Bound to Share or Not to Care. The Force of Fate, Gods, Luck, Chance and Choice across Cultures

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Cognition and Culture Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1163/15685373-12340172
Renatas Berniūnas, Audrius Beinorius, V. Dranseika, Vytis Silius, Paulius Rimkevičius
{"title":"Bound to Share or Not to Care. The Force of Fate, Gods, Luck, Chance and Choice across Cultures","authors":"Renatas Berniūnas, Audrius Beinorius, V. Dranseika, Vytis Silius, Paulius Rimkevičius","doi":"10.1163/15685373-12340172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPeople across cultures consider everyday choices in the context of perceived various external life-determining forces: such as fate and gods (two teleological forces) and such notions as luck and chance (two non-teleological forces). There is little cross-cultural evidence (except for a belief in gods) showing how people relate these salient notions of life-determining forces to prosociality and a sense of well-being. The current paper provides preliminary cross-cultural data to address this gap. Results indicate that choice is the most important life-determining factor. Regression analyses indicate that choice and belief in gods and fate emerged as significant predictors of prosociality towards strangers. Moreover, luck was a significant predictor of decreased prosociality. A relation between life-determining forces and life satisfaction followed the same pattern: choice, gods, and fate emerged as significant predictors of greater life satisfaction, whereas luck was associated with decreased life satisfaction. The overall pattern of results indicates that participants across different cultures might sense being bounded to share or not to care depending on the perceived intentional agency and meaning in the external forces.","PeriodicalId":46186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People across cultures consider everyday choices in the context of perceived various external life-determining forces: such as fate and gods (two teleological forces) and such notions as luck and chance (two non-teleological forces). There is little cross-cultural evidence (except for a belief in gods) showing how people relate these salient notions of life-determining forces to prosociality and a sense of well-being. The current paper provides preliminary cross-cultural data to address this gap. Results indicate that choice is the most important life-determining factor. Regression analyses indicate that choice and belief in gods and fate emerged as significant predictors of prosociality towards strangers. Moreover, luck was a significant predictor of decreased prosociality. A relation between life-determining forces and life satisfaction followed the same pattern: choice, gods, and fate emerged as significant predictors of greater life satisfaction, whereas luck was associated with decreased life satisfaction. The overall pattern of results indicates that participants across different cultures might sense being bounded to share or not to care depending on the perceived intentional agency and meaning in the external forces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
必须分享或不在乎。命运、上帝、运气、机遇和文化选择的力量
不同文化的人们在感知到的各种外部生命决定力量的背景下考虑日常选择:如命运和神(两种目的论力量)以及运气和机会(两种非目的论力量)等概念。几乎没有跨文化的证据(除了对上帝的信仰)表明人们如何将这些决定生活的力量的显著概念与亲社会和幸福感联系起来。本文提供了初步的跨文化数据来解决这一差距。结果表明,选择是决定人生最重要的因素。回归分析表明,对神和命运的选择和信仰是对陌生人亲社会行为的重要预测因素。此外,运气是亲社会倾向下降的重要预测因素。决定生活的力量和生活满意度之间的关系也遵循同样的模式:选择、上帝和命运是生活满意度提高的重要预测因素,而运气则与生活满意度降低有关。结果的整体模式表明,不同文化的参与者可能会感觉到被限制分享或不关心,这取决于感知到的有意代理和外部力量的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Journal of Cognition and Culture PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cognition and Culture provides an interdisciplinary forum for exploring the mental foundations of culture and the cultural foundations of mental life. The primary focus of the journal is on explanations of cultural phenomena in terms of acquisition, representation and transmission involving cognitive capacities without excluding the study of cultural differences. The journal contains articles, commentaries, reports of experiments, and book reviews that emerge out of the inquiries by, and conversations between, scholars in experimental psychology, developmental psychology, social cognition, neuroscience, human evolution, cognitive science of religion, and cognitive anthropology.
期刊最新文献
Sentiments Organize Affect Concepts in Yasawa, Fiji: a Cultural Domain Analysis The Role of Spoken Language on Performance of Cognitive Tests: the Indonesian Experience Tribal Politics: Political Orientation Predicts Authoritarian Traits, Cross-Cultural Interactions, and Adherence to Common Identity Factors Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: Groupism and Cognition An Evolutionary Model of Early Theology When Moral and Religious Capacities Converge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1