The economic value of heritage in England: A benefit transfer study

Q1 Social Sciences City, Culture and Society Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100417
Ricky Lawton , Daniel Fujiwara , Susana Mourato , Hasan Bakhshi , Augustin Lagarde , John Davies
{"title":"The economic value of heritage in England: A benefit transfer study","authors":"Ricky Lawton ,&nbsp;Daniel Fujiwara ,&nbsp;Susana Mourato ,&nbsp;Hasan Bakhshi ,&nbsp;Augustin Lagarde ,&nbsp;John Davies","doi":"10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Historic buildings contribute an important part of the cultural capital of urban heritage areas. Better understanding the benefits for both users and for non-users can aid efficient allocation of resources to the preservation of heritage. Benefit transfer (BT) is an established cost-effective method for assigning economic values to public goods which have no market price, such as local heritage. BT takes stated preference data (willingness to pay (WTP)) elicited through surveys of relevant populations collected at multiple sites to produce an average or adjusted WTP value that is representative to comparable sites. Yet the empirical record is sparse for heritage assets. Consequently, BT is commonly applied without consideration of the error introduced by the transfer, or by transferring values from single-site studies, which introduces the risk of outlier bias. Our approach simultaneously collects WTP estimates from multiple heritage sites using an online survey tailored to the context of each site. This enables application of a comprehensive range of BT tests to the values obtained. We find that transfer error across the heritage sites surveyed is within accepted thresholds of error, providing confidence in the bank of values for transfer to comparable sites. We provide practical guidance on how the values obtained through our method can be applied by practitioners and government analysts, and outline the trade-offs between bulk data collection of multiple sites in a single category of cultural heritage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39061,"journal":{"name":"City, Culture and Society","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916621000473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Historic buildings contribute an important part of the cultural capital of urban heritage areas. Better understanding the benefits for both users and for non-users can aid efficient allocation of resources to the preservation of heritage. Benefit transfer (BT) is an established cost-effective method for assigning economic values to public goods which have no market price, such as local heritage. BT takes stated preference data (willingness to pay (WTP)) elicited through surveys of relevant populations collected at multiple sites to produce an average or adjusted WTP value that is representative to comparable sites. Yet the empirical record is sparse for heritage assets. Consequently, BT is commonly applied without consideration of the error introduced by the transfer, or by transferring values from single-site studies, which introduces the risk of outlier bias. Our approach simultaneously collects WTP estimates from multiple heritage sites using an online survey tailored to the context of each site. This enables application of a comprehensive range of BT tests to the values obtained. We find that transfer error across the heritage sites surveyed is within accepted thresholds of error, providing confidence in the bank of values for transfer to comparable sites. We provide practical guidance on how the values obtained through our method can be applied by practitioners and government analysts, and outline the trade-offs between bulk data collection of multiple sites in a single category of cultural heritage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国遗产的经济价值:利益转移研究
历史建筑是城市遗产地文化资本的重要组成部分。更好地了解使用者和非使用者的利益,有助于有效地分配资源以保护遗产。利益转移(BT)是一种既定的具有成本效益的方法,用于为当地遗产等没有市场价格的公共物品分配经济价值。英国电信通过在多个站点收集的相关人群的调查得出陈述的偏好数据(支付意愿(WTP)),以产生对可比站点具有代表性的平均或调整的WTP值。然而,关于遗产资产的经验记录很少。因此,在应用BT时通常不考虑转移或从单点研究转移值所引入的误差,这引入了异常值偏差的风险。我们的方法同时收集多个遗产地的WTP估计值,使用针对每个遗产地背景的在线调查。这使得应用全面范围的BT测试获得的值。我们发现,在被调查的遗产遗址之间的转移误差在可接受的误差阈值范围内,为转移到可比遗址的价值库提供了信心。我们为从业者和政府分析人员如何应用我们的方法获得的价值提供了实用指导,并概述了在单一文化遗产类别中收集多个地点的大量数据之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
City, Culture and Society
City, Culture and Society Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The public library building as nexus for social interactions: Cases from Helsinki Urban religion and gendered bodies Decoding urban power: Architecture, symbolism and territorial control in Caracas Analysis of contextual factors influencing the development of unplanned settlements: The case of Herat City, Afghanistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1