Assessment of Disaster Preparedness Level of Medical Students of a University, Turkey

M. Tozun, Irem Zengi, Bilal Can Kart, Ezgi Ugur, Melike Cumen, Safak Kalender, Mert Dikmeoglu, Simge Seker, Omer Aydin
{"title":"Assessment of Disaster Preparedness Level of Medical Students of a University, Turkey","authors":"M. Tozun, Irem Zengi, Bilal Can Kart, Ezgi Ugur, Melike Cumen, Safak Kalender, Mert Dikmeoglu, Simge Seker, Omer Aydin","doi":"10.21601/ejeph/11834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In disaster-prone countries, preparedness is a very important factor in reducing the damages of disaster. The aim of this study is to determine the disaster preparedness knowledge level of a university ’ s medical students and to evaluate the relationships between possible related factors and disaster preparedness knowledge. Material and Method: This study is a cross-sectional study. The subject of research is measuring the level of disaster preparedness knowledge. The working period in which the online survey is applied is December 1-December 31, 2020. It was aimed to participate that attend the first and second grades of the medical faculty studying in the main campus of a University in Turkey. In order to compare the knowledge level of disaster preparedness among medical students, it was planned to include other faculty students as a control group. In the study, 75 medical students and 20 students from other faculties participated. A high score indicates good disaster preparedness. Chi-square, Mann Whitney U, and Kruskal Wallis were used in the statistical analyses. Results: The median value for disaster preparedness level score for all participants was 51.0 (min: 23.0; max: 63.0). Disaster preparedness knowledge level median score (54.0 [29.0-63.0]) was higher in women than men (48.5 [23.0-62.0]) (p<0.05). The median score of disaster preparedness knowledge level (53.0 [23.0-63.0]) of the second and upper grade was higher than the median score (49.0 [29.0-62.0]) of the first-year students (p<0.05). The median score of disaster preparedness knowledge level (55.0 [34.0-62.0]) was higher than the others (49.0 [23.0-63.0]) in those living in the city where their family resides (p<0.05). Conclusion: It can be said that the level of disaster preparedness for all participants is good. It is recommended to conduct a similar study in a larger study group.","PeriodicalId":72973,"journal":{"name":"European journal of environment and public health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of environment and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/11834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In disaster-prone countries, preparedness is a very important factor in reducing the damages of disaster. The aim of this study is to determine the disaster preparedness knowledge level of a university ’ s medical students and to evaluate the relationships between possible related factors and disaster preparedness knowledge. Material and Method: This study is a cross-sectional study. The subject of research is measuring the level of disaster preparedness knowledge. The working period in which the online survey is applied is December 1-December 31, 2020. It was aimed to participate that attend the first and second grades of the medical faculty studying in the main campus of a University in Turkey. In order to compare the knowledge level of disaster preparedness among medical students, it was planned to include other faculty students as a control group. In the study, 75 medical students and 20 students from other faculties participated. A high score indicates good disaster preparedness. Chi-square, Mann Whitney U, and Kruskal Wallis were used in the statistical analyses. Results: The median value for disaster preparedness level score for all participants was 51.0 (min: 23.0; max: 63.0). Disaster preparedness knowledge level median score (54.0 [29.0-63.0]) was higher in women than men (48.5 [23.0-62.0]) (p<0.05). The median score of disaster preparedness knowledge level (53.0 [23.0-63.0]) of the second and upper grade was higher than the median score (49.0 [29.0-62.0]) of the first-year students (p<0.05). The median score of disaster preparedness knowledge level (55.0 [34.0-62.0]) was higher than the others (49.0 [23.0-63.0]) in those living in the city where their family resides (p<0.05). Conclusion: It can be said that the level of disaster preparedness for all participants is good. It is recommended to conduct a similar study in a larger study group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其某大学医学生备灾水平评估
导言:在灾害频发的国家,备灾是减少灾害损失的一个非常重要的因素。摘要本研究旨在了解某高校医学生的备灾知识水平,并评估可能的相关因素与备灾知识的关系。材料与方法:本研究为横断面研究。研究的主题是衡量防灾知识的水平。网络调查申请的工作期限为2020年12月1日至12月31日。其目的是参加在土耳其一所大学主校区学习的医学院一年级和二年级的学生。为了比较医学生的防灾知识水平,计划将其他院系学生作为对照组。在这项研究中,75名医学院学生和20名其他院系的学生参与了研究。得分高说明备灾能力强。统计分析采用卡方、Mann Whitney U和Kruskal Wallis。结果:所有参与者的备灾水平得分中位数为51.0(最小值为23.0;马克斯:63.0)。女性备灾知识水平中位数得分(54.0[29.0 ~ 63.0])高于男性(48.5 [23.0 ~ 62.0])(p<0.05)。二年级及以上学生备灾知识水平中位数(53.0[23.0 ~ 63.0])高于一年级学生备灾知识水平中位数(49.0 [29.0 ~ 62.0])(p<0.05)。家庭所在城市家庭的备灾知识水平中位数(55.0[34.0 ~ 62.0])高于其他城市家庭的备灾知识水平中位数(49.0 [23.0 ~ 63.0])(p<0.05)。结论:可以说,各参与者的备灾水平较好。建议在更大的研究小组中进行类似的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of ACE2 cause of death between COVID-19 and various complications Defluoridation of drinking water by using low cost point of use treatment technologies: A review Exploring medical students’ perspectives on online education in medical education Understanding depression and suicide rates in the UK in comparison to Pakistan Life-event-induced changes in daily routines: Their association with the manifestation of dysphoric emotions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1