Comparative Effectiveness of Preventive and Treatment Interventions for Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome Following Bypass Surgery

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyz310_501
G. Skandalakis, A. Kalyvas, Evgenia Lani, Spyridon Komaitis, Despoina Chatzopoulou, Danai Manolakou, N. Pantazis, G. Zenonos, C. Hadjipanayis, G. Stranjalis, C. Koutsarnakis
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Preventive and Treatment Interventions for Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome Following Bypass Surgery","authors":"G. Skandalakis, A. Kalyvas, Evgenia Lani, Spyridon Komaitis, Despoina Chatzopoulou, Danai Manolakou, N. Pantazis, G. Zenonos, C. Hadjipanayis, G. Stranjalis, C. Koutsarnakis","doi":"10.1093/neuros/nyz310_501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Although cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) remains a major complication of bypass surgery that can lead to severe neurological morbidity and mortality, data regarding its prevention and treatment have not been assorted until date. Thus, we systematically reviewed the literature, to assess available data and evaluate whether any conclusions can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of utilized interventions on either preventing or treating bypass related CHS.\n \n \n \n We systematically reviewed PubMed & Cochrane Library from September 2008 to September 2018 according to PRISMA, to collect data regarding the effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions on the prevention (PRE) and treatment (TRE) of bypass-related CHS. We categorized interventions regarding their class of drugs and their combinations and calculated overall pooled estimates of the proportions of CHS development or improvement through random-effects meta-analyses of proportions using a Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation.\n \n \n \n Our search yielded 646 studies of which 40 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of PRE included 23 studies/2041 cases. In group [A] (BP control) 202 out of 1174 pretreated cases developed CHS (23.3% pooled estimate; 95% CI 9.9-39.4), in group [B] (BP control + Free Radical Scavenger (FRS)) 10/263 pretreated cases developed CHS (0.3%; 95% CI 0.0-14.1), in group [C] (BP control + antiplatelet) 22/204 pretreated cases developed CHS (10.3%; 95% CI 5.1-16.7), and in group [D] (BP control + Postoperative sedation) 29/400 pretreated cases developed CHS (6.8%; 95% CI 4.4-9.6)]. Meta-analysis of TRE included 29 studies/144 cases that developed CHS. Pooled estimates of improvement ranged from 92.1% to 100.0%.\n \n \n \n Our data suggest that BP control alone as a pretreatment has not been proven effective in preventing CHS. However, BP control along with either postoperative sedation or an FRS or an antiplatelet agent seem to reduce the incidence of CHS. Once CHS has developed, BP control and/or FRS administration may ameliorate symptoms.\n","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/neuros/nyz310_501","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz310_501","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) remains a major complication of bypass surgery that can lead to severe neurological morbidity and mortality, data regarding its prevention and treatment have not been assorted until date. Thus, we systematically reviewed the literature, to assess available data and evaluate whether any conclusions can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of utilized interventions on either preventing or treating bypass related CHS. We systematically reviewed PubMed & Cochrane Library from September 2008 to September 2018 according to PRISMA, to collect data regarding the effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions on the prevention (PRE) and treatment (TRE) of bypass-related CHS. We categorized interventions regarding their class of drugs and their combinations and calculated overall pooled estimates of the proportions of CHS development or improvement through random-effects meta-analyses of proportions using a Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Our search yielded 646 studies of which 40 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of PRE included 23 studies/2041 cases. In group [A] (BP control) 202 out of 1174 pretreated cases developed CHS (23.3% pooled estimate; 95% CI 9.9-39.4), in group [B] (BP control + Free Radical Scavenger (FRS)) 10/263 pretreated cases developed CHS (0.3%; 95% CI 0.0-14.1), in group [C] (BP control + antiplatelet) 22/204 pretreated cases developed CHS (10.3%; 95% CI 5.1-16.7), and in group [D] (BP control + Postoperative sedation) 29/400 pretreated cases developed CHS (6.8%; 95% CI 4.4-9.6)]. Meta-analysis of TRE included 29 studies/144 cases that developed CHS. Pooled estimates of improvement ranged from 92.1% to 100.0%. Our data suggest that BP control alone as a pretreatment has not been proven effective in preventing CHS. However, BP control along with either postoperative sedation or an FRS or an antiplatelet agent seem to reduce the incidence of CHS. Once CHS has developed, BP control and/or FRS administration may ameliorate symptoms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旁路手术后脑高灌注综合征预防与治疗干预措施的比较效果
尽管脑过度灌注综合征(CHS)仍然是搭桥手术的主要并发症,可能导致严重的神经系统发病率和死亡率,但迄今为止,有关其预防和治疗的数据尚未分类。因此,我们系统地回顾了文献,以评估可用数据,并评估是否可以就所用干预措施对预防或治疗旁路相关CHS的有效性得出任何结论。根据PRISMA,我们从2008年9月至2018年9月系统地回顾了PubMed和Cochrane图书馆,以收集有关药物干预对旁路相关CHS预防(PRE)和治疗(TRE)的有效性的数据。我们根据药物类别及其组合对干预措施进行了分类,并通过使用Freeman-Tukey双正弦变换对比例进行随机效应荟萃分析,计算了CHS发展或改善比例的总体汇总估计。我们的搜索得到646项研究,其中40项符合纳入标准。PRE的荟萃分析包括23项研究/2041例。在[A]组(BP对照组)中,1174例预处理病例中有202例发生了CHS(23.3%汇总估计值;95%置信区间9.9-39.4),在[B]组(血压对照组+自由基清除剂(FRS))中,10/263例预处理患者发生CHS(0.3%;95%可信区间0.0-14.1),在[D]组(血压控制+术后镇静)中,29/400例预处理病例发生CHS(6.8%;95%CI 4.4-9.6)]。TRE的荟萃分析包括29项研究/144例发生CHS的病例。综合评估的改善率在92.1%至100.0%之间。我们的数据表明,单独作为预处理的BP控制尚未被证明对预防CHS有效。然而,血压控制以及术后镇静或FRS或抗血小板药物似乎可以降低CHS的发生率。一旦出现CHS,BP控制和/或FRS管理可能会改善症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
期刊最新文献
Defusing the Neurosurgery Arms Race: A Blueprint for Quality-Focused Residency Selection. Differential Risk Factors for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Between T8-T10 and T11-L1 Upper Instrumented Vertebrae in Adult Spinal Deformity. Using the Quality Outcomes Database to Identify Minimum Clinically Important Differences for Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Length of Transverse Sinus Reinforcement Predicts Symptom Improvement After Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Evaluating Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Implications for Outpatient Management: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1