Reliability of Online Information on Self-Examination and Oral Cancer

Ana Katarine Almeida Rios, Cristina Cangussu, Jakeline Martins Novaes Pedreira, Mércia Sacramento dos Santos, Thais Feitosa Leitão de Oliveira
{"title":"Reliability of Online Information on Self-Examination and Oral Cancer","authors":"Ana Katarine Almeida Rios, Cristina Cangussu, Jakeline Martins Novaes Pedreira, Mércia Sacramento dos Santos, Thais Feitosa Leitão de Oliveira","doi":"10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.02.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Periodic dental consultations and oral self-examination can increase the chances of an early\ndiagnosis of oral cancer. However, the restricted population access to health services in Brazil added to the\ngreater scope of the internet has increased the use of this resource as a source of information on signs,\nsymptoms and treatments of several diseases, including oral cancer.\nObjective: To assess the reliability of the information on self-examination and oral cancer available on the\nweb in Portuguese for Brazilian population.\nMethodology: In December 2018, independent searches were performed for the terms \"mouth cancer\",\n\"oral cancer\", \"oral self- examination/ self-examination\" and \"buccal self- examination / self-examination\",\non Google Search (Portuguese terms). The first fifty pages were selected for each term, and those that\nincluded prevention, diagnosis of oral cancer or described verbally and visually the oral self-examination\nwere included in the study. The quality of the information was assessed according to the criteria of the\nAmerican Medical Association and Health on the Net. Of the 108 sites evaluated, 87% did not inform the\nauthor's training, 24.1% did not inform the complementary nature of the information and 64.8% provided\nguidance consult a doctor or dentist. Scientific references were not present in 39.8% of the sites and the\n“accurate and complete” content was observed in only 35.2% of the evaluated pages.\nConclusion: The low quality of the information available on the evaluated pages, suggests low reliability\nof the content about oral cancer and oral self-examination available on the web, indicating that access to\nthis content may bring risk to the health of the Brazilian population.","PeriodicalId":72781,"journal":{"name":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.02.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Periodic dental consultations and oral self-examination can increase the chances of an early diagnosis of oral cancer. However, the restricted population access to health services in Brazil added to the greater scope of the internet has increased the use of this resource as a source of information on signs, symptoms and treatments of several diseases, including oral cancer. Objective: To assess the reliability of the information on self-examination and oral cancer available on the web in Portuguese for Brazilian population. Methodology: In December 2018, independent searches were performed for the terms "mouth cancer", "oral cancer", "oral self- examination/ self-examination" and "buccal self- examination / self-examination", on Google Search (Portuguese terms). The first fifty pages were selected for each term, and those that included prevention, diagnosis of oral cancer or described verbally and visually the oral self-examination were included in the study. The quality of the information was assessed according to the criteria of the American Medical Association and Health on the Net. Of the 108 sites evaluated, 87% did not inform the author's training, 24.1% did not inform the complementary nature of the information and 64.8% provided guidance consult a doctor or dentist. Scientific references were not present in 39.8% of the sites and the “accurate and complete” content was observed in only 35.2% of the evaluated pages. Conclusion: The low quality of the information available on the evaluated pages, suggests low reliability of the content about oral cancer and oral self-examination available on the web, indicating that access to this content may bring risk to the health of the Brazilian population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我检查与口腔癌症在线信息的可靠性
简介:定期的牙科咨询和口腔自我检查可以增加早期诊断口腔癌的机会。然而,由于巴西人口获得保健服务的机会有限,加之互联网的范围更广,这一资源作为包括口腔癌在内的几种疾病的体征、症状和治疗的信息来源得到了更多的利用。目的:评估葡萄牙语网站上巴西人群自我检查和口腔癌信息的可靠性。方法:2018年12月,在谷歌搜索(葡萄牙语)上独立搜索“口腔癌”、“口腔癌”、“口腔自我检查/自我检查”和“口腔自我检查/自我检查”。每个学期选择前50页,包括预防、口腔癌诊断或口头和视觉描述口腔自我检查的内容都被纳入研究。这些信息的质量是根据美国医学协会和网上健康的标准进行评估的。在被评估的108个网站中,87%的网站没有告知作者的培训,24.1%的网站没有告知信息的补充性质,64.8%的网站提供了咨询医生或牙医的指导。39.8%的网站没有科学参考文献,而“准确和完整”的内容仅出现在35.2%的评估页面中。结论:评估页面上可获得的信息质量较低,表明网络上有关口腔癌和口腔自我检查的内容可靠性较低,表明访问这些内容可能会给巴西人口的健康带来风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role Of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Diagnosis of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: A Scoping Review Evaluation of Socket Preservation Using Collagen Plug and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in Extracted Sockets of Mandibular Molars: A Split Mouth Study Sublingual Swelling Masquerades a Ranula: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Does Submucosal Placentrex® Injection Hasten the Soft Tissue Healing in Mandibular Third Molar Impaction Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Split-Mouth Study Finding the Way Back Home: Report of 2 Cases of Oral Metastasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1