Prognosticators for quality of life in surgically treated head-and-neck cancer patients

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_57_20
N. Gupta, Shripal Jani, Priya Dubey, Zainab Fidvi, M. Kapre
{"title":"Prognosticators for quality of life in surgically treated head-and-neck cancer patients","authors":"N. Gupta, Shripal Jani, Priya Dubey, Zainab Fidvi, M. Kapre","doi":"10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_57_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Physiological, functional, and psychological implications of head-and-neck cancer treatment are significant. Improving outcomes in cancer care must include due diligence to quality of life (QOL) along with disease control. This study assesses QOL of head-and-neck cancer patients before and after treatment and explores predictive factors. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study of consecutive head-and-neck cancer patients. QOL assessments were made at baseline, and different stages of their treatment and prognostic factors such as age, gender, socioeconomic strata, comorbidities, tumor stage, requirement of reconstruction, adjuvant treatment, were examined. EORTC QOL questionnaire-H and N0 35 were employed, and prognostic factor correlation was studied by logistic regression analysis. Results: Ninety-eight patients at least 12 months post-treatment scored worst for dryness of the mouth (33.4), followed by sticky saliva (23.4). Although results steadily improved over time, this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.235). Stage of the primary tumor, requirement of reconstruction, and adjuvant treatment were statistically significant prognostic factors (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Understanding of QOL parameters would improve treatment planning, counseling of head-and-neck cancer patients and care-givers and enable physical, functional, and social rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":41774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jhnps.jhnps_57_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Physiological, functional, and psychological implications of head-and-neck cancer treatment are significant. Improving outcomes in cancer care must include due diligence to quality of life (QOL) along with disease control. This study assesses QOL of head-and-neck cancer patients before and after treatment and explores predictive factors. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study of consecutive head-and-neck cancer patients. QOL assessments were made at baseline, and different stages of their treatment and prognostic factors such as age, gender, socioeconomic strata, comorbidities, tumor stage, requirement of reconstruction, adjuvant treatment, were examined. EORTC QOL questionnaire-H and N0 35 were employed, and prognostic factor correlation was studied by logistic regression analysis. Results: Ninety-eight patients at least 12 months post-treatment scored worst for dryness of the mouth (33.4), followed by sticky saliva (23.4). Although results steadily improved over time, this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.235). Stage of the primary tumor, requirement of reconstruction, and adjuvant treatment were statistically significant prognostic factors (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Understanding of QOL parameters would improve treatment planning, counseling of head-and-neck cancer patients and care-givers and enable physical, functional, and social rehabilitation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术治疗头颈癌患者生活质量的预后因素
引言:头颈部癌症治疗的生理、功能和心理意义重大。改善癌症护理的结果必须包括对生活质量(QOL)的尽职调查以及疾病控制。本研究评估了癌症头颈部患者治疗前后的生活质量,并探讨了预测因素。材料与方法:对连续的癌症头颈部患者进行前瞻性观察研究。在基线时进行生活质量评估,并检查其治疗的不同阶段和预后因素,如年龄、性别、社会经济阶层、合并症、肿瘤分期、重建要求、辅助治疗。采用EORTC生活质量问卷-H和N0 35,并通过logistic回归分析研究预后因素相关性。结果:治疗后至少12个月的98名患者口腔干燥评分最差(33.4),其次是唾液粘稠(23.4)。尽管随着时间的推移,结果稳步改善,但这并没有达到统计学意义(P=0.235),结论:了解癌症患者和护理人员的生活质量参数有助于改善其治疗计划和咨询,促进其身体、功能和社会康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons
Journal of Head & Neck Physicians and Surgeons MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
High-grade sarcoma of the hyoid bone: An unusual case illustrating the challenges faced by the pathologist to arrive at a diagnosis Circulating tumor cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma – Current status of its usefulness in clinical practice Is awake videoscope-assisted bougie-guided intubation superior to fiberoptic intubation in patients with carcinoma larynx? Biochemical and molecular characteristics of Porphyromonas gingivalis a key causative pathogen in periodontitis Oral health status of individuals affected with chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1