Divestment Movements over Environmental Issues: The Brazilian Amazon Case

Pedro Eymael
{"title":"Divestment Movements over Environmental Issues: The Brazilian Amazon Case","authors":"Pedro Eymael","doi":"10.33697/ajur.2023.076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Devastating forest fires in Brazil’s Amazon rainforest, one of the most important biomes for Earth’s climate balance, have captured the world’s attention in 2019 and 2020. Foreign governments, non-governmental organizations, and institutional investors pressured Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro to act and control the situation. Within this context, institutional investors threatened to divest from companies potentially linked to the wildfires and to sell government bonds, creating a divestment movement. Against this background, this article shows that Bolsonaro’s responses varied for each of the groups criticizing the handling of the environmental situation. It is argued that the Brazilian government adopted a more conciliatory tone and took more concrete actions when responding to institutional investors’ demands, compared to the responses for foreign governments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Based on fifteen in-depth interviews conducted in 2021 with professionals involved in this divestment case, the paper concludes that institutional investors played a key role in Bolsonaro’s winning coalition and electoral aspirations. Moreover, the shortage of financial capital due to the COVID-19 pandemic created further incentives for Bolsonaro to avoid conflicts with institutional investors. KEYWORDS: Divestment; Amazon Rainforest; Wildfires; Investors; Climate Change; Brazil; Politics","PeriodicalId":72177,"journal":{"name":"American journal of undergraduate research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of undergraduate research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33697/ajur.2023.076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Devastating forest fires in Brazil’s Amazon rainforest, one of the most important biomes for Earth’s climate balance, have captured the world’s attention in 2019 and 2020. Foreign governments, non-governmental organizations, and institutional investors pressured Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro to act and control the situation. Within this context, institutional investors threatened to divest from companies potentially linked to the wildfires and to sell government bonds, creating a divestment movement. Against this background, this article shows that Bolsonaro’s responses varied for each of the groups criticizing the handling of the environmental situation. It is argued that the Brazilian government adopted a more conciliatory tone and took more concrete actions when responding to institutional investors’ demands, compared to the responses for foreign governments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Based on fifteen in-depth interviews conducted in 2021 with professionals involved in this divestment case, the paper concludes that institutional investors played a key role in Bolsonaro’s winning coalition and electoral aspirations. Moreover, the shortage of financial capital due to the COVID-19 pandemic created further incentives for Bolsonaro to avoid conflicts with institutional investors. KEYWORDS: Divestment; Amazon Rainforest; Wildfires; Investors; Climate Change; Brazil; Politics
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境问题上的撤资运动:巴西亚马逊案例
作为地球气候平衡最重要的生物群落之一,巴西亚马逊雨林的毁灭性森林火灾在2019年和2020年引起了全世界的关注。外国政府、非政府组织和机构投资者向巴西总统雅伊尔·博尔索纳罗施压,要求他采取行动控制局势。在这种背景下,机构投资者威胁要从可能与野火有关的公司撤资,并出售政府债券,从而引发了一场撤资运动。在这种背景下,这篇文章表明,博尔索纳罗对每个批评环境状况处理的团体的反应各不相同。本文认为,与外国政府和非政府组织(ngo)的回应相比,巴西政府在回应机构投资者的要求时采取了更温和的语气,并采取了更具体的行动。根据2021年对参与该撤资案的专业人士进行的15次深度访谈,该论文得出结论,机构投资者在博尔索纳罗的获胜联盟和选举愿望中发挥了关键作用。此外,由于COVID-19大流行导致金融资本短缺,这进一步激励了博索纳罗避免与机构投资者发生冲突。关键词:撤资;亚马逊热带雨林;森林大火;投资者;气候变化;巴西;政治
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Faculty Opinions of AI Tools: Text Generators and Machine Translators On Sample Size Needed for Block Bootstrap Confidence Intervals to Have Desired Coverage Rates Fibroblast Embedded 3D Collagen as a Potential Tool for Epithelial Wound Repair Elongation Factor P is Required for Processes Associated with Acinetobacter Pathogenesis Measurement System for Compliance in Tubular Structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1