Progressive Grand Strategy, Co-Relational Power and Geopolitical Dilemmas. NATO and the EU in A Competitive Multipolar System

IF 1.1 Q2 AREA STUDIES Journal of Contemporary European Research Pub Date : 2022-09-20 DOI:10.30950/jcer.v18i1.1210
Cornelia-Adriana Baciu, Dominika Kunertova
{"title":"Progressive Grand Strategy, Co-Relational Power and Geopolitical Dilemmas. NATO and the EU in A Competitive Multipolar System","authors":"Cornelia-Adriana Baciu, Dominika Kunertova","doi":"10.30950/jcer.v18i1.1210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on a Foucauldian philosophy of thought, this article proposes the concept of co-relational power, substantively understood as non-zero sum (positive) power – i. e. the power of one actor is not detrimental to the power of another actor, but it is instead a sum of cooperative interactions between actors. We argue that, in a context of competitive multipolarity, international collaborative security organisations, such as NATO and the EU, seek to adapt and to develop progressive and evolutionary grand strategies that can remain stable over time. Our analysis shows that both NATO and the EU are faced with geopolitical dilemmas while they seek to adapt to the new international order and constellation of threats. The main contribution of this article is that it produces new knowledge about the conceptual underpinnings and practical implications of a concept of non-zero sum (positive) concept of co-relational power, that can help understand how collaborative security organisations can become stabilising and re-enforcing pillars in the international rules-based order (‘building blocks of order’) without entering the spiral of great power competition but instead pursuing strategies that are progressive for a stable international development.  ","PeriodicalId":44985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v18i1.1210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing on a Foucauldian philosophy of thought, this article proposes the concept of co-relational power, substantively understood as non-zero sum (positive) power – i. e. the power of one actor is not detrimental to the power of another actor, but it is instead a sum of cooperative interactions between actors. We argue that, in a context of competitive multipolarity, international collaborative security organisations, such as NATO and the EU, seek to adapt and to develop progressive and evolutionary grand strategies that can remain stable over time. Our analysis shows that both NATO and the EU are faced with geopolitical dilemmas while they seek to adapt to the new international order and constellation of threats. The main contribution of this article is that it produces new knowledge about the conceptual underpinnings and practical implications of a concept of non-zero sum (positive) concept of co-relational power, that can help understand how collaborative security organisations can become stabilising and re-enforcing pillars in the international rules-based order (‘building blocks of order’) without entering the spiral of great power competition but instead pursuing strategies that are progressive for a stable international development.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进步大战略、共同关系权力与地缘政治困境。竞争多极体系中的北约与欧盟
借鉴福柯的思想哲学,本文提出了共同关系权力的概念,本质上被理解为非零和(积极)权力——即一个行动者的权力不会损害另一个行动者的权力,而是行动者之间合作互动的总和。我们认为,在竞争多极化的背景下,国际合作安全组织,如北约和欧盟,应寻求适应并制定能够长期保持稳定的进步和进化的大战略。我们的分析表明,北约和欧盟在寻求适应新的国际秩序和各种威胁的同时,都面临着地缘政治困境。本文的主要贡献在于,它产生了关于非零和(积极)共同关系权力概念的概念基础和实际含义的新知识,这有助于理解合作性安全组织如何能够在不进入大国竞争的漩涡的情况下,成为以规则为基础的国际秩序(“秩序的基石”)的稳定和加强支柱,而是追求有利于稳定国际发展的渐进战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decolonising EU Trade Relations with the Global Souths? Disrupting and Re-imagining European Studies: towards a More Diverse and Inclusive Discipline Moving from EU-centrisms: Lessons from the Polycrisis for EU studies and Global South Regionalism Rethinking African-European Scientific Cooperation: The Case of the Platform for African-European Studies Unlearning and Relearning Europe: Theoretical and Practical Approaches to Decolonising European Studies Curricula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1