Foot morphology and its relationship to arch height index in asymptomatic adults versus adults presenting with foot pain (nontraumatic)

A. Agrawal, A. Siddiqui, H. Sakale, M. John
{"title":"Foot morphology and its relationship to arch height index in asymptomatic adults versus adults presenting with foot pain (nontraumatic)","authors":"A. Agrawal, A. Siddiqui, H. Sakale, M. John","doi":"10.4103/njca.njca_218_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The uniqueness of the human foot, in performing various functions, is intricately associated with different morphological parameters, and arch height index (AHI) is an important parameter for the same. The measurement of AHI has putative clinical implications in correcting the underlying causative factors, which contribute to foot pain. This study was an attempt to investigate these parameters as a correlation among asymptomatic versus patients complaining of foot pain (due to nontraumatic causes). Methodology: One hundred asymptomatic and 50 symptomatic adults were engaged in the study after taking prior consent. Various measurements (such as foot length, truncated foot length, foot breadth, arch height – [AH], and AHI) were taken in a standing position. In this study values of foot length, truncated foot length, foot breadth, AH and AHI were compared amongst the two groups . Comparison was done with earlier studies. Results: The difference in AH and AHI (P < 0.05) among the asymptomatic versus the foot pain patients, was significant. There was a considerable difference in body weight and Body Mass Index (BMI) affecting AH and AHI. AHI in the case of the symptomatic foot pain adults was 0.18 in both feet, with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.07. Conclusion: The AHI has been considered an essential parameter in defining and identifying the potential structural factors that predispose an individual to injuries of the foot. Our results indicate that the mean AHI in the case of foot pain adults (nontraumatic) was 0.18 in both feet, with an SD of 0.07. This is lower as compared to other studies. This can be attributed to the fact that earlier studies have been done on asymptomatic patients only. The present study was done to correlate between normal asymptomatic versus foot pain patients. There was a significant difference in the AH and AHI between our two study groups.","PeriodicalId":52750,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy","volume":"12 1","pages":"15 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njca.njca_218_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The uniqueness of the human foot, in performing various functions, is intricately associated with different morphological parameters, and arch height index (AHI) is an important parameter for the same. The measurement of AHI has putative clinical implications in correcting the underlying causative factors, which contribute to foot pain. This study was an attempt to investigate these parameters as a correlation among asymptomatic versus patients complaining of foot pain (due to nontraumatic causes). Methodology: One hundred asymptomatic and 50 symptomatic adults were engaged in the study after taking prior consent. Various measurements (such as foot length, truncated foot length, foot breadth, arch height – [AH], and AHI) were taken in a standing position. In this study values of foot length, truncated foot length, foot breadth, AH and AHI were compared amongst the two groups . Comparison was done with earlier studies. Results: The difference in AH and AHI (P < 0.05) among the asymptomatic versus the foot pain patients, was significant. There was a considerable difference in body weight and Body Mass Index (BMI) affecting AH and AHI. AHI in the case of the symptomatic foot pain adults was 0.18 in both feet, with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.07. Conclusion: The AHI has been considered an essential parameter in defining and identifying the potential structural factors that predispose an individual to injuries of the foot. Our results indicate that the mean AHI in the case of foot pain adults (nontraumatic) was 0.18 in both feet, with an SD of 0.07. This is lower as compared to other studies. This can be attributed to the fact that earlier studies have been done on asymptomatic patients only. The present study was done to correlate between normal asymptomatic versus foot pain patients. There was a significant difference in the AH and AHI between our two study groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无症状成年人与有足部疼痛的成年人的足部形态及其与足弓高度指数的关系(非创伤性)
背景:人类足部在执行各种功能时的独特性与不同的形态学参数有着复杂的关系,足弓高度指数(AHI)是一个重要的形态学参数。AHI的测量在纠正导致足部疼痛的潜在致病因素方面具有假定的临床意义。本研究旨在探讨这些参数在无症状足部疼痛与主诉足部疼痛(由于非创伤性原因)患者之间的相关性。方法:100名无症状和50名有症状的成年人在事先同意后参与研究。各种测量(如脚长,截脚长,脚宽,足弓高度- [AH]和AHI)在站立位置进行。本研究比较两组患者的足长、截脚长、足宽、AH和AHI值。与早期的研究进行了比较。结果:无症状足部疼痛患者与足部疼痛患者AH、AHI差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。影响AH和AHI的体重和身体质量指数(BMI)有相当大的差异。有症状足部疼痛的成年人的AHI为双足0.18,标准差(SD)为0.07。结论:AHI被认为是定义和识别潜在结构因素的重要参数,这些因素使个体易患足部损伤。我们的研究结果表明,足部疼痛成人(非创伤性)的平均AHI为0.18,SD为0.07。与其他研究相比,这一比例较低。这可能是因为早期的研究只对无症状患者进行了研究。本研究的目的是研究正常无症状足部疼痛患者与足部疼痛患者之间的相关性。两个研究组之间AH和AHI有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Incidence of Yq Microdeletion among Chattishgarh Population and Cast Based Distribution Morphometric study of nasal parameters in undergraduates at a medical university in central Uttar Pradesh A cadaveric series on urovascular anomalies Insertional footprint of achilles tendon on calcaneal tuberosity in South Indian population: A cadaveric study Novel finding: Hyo-mandibular ligament- A cadaveric study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1