A comparative review of the role of markets and institutions in sustaining innovation in cleantech: a critical mass approach

IF 0.6 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2017-04-04 DOI:10.1504/IJISD.2017.10003607
Kernaghan Webb, R. Cruz, P. Walsh
{"title":"A comparative review of the role of markets and institutions in sustaining innovation in cleantech: a critical mass approach","authors":"Kernaghan Webb, R. Cruz, P. Walsh","doi":"10.1504/IJISD.2017.10003607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper serves to examine and compare the role of markets and institutions in the adoption of clean technologies ('cleantech') in Canada, Germany and the USA. Sustainable innovation and industry growth in cleantech in a particular jurisdiction can take place when there is ongoing market pressure for cleantech and a 'critical mass' of private sector, government and academic actors, initiatives and structures that support the widespread adoption and use of cleantech. Employing Webb's (2005) sustainable governance approach as a base of analysis, it would appear that Canada lacks the density of institutions, instruments, processes and actors needed to create a critical mass to support sustainable cleantech activity in the long-term. In particular, when compared with Germany and the USA, the Canadian approach lacks key federal support and lacks the degree of private sector and civil society (academic) activity in cleantech that can be observed in those jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":45705,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development","volume":"11 1","pages":"149-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2017.10003607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper serves to examine and compare the role of markets and institutions in the adoption of clean technologies ('cleantech') in Canada, Germany and the USA. Sustainable innovation and industry growth in cleantech in a particular jurisdiction can take place when there is ongoing market pressure for cleantech and a 'critical mass' of private sector, government and academic actors, initiatives and structures that support the widespread adoption and use of cleantech. Employing Webb's (2005) sustainable governance approach as a base of analysis, it would appear that Canada lacks the density of institutions, instruments, processes and actors needed to create a critical mass to support sustainable cleantech activity in the long-term. In particular, when compared with Germany and the USA, the Canadian approach lacks key federal support and lacks the degree of private sector and civil society (academic) activity in cleantech that can be observed in those jurisdictions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市场和制度在维持清洁技术创新中的作用的比较回顾:临界质量方法
本文旨在研究和比较加拿大、德国和美国市场和机构在采用清洁技术(“清洁技术”)方面的作用。当清洁技术面临持续的市场压力,私营部门、政府和学术行为者的“临界群体”时,特定管辖区的清洁技术可以实现可持续创新和行业增长,支持广泛采用和使用清洁技术的倡议和结构。采用Webb(2005)的可持续治理方法作为分析的基础,加拿大似乎缺乏建立长期支持可持续清洁技术活动的关键群体所需的机构、工具、流程和行为者的密度。特别是,与德国和美国相比,加拿大的做法缺乏关键的联邦支持,也缺乏这些司法管辖区所能观察到的私营部门和民间社会(学术)在清洁技术方面的活动程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development
International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The IJISD focuses on broad aspects of innovation and sustainable development. It fosters discussion not only on technological innovation but on new ways of thinking about the complex and contested issues of sustainable development. Innovative thinking and practices in areas of economics, policy-making, legislation, health, education and the institutional barriers to sustainable development form the basis of the discourse to be fostered.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of the treatment of primary acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis. Green algae Caulerpa lentillifera cultivation technique utilising CO2 and its social impacts Is the new normal driving sustainability: evidence from Indian wedding industry Coping strategies of ready-made garments workers in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative assessment Changing patterns of household water consumption and conservation behaviour in Bangladesh: an exploration in the context of COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1