The Accuracy Assessment of Devices Used for Distance Measuring in Dynamic Vehicle Tests

IF 1.3 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Acta Technologica Agriculturae Pub Date : 2022-08-12 DOI:10.2478/ata-2022-0023
P. Kuchar, I. Janoško, M. Holubek, J. Čedík, M. Pexa
{"title":"The Accuracy Assessment of Devices Used for Distance Measuring in Dynamic Vehicle Tests","authors":"P. Kuchar, I. Janoško, M. Holubek, J. Čedík, M. Pexa","doi":"10.2478/ata-2022-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper presented deals with the accuracy of three selected devices based on acceleration measurement: accelerometer – XL meter, the global position measurement device by VBox and the constructed 5th wheel, which allows a very accurate measurement of distance along with speed and acceleration of the vehicle. The accuracy of recordings was tested during various driving conditions when all the three measuring devices were attached to the vehicle. Measurements showed that GPS-based measuring devices level off and even surpass accelerometers when used in locations with a good view of the sky. The 5th wheel provided the most representative results, as the difference between average and real standard deviations of the measured distance were 0.78%, 1.38%, 3.48% for the 5th wheel, VBox GPS and XL meter, respectively. The accuracy of the 5th wheel and VBox can be considered very high when taking into account the fact that dynamic actions were monitored. The paper purpose is to point out the significance of measuring device selection in assessing the distance travelled by the vehicle.","PeriodicalId":43089,"journal":{"name":"Acta Technologica Agriculturae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Technologica Agriculturae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2022-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The paper presented deals with the accuracy of three selected devices based on acceleration measurement: accelerometer – XL meter, the global position measurement device by VBox and the constructed 5th wheel, which allows a very accurate measurement of distance along with speed and acceleration of the vehicle. The accuracy of recordings was tested during various driving conditions when all the three measuring devices were attached to the vehicle. Measurements showed that GPS-based measuring devices level off and even surpass accelerometers when used in locations with a good view of the sky. The 5th wheel provided the most representative results, as the difference between average and real standard deviations of the measured distance were 0.78%, 1.38%, 3.48% for the 5th wheel, VBox GPS and XL meter, respectively. The accuracy of the 5th wheel and VBox can be considered very high when taking into account the fact that dynamic actions were monitored. The paper purpose is to point out the significance of measuring device selection in assessing the distance travelled by the vehicle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
车辆动态试验中测距装置的精度评定
摘要:本文介绍了基于加速度测量的三种装置的精度:加速度计- XL仪表,VBox的全局位置测量装置和构建的第5轮,可以非常精确地测量车辆的距离、速度和加速度。当三个测量装置都安装在车辆上时,在不同的驾驶条件下测试了记录的准确性。测量结果表明,在天空视野良好的地方,基于gps的测量设备会趋于平稳,甚至超过加速度计。第5轮的测量结果最具代表性,第5轮、VBox GPS和XL meter测量距离的平均标准差与实际标准差之差分别为0.78%、1.38%、3.48%。考虑到动态动作被监控的事实,第五轮和VBox的精度可以被认为是非常高的。本文的目的是指出测量装置的选择在评估车辆行驶距离中的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Technologica Agriculturae
Acta Technologica Agriculturae AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Technologica Agriculturae is an international scientific double-blind peer reviewed journal focused on agricultural engineering. The journal is multidisciplinary and publishes original research and review papers in engineering, agricultural and biological sciences, and materials science. Aims and Scope Areas of interest include but are not limited to: agricultural and biosystems engineering; machines and mechanization of agricultural production; information and electrical technologies; agro-product and food processing engineering; physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic, soil working machinery and terramechanics; renewable energy sources and bioenergy; rural buildings; related issues from applied physics and chemistry, ecology, economy and energy.
期刊最新文献
Sustainable Bioproduct Production via Anaerobic Bioconversion by Landfill Soil Inoculum in Various Carbohydrate Wastes Impact of Machinery Passages on Soil Compaction in Field Conditions Identification of Armyworm-Infected Leaves in Corn by Image Processing and Deep Learning Evaluation of Service Brake Braking of Selected Group of Vehicles Depending on Wear of Brake System‘s Parts Optimisation and Modelling of Soil Pulverisation Index Using Response Surface Methodology for Disk Harrow Under Different Operational Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1