Women and self-defence: an empirical and doctrinal analysis

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW International Journal of Law in Context Pub Date : 2022-04-22 DOI:10.1017/S1744552322000131
Rachel McPherson
{"title":"Women and self-defence: an empirical and doctrinal analysis","authors":"Rachel McPherson","doi":"10.1017/S1744552322000131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The problem of women's access to self-defence has been internationally recognised. This paper presents original empirical data on women's use of self-defence in practice alongside critical feminist analysis of the requirements of self-defence under Scots law. The empirical findings confirm that women are rarely successful with self-defence at trial level and the doctrinal analysis further demonstrates that self-defence does not adequately reflect women's experience of violence, especially sexual violence, and instead continues to reflect male experiences of (public) violence. It is intended that this research will form part of a larger developing evidence base, the type of which has been called for (Fitz-Gibbon and Vannier, 2017) and can be used to support reform in this area. As such, it represents a significant contribution to socio-legal work that has considered the issue of women's access to criminal defences.","PeriodicalId":45455,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in Context","volume":"18 1","pages":"461 - 475"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law in Context","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552322000131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The problem of women's access to self-defence has been internationally recognised. This paper presents original empirical data on women's use of self-defence in practice alongside critical feminist analysis of the requirements of self-defence under Scots law. The empirical findings confirm that women are rarely successful with self-defence at trial level and the doctrinal analysis further demonstrates that self-defence does not adequately reflect women's experience of violence, especially sexual violence, and instead continues to reflect male experiences of (public) violence. It is intended that this research will form part of a larger developing evidence base, the type of which has been called for (Fitz-Gibbon and Vannier, 2017) and can be used to support reform in this area. As such, it represents a significant contribution to socio-legal work that has considered the issue of women's access to criminal defences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女与自卫:实证和理论分析
摘要妇女获得自卫权的问题已得到国际承认。本文提供了关于女性在实践中使用自卫的原始经验数据,以及对苏格兰法律下自卫要求的批判性女权主义分析。实证研究结果证实,妇女很少在审判阶段成功地进行自卫,理论分析进一步表明,自卫并没有充分反映妇女的暴力经历,特别是性暴力,而是继续反映男性的(公共)暴力经历。这项研究将成为一个更大的发展中的证据库的一部分,这种证据库已经被要求(Fitz-Gibbon和Vannier,2017),并可用于支持这一领域的改革。因此,它对考虑妇女获得刑事辩护问题的社会法律工作作出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Socio-legal instabilities in Ukraine’s wartime Compensation Law for damaged and destroyed residential property Fault Lines in the Rule of Law: Europe’s Present and the Presence of its Past The Role of Judicial Associations in Resisting Rule of Law Backsliding: Hidden Pathways of Protecting Judicial Independence Amidst Rule of Law Decay Hidden rule of law discontinuities: A theoretical framework for studying rule of law backsliding Backsliding Democracy and the Slippery Slope of Conceptual Weakness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1