Nitrogen use efficiency, yield and yield traits of wheat response to slow-releasing N fertilizer under balanced fertilization in Vertisols and Cambisols of Tigray, Ethiopia

Q2 Environmental Science Cogent Environmental Science Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23311843.2020.1778996
Sofonyas Dargie, Lemma Wogi, S. Kidanu
{"title":"Nitrogen use efficiency, yield and yield traits of wheat response to slow-releasing N fertilizer under balanced fertilization in Vertisols and Cambisols of Tigray, Ethiopia","authors":"Sofonyas Dargie, Lemma Wogi, S. Kidanu","doi":"10.1080/23311843.2020.1778996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study was initiated to investigate the effects of slow nitrogen-releasing fertilizer (UREAStabil) on yield, yield components and nitrogen use efficiency indices of bread wheat at Emba Alaje and Hawzien Districts in Tigray, Ethiopia in 2015 at six farmers’ field and arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Treatments were four levels of nitrogen (0, 32, 64 and 96) kg ha−1. The nitrogen source was UREAStabil, which is slow N-releasing fertilizer. Conventional urea at the recommended rate (64 kg N ha−1) was included as a positive control at both sites. A full dose of UREAStabil were applied at planting while prilled urea (conventional urea) was applied in two splits 1/3 at planting and 2/3 at tillering. Application of UREAStabil significantly influenced yield and yield components at both soil types. The highest grain yield was obtained on plots treated with 64 kg N ha−1 in the form of UREAStabil and prilled urea (conventional urea) in Hawzien and Emba Alaje districts, respectively. The highest nitrogen uptake was recorded on plots treated with 64 kg N ha−1in the form of UREAStabil and prilled urea (conventional urea) in Hawzien and Emba Alaje, respectively. Nitrogen uptake, agronomic, physiological and apparent recovery efficiency were significantly influenced by the application of slow-releasing and conventional nitrogen fertilizers at both sites. In Hawzien, the application of slow-releasing N fertilizer in the form of UREAStabil reduces the amount of N used and application time. Hence, it could be concluded application of slow-releasing fertilizer could be used as an alternative source of nitrogen for wheat production in the study site.","PeriodicalId":45615,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23311843.2020.1778996","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2020.1778996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract The study was initiated to investigate the effects of slow nitrogen-releasing fertilizer (UREAStabil) on yield, yield components and nitrogen use efficiency indices of bread wheat at Emba Alaje and Hawzien Districts in Tigray, Ethiopia in 2015 at six farmers’ field and arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Treatments were four levels of nitrogen (0, 32, 64 and 96) kg ha−1. The nitrogen source was UREAStabil, which is slow N-releasing fertilizer. Conventional urea at the recommended rate (64 kg N ha−1) was included as a positive control at both sites. A full dose of UREAStabil were applied at planting while prilled urea (conventional urea) was applied in two splits 1/3 at planting and 2/3 at tillering. Application of UREAStabil significantly influenced yield and yield components at both soil types. The highest grain yield was obtained on plots treated with 64 kg N ha−1 in the form of UREAStabil and prilled urea (conventional urea) in Hawzien and Emba Alaje districts, respectively. The highest nitrogen uptake was recorded on plots treated with 64 kg N ha−1in the form of UREAStabil and prilled urea (conventional urea) in Hawzien and Emba Alaje, respectively. Nitrogen uptake, agronomic, physiological and apparent recovery efficiency were significantly influenced by the application of slow-releasing and conventional nitrogen fertilizers at both sites. In Hawzien, the application of slow-releasing N fertilizer in the form of UREAStabil reduces the amount of N used and application time. Hence, it could be concluded application of slow-releasing fertilizer could be used as an alternative source of nitrogen for wheat production in the study site.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚提格雷黄土高原平衡施肥条件下小麦对缓释氮肥的氮素利用效率、产量和产量特性
摘要本研究于2015年在埃塞俄比亚提格雷的Emba Alaje和Hawzien地区的六个农民田间启动,以随机完全区组设计和三次重复的方式,研究了缓释氮肥(UREAStabil)对面包小麦产量、产量组成和氮利用效率指数的影响。处理为四个水平的氮(0、32、64和96)kg ha−1。氮源为UREAStabil,这是一种缓慢释放氮的肥料。在这两个地点,均将推荐速率的常规尿素(64 kg N ha−1)作为阳性对照。在种植时施用全剂量的UREAStabil,而造粒尿素(常规尿素)在种植时分为三分之一和分蘖时分为二分之一施用。UREAStabil的施用显著影响了两种土壤类型的产量和产量组成。在Hawzien和Emba-Alaje区,分别用64kg N ha−1的UREAStabil和造粒尿素(传统尿素)处理的地块获得了最高的粮食产量。在Hawzien和Emba-Alaje分别用64kg N ha−1的UREAStabil和造粒尿素(传统尿素)处理的地块上,氮吸收量最高。缓释氮肥和常规氮肥对两个地点的氮素吸收、农艺、生理和表观恢复效率都有显著影响。在Hawzien,施用UREAStabil形式的缓释氮肥可以减少氮的使用量和施用时间。因此,可以得出结论,施用缓释肥料可以作为研究地点小麦生产的替代氮源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cogent Environmental Science
Cogent Environmental Science ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of spirotetramat and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic pesticides on two phytoplankton species (Monoraphidium griffithii and Coscinodiscus sp.) in a single and compound mixture laboratory exposure Analysing the challenges in implementing Vietnam’s Nationally-Determined Contribution (NDC) in the agriculture sector under the current legal, regulatory and policy environment Assessing spatial patterns of forest degradation in dry Miombo woodland in Southern Tanzania Dioxins in peat and its formation: An overview South Korea’s big move to hydrogen society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1