Optimization of Extraction Conditions using Response Surface Methodology and HPTLC Fingerprinting Analysis of Indian Propolis

Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/22311866.2023.2185681
S. Sankaran, R. Dubey, S. Lohidasan
{"title":"Optimization of Extraction Conditions using Response Surface Methodology and HPTLC Fingerprinting Analysis of Indian Propolis","authors":"S. Sankaran, R. Dubey, S. Lohidasan","doi":"10.1080/22311866.2023.2185681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The potential of Indian propolis as a suitable therapeutic agent is still to be explored to the fullest. As variation in the chemical composition across different geographical regions has been a major concern, it is, therefore, worthwhile to systematically investigate, and assess the quality of Indian propolis and set nationalized standards. The propolis collected from three different regions were authenticated for the major plant source, followed by the evaluation of physicochemical properties. Different extraction methods were compared, with their influence on balsam content, polyphenol, and flavonoid content. The sample coded HAR using ultrasonication gave the highest extraction yield of 71.87%. Further, the process variables in the ultrasonication method (i.e. Amplitude, extraction time, the concentration of ethanol) at three levels were optimized using the Box-Behnken response design. The model was found significant with the concentration of ethanol having a maximum influence on the responses. The model was successfully verified by setting the amplitude at 48%, extraction time to 5.6 mins, and ethanol concentration to 87% v/v. The extraction efficiency of 83.86±1.17% was achieved with a substantial diminution of extraction time. The total phenolic, total flavonol, and total flavanone content of the optimized batch were 28.74±0.13 mgGAE/g, 4.66±0.78 mgQE/g, and 3.16±0.14 mgPE/g of propolis respectively. Further HPTLC fingerprint image of the optimized extract revealed the presence of quercetin, p-coumaric acid, kaempferol, chrysin, pinocembrin, and galangin. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22311866.2023.2185681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The potential of Indian propolis as a suitable therapeutic agent is still to be explored to the fullest. As variation in the chemical composition across different geographical regions has been a major concern, it is, therefore, worthwhile to systematically investigate, and assess the quality of Indian propolis and set nationalized standards. The propolis collected from three different regions were authenticated for the major plant source, followed by the evaluation of physicochemical properties. Different extraction methods were compared, with their influence on balsam content, polyphenol, and flavonoid content. The sample coded HAR using ultrasonication gave the highest extraction yield of 71.87%. Further, the process variables in the ultrasonication method (i.e. Amplitude, extraction time, the concentration of ethanol) at three levels were optimized using the Box-Behnken response design. The model was found significant with the concentration of ethanol having a maximum influence on the responses. The model was successfully verified by setting the amplitude at 48%, extraction time to 5.6 mins, and ethanol concentration to 87% v/v. The extraction efficiency of 83.86±1.17% was achieved with a substantial diminution of extraction time. The total phenolic, total flavonol, and total flavanone content of the optimized batch were 28.74±0.13 mgGAE/g, 4.66±0.78 mgQE/g, and 3.16±0.14 mgPE/g of propolis respectively. Further HPTLC fingerprint image of the optimized extract revealed the presence of quercetin, p-coumaric acid, kaempferol, chrysin, pinocembrin, and galangin. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
响应面法优化提取条件及hplc指纹图谱分析
印度蜂胶作为一种合适的治疗剂的潜力仍有待充分探索。由于不同地理区域的化学成分差异一直是一个主要问题,因此,有必要系统地调查和评估印度蜂胶的质量,并制定全国性的标准。从三个不同地区收集的蜂胶被鉴定为主要植物来源,然后进行物理化学性质评估。比较了不同提取方法对香脂含量、多酚含量和类黄酮含量的影响。超声编码HAR的提取率最高,为71.87%。进一步,采用Box-Behnken响应设计对超声法中三个水平的工艺变量(振幅、提取时间、乙醇浓度)进行优化。该模型具有显著性,乙醇浓度对反应的影响最大。将提取振幅设定为48%,提取时间为5.6 min,乙醇浓度为87% v/v,成功验证了该模型。提取效率为83.86±1.17%,提取时间明显缩短。优化后的蜂胶总酚、总黄酮醇和总黄酮含量分别为28.74±0.13 mgGAE/g、4.66±0.78 mgQE/g和3.16±0.14 mgPE/g。提取物的hplc指纹图谱显示槲皮素、对香豆酸、山奈酚、大黄素、皮诺皮素和高良姜素的存在。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1