26–40 dB HL), moderate (41–55 dB HL), and moderately severe (56-70 dB HL) was carried out. One hundred and fifty samples were considered in each category (18–60 years). Differences across frequencies and degree of hearing loss were assessed. Results: Large ABGs were observed at 250 Hz and 4000 Hz, and the ABGs significantly increased with the degree of hearing loss at 250 Hz and 500 Hz. Conclusions: Caution needs to be exercised while interpreting the ABG at the low frequencies and 4000 Hz, especially when the degree of hearing loss is moderate and higher, to avoid the misdiagnosis of a conductive component in a sensorineural pathology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感音神经性听力损失的假气骨间隙:信号频率和听力损失程度的影响-对临床诊断的意义
导读:听图中的假气骨间隙(ABGs)可能导致中耳病理的错误诊断。虽然已知这种假ABGs的大小与频率有关,但这种关系对听力损失严重程度的影响需要更明确。目的:本研究的目的是确定易受伪abgs影响的频率,并探讨听力损失程度对这种气骨间隙大小的影响。材料与方法:回顾性分析轻度(26-40 dB HL)、中度(41-55 dB HL)和中重度(56-70 dB HL)三种感觉神经性听力损失患者的ABG。每个类别中有150个样本(18-60岁)。评估了不同频率和听力损失程度的差异。结果:250hz和4000hz时abg较大,250hz和500hz时abg随听力损失程度显著增加。结论:在解释低频和4000 Hz的ABG时需要谨慎,特别是当听力损失程度为中度和更高时,以避免在感觉神经病理中误诊传导成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Otology
Indian Journal of Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Comparative study between anterior tucking and tunneling of graft in Type-1 tympanoplasty A comparative study of endoscopic versus microscopic tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media Application of finite element model of middle ear in the study of the middle ear biomechanics in normal and diseased states Transmastoid titanium mesh assisted extra dural layered closure of tegmen defect: Case report in a 10 year old Acoustic trauma in soldiers: Pure-tone audiometry versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a tool for early detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1