Study on diagnostic performance of fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography for congenital heart defect

Chao Huang, Bowen Zhao, H. Pang, Ran Chen, M. Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Bei Wang
{"title":"Study on diagnostic performance of fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography for congenital heart defect","authors":"Chao Huang, Bowen Zhao, H. Pang, Ran Chen, M. Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Bei Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN131148-20190628-00389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the sensitivity and specificity of fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography(FINE, 5D Heart) in the prenatal detection of congenital heart defect(CHD), and to compare its diagnostic performance with spatiotemporal image correlation(STIC) loop (STICloop). \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 250 pregnant women having a singleton pregnancy in the second and third trimesters from April 2018 to May 2019 in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University College of Medicine were enrolled in this prospective study. 2D ultrasound diagnosis has been made before acquiring STIC volume data set. After the appropriateness of each volume data set was preliminarily determined, all identifying informations were concealed and the appropriate volumes were randomly distributed to less experienced sonographer for analysis using 5D Heart software. The sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the two methods were determined respectively, and the differences between the two methods were statistically analyzed. \n \n \nResults \nThe diagnostic performance of 5D Heart for the prenatal detection of CHD was: sensitivity of 95.45% (105/110), specificity of 94.29% (132/140), positive likelihood ratio of 16.72, negative likelihood ratio of 0.05, and AUC of 0.95, respectively. Among cases with confirmed CHD, the 5D Heart diagnosis completely matched the final diagnosis in 77.27% (85/110). The diagnostic performance of STICloop for the prenatal detection of CHD was: sensitivity of 90.91% (100/110), specificity of 92.86% (130/140), positive likelihood ratio of 12.73, negative likelihood ratio of 0.10, and AUC of 0.92. The sensitivity and secificity of 5D Heart in diagnosing CHD were both higher than 90%, and it could successfully detect a broad spectrum of severe fetal CHD. Among cases with confirmed CHD, even the STICloop diagnosis completely matched the final diagnosis in 61.81%(68/110), its diagnostic accuracy was relatively lower than 5D Heart (P=0.013). However, there were no statistical differences between the two methods in sensitivity and specificity(all P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe sesitivity and specifity of 5D Heart in diagnosis CHD were both higher than 90%, and it could successfully detect a broad spectrum of severe fetal CHD. STICloop could be used for preliminary screening of CHD, as it has the same high sensitivity and specificity as 5D Heart. Further examination may be recommended when fetal heart abnormalities are suspected. \n \n \nKey words: \nEchocardiography; Congenital heart defect; Fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography; Spatiotemporal image correlation","PeriodicalId":10224,"journal":{"name":"中华超声影像学杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华超声影像学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN131148-20190628-00389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the sensitivity and specificity of fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography(FINE, 5D Heart) in the prenatal detection of congenital heart defect(CHD), and to compare its diagnostic performance with spatiotemporal image correlation(STIC) loop (STICloop). Methods A total of 250 pregnant women having a singleton pregnancy in the second and third trimesters from April 2018 to May 2019 in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University College of Medicine were enrolled in this prospective study. 2D ultrasound diagnosis has been made before acquiring STIC volume data set. After the appropriateness of each volume data set was preliminarily determined, all identifying informations were concealed and the appropriate volumes were randomly distributed to less experienced sonographer for analysis using 5D Heart software. The sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the two methods were determined respectively, and the differences between the two methods were statistically analyzed. Results The diagnostic performance of 5D Heart for the prenatal detection of CHD was: sensitivity of 95.45% (105/110), specificity of 94.29% (132/140), positive likelihood ratio of 16.72, negative likelihood ratio of 0.05, and AUC of 0.95, respectively. Among cases with confirmed CHD, the 5D Heart diagnosis completely matched the final diagnosis in 77.27% (85/110). The diagnostic performance of STICloop for the prenatal detection of CHD was: sensitivity of 90.91% (100/110), specificity of 92.86% (130/140), positive likelihood ratio of 12.73, negative likelihood ratio of 0.10, and AUC of 0.92. The sensitivity and secificity of 5D Heart in diagnosing CHD were both higher than 90%, and it could successfully detect a broad spectrum of severe fetal CHD. Among cases with confirmed CHD, even the STICloop diagnosis completely matched the final diagnosis in 61.81%(68/110), its diagnostic accuracy was relatively lower than 5D Heart (P=0.013). However, there were no statistical differences between the two methods in sensitivity and specificity(all P>0.05). Conclusions The sesitivity and specifity of 5D Heart in diagnosis CHD were both higher than 90%, and it could successfully detect a broad spectrum of severe fetal CHD. STICloop could be used for preliminary screening of CHD, as it has the same high sensitivity and specificity as 5D Heart. Further examination may be recommended when fetal heart abnormalities are suspected. Key words: Echocardiography; Congenital heart defect; Fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography; Spatiotemporal image correlation
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胎儿智能导航超声心动图对先天性心脏缺陷的诊断价值研究
目的探讨胎儿智能导航超声心动图(FINE,5D Heart)在先天性心脏病(CHD)产前检测中的敏感性和特异性,并与时空图像相关(STICloop)环路(STIClop)的诊断性能进行比较。方法对浙江大学医学院邵逸夫医院2018年4月至2019年5月期间单胎妊娠的250例中、晚期孕妇进行前瞻性研究。在获取STIC体积数据集之前,已经进行了2D超声诊断。在初步确定每个体积数据集的适当性后,隐藏所有识别信息,并将适当的体积随机分配给经验不足的声谱学家,使用5D Heart软件进行分析。分别测定两种方法的灵敏度和特异性、阳性和阴性似然比以及受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC),并对两种方法之间的差异进行统计分析。结果5D心脏对CHD产前检测的诊断性能为:敏感性95.45%(105/110),特异性94.29%(132/140),阳性似然比16.72,阴性似然比0.05,AUC 0.95。在确诊的CHD病例中,5D心脏诊断与最终诊断完全匹配的比例为77.27%(85/110)。STICloop对CHD产前检测的诊断性能为:敏感性为90.91%(100/110),特异性为92.86%(130/140),阳性似然比为12.73,阴性似然比为0.10,AUC为0.92。5D心脏对CHD的诊断灵敏度和安全性均高于90%,可成功检测出广泛的胎儿重度CHD。在确诊的CHD患者中,即使STICloop诊断与最终诊断完全匹配率为61.81%(68/110),其诊断准确率也相对低于5D心脏(P=0.013),两种方法的敏感性和特异性无统计学差异(均P>0.05)。STICloop具有与5D心脏相同的高灵敏度和特异性,可用于CHD的初步筛查。当怀疑胎儿心脏异常时,可能建议进行进一步检查。关键词:超声心动图;先天性心脏缺陷;胎儿智能导航超声心动图;时空图像相关性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华超声影像学杂志
中华超声影像学杂志 Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9126
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided pathological sampling of cadaver lung tissue in cases of COVID-19 Ultrasound-guided post-mortem tissue sampling in the autopsy of COVID-19 cases: a pilot study The clinical value of ultrasound in the assessment of the severity of COVID-19 Study of positioning of fetal conus medullaris by detecting atlanto-axial intervertebral space with three-dimensional ultrasound Prenatal ultrasound diagnostic clues of congenital dislocation of the knee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1