An Evaluation of an Integrative Intervention for Work and Mental Health: The WIN Program

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Career Assessment Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1177/10690727231196143
David L. Blustein, B. Allan, Amy J. Mazur, Ofer Sharone, Kelsey L. Autin, R. G. Cinamon, J. Ferreira, S. Kozan, Camille M. Smith, Brian J. Stevenson, Mindi N. Thompson
{"title":"An Evaluation of an Integrative Intervention for Work and Mental Health: The WIN Program","authors":"David L. Blustein, B. Allan, Amy J. Mazur, Ofer Sharone, Kelsey L. Autin, R. G. Cinamon, J. Ferreira, S. Kozan, Camille M. Smith, Brian J. Stevenson, Mindi N. Thompson","doi":"10.1177/10690727231196143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to describe the development of a new intervention for jobseekers and to assess its efficacy using a naturalistic, pre-post intervention design. In contrast to existing work-based interventions, the Work Intervention Network (WIN) intervention targets multiple intersecting domains through four modules and via six group sessions: deepening and sustaining relationships; fostering social awareness and reducing self-blame; building emotional resilience and self-care; and planning, exploring, and engaging in the job search. To evaluate the intervention, we first recruited a sample of 33 jobseekers to provide feedback on the program. Integrating their feedback into the design of the program, we then recruited a sample of 108 jobseekers who filled out surveys before and after the six-session intervention, which assessed work and mental health functioning across the four domains. Results revealed that participants were highly satisfied with the intervention and reported large increases in social support, belonging, psychological well-being, job search engagement, and work hope as well as decreases in isolation and self-blame. This study provides strong support for the WIN intervention and has implications for how to support jobseekers in an increasingly precarious labor environment.","PeriodicalId":47978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Career Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Career Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727231196143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the development of a new intervention for jobseekers and to assess its efficacy using a naturalistic, pre-post intervention design. In contrast to existing work-based interventions, the Work Intervention Network (WIN) intervention targets multiple intersecting domains through four modules and via six group sessions: deepening and sustaining relationships; fostering social awareness and reducing self-blame; building emotional resilience and self-care; and planning, exploring, and engaging in the job search. To evaluate the intervention, we first recruited a sample of 33 jobseekers to provide feedback on the program. Integrating their feedback into the design of the program, we then recruited a sample of 108 jobseekers who filled out surveys before and after the six-session intervention, which assessed work and mental health functioning across the four domains. Results revealed that participants were highly satisfied with the intervention and reported large increases in social support, belonging, psychological well-being, job search engagement, and work hope as well as decreases in isolation and self-blame. This study provides strong support for the WIN intervention and has implications for how to support jobseekers in an increasingly precarious labor environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作与心理健康的综合干预评估:WIN计划
本研究的目的是描述一种针对求职者的新干预措施的开发,并使用自然的干预前后设计来评估其疗效。与现有的基于工作的干预措施不同,工作干预网络的干预措施通过四个模块和六个小组会议针对多个交叉领域:加深和维持关系;培养社会意识,减少自责;建立情绪恢复力和自我照顾;以及计划、探索和参与求职。为了评估干预措施,我们首先招募了33名求职者作为样本,对该计划提供反馈。将他们的反馈纳入该计划的设计中,然后我们招募了108名求职者的样本,他们在六节课干预前后填写了调查,评估了四个领域的工作和心理健康功能。结果显示,参与者对干预措施非常满意,并报告称社会支持、归属感、心理健康、求职参与度和工作希望大幅增加,孤独感和自责感下降。这项研究为WIN干预提供了有力的支持,并对如何在日益不稳定的劳动环境中支持求职者具有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Career Assessment
Journal of Career Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
15.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The Journal of Career Assessment publishes methodologically sound, empirically based studies focusing on the process and techniques by which counselors and others gain understanding of the individual faced with the necessity of making informed career decisions. The term career assessment, as used in this journal, covers the various techniques, tests, inventories, rating scales, interview schedules, surveys, and direct observational methods used in scientifically based practice and research to provide an improved understanding of career decision-making. The focus is not just testing, but all those means developed and used to assess and evaluate individuals and environments in the field of career counseling and development.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of the Online Proactive Career Behavior Scale Vocational Experiences of Korean Women With a High School Diploma: Insights into Work Precarity and Social Marginalization Protean Career Orientation and Career Success: On the Roles of Proactive Career Process During the School-To-Work Transition Improving School-to-Work Transitions: Antecedents of High-Quality Intern-Supervisor Exchanges Examining the Role of Mentoring on Perceived Employability Among University Students in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1