Conceptual Metaphors: an Insight into Teachers’ and Students’ EFL Learning Beliefs

Natalia Zambon Ferronato
{"title":"Conceptual Metaphors: an Insight into Teachers’ and Students’ EFL Learning Beliefs","authors":"Natalia Zambon Ferronato","doi":"10.18861/cied.2022.13.2.3176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers and students hold their own language learning beliefs about English as a Foreign Language (EFL). In the classroom, students’ and teachers’ beliefs interact, which might result in either tension or opportunities for change. Considering that it might be difficult to evoke some of the participants’ beliefs, this study opted to analyze conceptual metaphors as an indirect way to elicit them. Metaphors are part of our thoughts and actions and, sometimes, they are the only way of organizing and expressing our experiences coherently (Lakoff & Johnson, 2003). This study analyzed, through metaphor analysis, how students’ beliefs about learning EFL relate to the teacher’s selection and use of language learning strategies (LLS) in the classroom. The study occurred at an English Institute in Montevideo, Uruguay, between October and November 2018. The methodology of this multiple case study was qualitative. The participants were three EFL teachers and four groups of students ranging from basic to advanced level. Students were asked to respond to the following prompt with a metaphor: “For me, learning English as a foreign language is (like)… because…”. Then they wrote a letter advising a future EFL student. Teachers answered a structured interview in which they provided a metaphor describing the work with their groups. The most heterogeneous group in terms of age was selected for a follow-up structured interview. Results indicate that metaphors not only shed light upon how students perceive their learning process, but also encourage reflection. The study also found that several factors influence teachers’ selection of language learning strategies, including the role of international exams. We can conclude that visible interactions that happen in class are like the tip of an iceberg - beliefs lie hidden from view.","PeriodicalId":52635,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Investigacion Educativa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Investigacion Educativa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18861/cied.2022.13.2.3176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Teachers and students hold their own language learning beliefs about English as a Foreign Language (EFL). In the classroom, students’ and teachers’ beliefs interact, which might result in either tension or opportunities for change. Considering that it might be difficult to evoke some of the participants’ beliefs, this study opted to analyze conceptual metaphors as an indirect way to elicit them. Metaphors are part of our thoughts and actions and, sometimes, they are the only way of organizing and expressing our experiences coherently (Lakoff & Johnson, 2003). This study analyzed, through metaphor analysis, how students’ beliefs about learning EFL relate to the teacher’s selection and use of language learning strategies (LLS) in the classroom. The study occurred at an English Institute in Montevideo, Uruguay, between October and November 2018. The methodology of this multiple case study was qualitative. The participants were three EFL teachers and four groups of students ranging from basic to advanced level. Students were asked to respond to the following prompt with a metaphor: “For me, learning English as a foreign language is (like)… because…”. Then they wrote a letter advising a future EFL student. Teachers answered a structured interview in which they provided a metaphor describing the work with their groups. The most heterogeneous group in terms of age was selected for a follow-up structured interview. Results indicate that metaphors not only shed light upon how students perceive their learning process, but also encourage reflection. The study also found that several factors influence teachers’ selection of language learning strategies, including the role of international exams. We can conclude that visible interactions that happen in class are like the tip of an iceberg - beliefs lie hidden from view.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念隐喻:对教师和学生英语学习信念的洞察
教师和学生对英语作为外语有自己的语言学习信念。在课堂上,学生和教师的信念相互作用,这可能导致紧张或改变的机会。考虑到唤起一些参与者的信念可能是困难的,本研究选择分析概念隐喻作为间接引出它们的方式。隐喻是我们思想和行为的一部分,有时,它们是连贯地组织和表达我们经验的唯一方式(Lakoff & Johnson, 2003)。本研究通过隐喻分析,分析了学生的外语学习信念与教师在课堂上选择和使用语言学习策略之间的关系。该研究于2018年10月至11月在乌拉圭蒙得维的亚的一家英语学院进行。这个多案例研究的方法是定性的。参与者是三名英语教师和四组从初级到高级的学生。学生们被要求用一个比喻来回答下面的提示:“对我来说,学习英语作为一门外语就像……因为……”。然后他们给一位未来的英语学生写了一封信。教师们回答了一个结构化的采访,在这个采访中,他们提供了一个比喻来描述他们与小组的工作。选择年龄差异最大的一组进行后续结构化访谈。结果表明,隐喻不仅揭示了学生如何感知他们的学习过程,而且还鼓励反思。该研究还发现,影响教师选择语言学习策略的几个因素,包括国际考试的作用。我们可以得出结论,课堂上可见的互动就像冰山一角——信念隐藏在视野之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Competencias emocionales en estudiantes de educación superior de Argentina, Chile y Colombia Redes de aprendizaje profesional docente en contextos escolares chilenos Beliefs and Practices of Academic Reading and Writing in Researchers in Training ¿Nativos digitales? Percepción de habilidades en niños y niñas de zonas rurales Producción narrativa en el contexto del aislamiento social por COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1