Heuristics in the wild: exploring fund manager decisions through the COVID pandemic

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Qualitative Research in financial Markets Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.1108/QRFM-09-2021-0149
Daniel Gilcher
{"title":"Heuristics in the wild: exploring fund manager decisions through the COVID pandemic","authors":"Daniel Gilcher","doi":"10.1108/QRFM-09-2021-0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to provide a novel explorative perspective on fund managers’ decisions under uncertainty. The current COVID pandemic is used as a unique reference frame to study how heuristics are used in institutional financial practice.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study follows a grounded theory approach. A total of 282 diverse publications between October 2019 and October 2020 for 20 German mutual funds are qualitatively analyzed. A theory of adaptive heuristics for fund managers is developed.\n\n\nFindings\nFund managers adapt their heuristics during a crisis and this adaptive process flows through three stages. Increasing complexity in the environment leads to the adaption of simplest heuristics around investment decisions. Three distinct stages of adaption: precrisis, uncertainty and stabilization emerge from the data.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study’s data is based on publicly available information. There might be a discrepancy between publicly stated and internal reasoning.\n\n\nPractical implications\nMoney managers can use the provided framework to assess their decision-making in crises. The developed adaptive processes of heuristics can assist capital allocators who choose and rate fund managers. Policymakers and regulators can learn about the aspects of investor decisions that their actions and communication address. Teaching can use this study to exemplify the nature of financial markets as adaptive systems rather than static structures.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the author’s/authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to systematically explore the heuristics of professional money managers because they navigate a large-scale exogenous crisis.\n","PeriodicalId":45060,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in financial Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-09-2021-0149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to provide a novel explorative perspective on fund managers’ decisions under uncertainty. The current COVID pandemic is used as a unique reference frame to study how heuristics are used in institutional financial practice. Design/methodology/approach This study follows a grounded theory approach. A total of 282 diverse publications between October 2019 and October 2020 for 20 German mutual funds are qualitatively analyzed. A theory of adaptive heuristics for fund managers is developed. Findings Fund managers adapt their heuristics during a crisis and this adaptive process flows through three stages. Increasing complexity in the environment leads to the adaption of simplest heuristics around investment decisions. Three distinct stages of adaption: precrisis, uncertainty and stabilization emerge from the data. Research limitations/implications This study’s data is based on publicly available information. There might be a discrepancy between publicly stated and internal reasoning. Practical implications Money managers can use the provided framework to assess their decision-making in crises. The developed adaptive processes of heuristics can assist capital allocators who choose and rate fund managers. Policymakers and regulators can learn about the aspects of investor decisions that their actions and communication address. Teaching can use this study to exemplify the nature of financial markets as adaptive systems rather than static structures. Originality/value To the best of the author’s/authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to systematically explore the heuristics of professional money managers because they navigate a large-scale exogenous crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野外启发:探索新冠肺炎疫情期间基金经理的决策
目的本文旨在为基金经理在不确定性条件下的决策提供一个新的探索视角。当前的新冠肺炎疫情被用作研究启发式方法如何在机构金融实践中使用的独特参考框架。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用了有根据的理论方法。对2019年10月至2020年10月期间20只德国共同基金的282份不同出版物进行了定性分析。提出了一种适用于基金经理的自适应启发式理论。FindingsFund经理在危机期间调整他们的启发式方法,这种调整过程分为三个阶段。环境的复杂性不断增加,导致围绕投资决策采用最简单的启发式方法。适应的三个不同阶段:危机前、不确定性和稳定来自数据。研究局限性/含义本研究的数据基于公开信息。公开声明的推理和内部推理之间可能存在差异。实际含义基金经理可以使用所提供的框架来评估他们在危机中的决策。所开发的启发式自适应过程可以帮助选择和评级基金经理的资本配置人员。政策制定者和监管机构可以了解他们的行动和沟通所涉及的投资者决策的各个方面。教学可以利用这项研究来举例说明金融市场作为适应性系统而不是静态结构的性质。独创性/价值据作者所知,本研究首次系统地探讨了职业基金经理在应对大规模外生危机时的启发式方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Qualitative Research in Financial Markets is the only peer-reviewed journal dedicated to exploring the rapidly-growing area of research activity in finance that uses qualitative methods. Building on a long pedigree of finance research, the journal publishes international and innovative analyses and novel insights into financial markets worldwide
期刊最新文献
Exploring the potential impact of big data on the collection of sufficient, appropriate audit evidence: insights from auditors in the UAE Determinants inhibiting digital payment system adoption: an Indian perspective Debt advice in Europe: a search of the good practices to fight over-indebtedness A qualitative investigation into financial well-being and social capital of retired government school teachers The implications of Maqasid al-Shari’ah for integrated sustainability practices among businesses: a qualitative inquiry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1