Subtle activism: Heterotopic principles for unsettling contemporary academia from within

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Organization Pub Date : 2023-04-24 DOI:10.1177/13505084231167702
Annemette Kjærgaard, Rasmus Bergmann, M. Blasco, Tali Padan, Carole Elliott, Jamie Callahan, Sarah M. Robinson, T. Wall
{"title":"Subtle activism: Heterotopic principles for unsettling contemporary academia from within","authors":"Annemette Kjærgaard, Rasmus Bergmann, M. Blasco, Tali Padan, Carole Elliott, Jamie Callahan, Sarah M. Robinson, T. Wall","doi":"10.1177/13505084231167702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on academic activism tends to foreground vociferous and explicit forms of activism that pursue predefined political agendas. Against this backdrop, this article proposes that academic activism can take more subtle forms. Writing as an academic activist collective, we unpack what subtle activism might look like within the context of contemporary academia. We use Foucault’s concept of heterotopia to argue that subtle activism can expand the space of what is possible in academia today by experimenting with quietly unsettling norms rather than overtly opposing or rejecting them. We offer a set of principles that might underpin a subtle activist agenda, extrapolated from practices from colleagues and from own activist collective. We hope that these principles may serve to inspire other academics wishing to engage in subtle activism by unsettling everyday practices that discreetly challenge the status quo, thereby contributing to gently shifting the agenda for how it is possible to conduct intellectual work in the contemporary neoliberal university context.","PeriodicalId":48238,"journal":{"name":"Organization","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084231167702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on academic activism tends to foreground vociferous and explicit forms of activism that pursue predefined political agendas. Against this backdrop, this article proposes that academic activism can take more subtle forms. Writing as an academic activist collective, we unpack what subtle activism might look like within the context of contemporary academia. We use Foucault’s concept of heterotopia to argue that subtle activism can expand the space of what is possible in academia today by experimenting with quietly unsettling norms rather than overtly opposing or rejecting them. We offer a set of principles that might underpin a subtle activist agenda, extrapolated from practices from colleagues and from own activist collective. We hope that these principles may serve to inspire other academics wishing to engage in subtle activism by unsettling everyday practices that discreetly challenge the status quo, thereby contributing to gently shifting the agenda for how it is possible to conduct intellectual work in the contemporary neoliberal university context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微妙的激进主义:从内部扰乱当代学术的异质性原则
对学术激进主义的研究往往预示着追求预定义政治议程的激烈而明确的激进主义形式。在这种背景下,本文提出学术激进主义可以采取更微妙的形式。作为一个学术活动家集体,我们揭示了在当代学术背景下,微妙的激进主义可能是什么样子。我们用福柯的异托邦概念来论证,微妙的激进主义可以通过实验悄悄地令人不安的规范,而不是公开反对或拒绝它们,来扩大当今学术界的可能空间。我们提供了一套原则,这些原则可能会支撑一个微妙的活动家议程,从同事和自己的活动家集体的实践中推断出来。我们希望,这些原则可以激励其他希望通过扰乱谨慎挑战现状的日常实践来参与微妙行动主义的学者,从而有助于温和地改变如何在当代新自由主义大学背景下开展智力工作的议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Organization
Organization MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The journal encompasses the full range of key theoretical, methodological and substantive debates and developments in organizational analysis, broadly conceived, identifying and assessing their impacts on organizational practices worldwide. Alongside more micro-processual analyses, it particularly encourages attention to the links between intellectual developments, changes in organizational forms and practices, and broader social, cultural and institutional transformations.
期刊最新文献
Alter-anthropological thought in organization studies From anti-state Nazism to neo-bureaucracy? Media Review: Lupin: Eradicating the stereotype of the African immigrant Carta Aberta: (In)visibilizing transgender bodies in organizations Rethinking organization studies methods through a posthumanist epistemology of practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1